JTStarkiller
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2006
- Messages
- 4,821
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Me neither, though I will still be buying the hell out of Captain Marvel. Heyo!
It is whining and closed minded to come in and immediately call an idea stupid when you know absolutely nothing about the basis of the book or why Angela is picking up the Ms. Marvel moniker. You don't even know what Angela is in the Marvel universe. Just because they brung her in doesn't mean it's stupid for them to give the character a title named anything other than Angela. From a business standpoint, it makes perfect sense because it allows them to keep the Ms. Marvel trademark in use, situates Angela in the Marvel universe in a familiar manner, and in turn gives buyers a familiar title to gravitate to when they don't necessarily know why they should care about Angela at all.
Those are the kinds of things people don't think about when you immediately jump off and call something stupid. You're looking for reasons why it's stupid based on a kneejerk reaction of them rebranding a character they just acquired, and not thinking about WHY it makes sense and why Marvel would do it. I'd rather have them rebrand her as Ms. Marvel and give her book a chance than title it Angela and have a lot of comic fans not even giving the book a try because they have no historical attachment to the character.
Anyway, depending on the premise, I'll be picking it up. I have a feeling it will be very cosmic and relevant to what's going in the Marvel universe and everything ailing it. And also explore a new side of it, since Angela may well be an angel.
Also, I find it interesting that they didn't attach a creative team to it. This makes me think they didn't want to because it would spoil who the character was referring to...which in turn makes me think that Neil Gaiman is going to be writing this. We'll see.
I will neither pick up a book called Ms.Marvel nor Angela.
Is it for sure Angela? I read speculation that it could be Rogue, with the letters being green and her history with CarolI would buy a Ms. Marvel book if it was Carol wearing the costume again or if it was someone else that made more sense......like Sharon Ventura or Monica Rambeau....two people that have an actual history with the name.
How am I modding? I'm telling you your opinion is a kneejerk reaction, as you pretty much admit there, just using "initial reaction" as a substitute. As I said, you know nothing about what the title will be like or why they're doing it. Calling it dumb immediately is what I said, close minded. I wouldn't give a **** but I see this type of mentality too much lately when it comes to comics and why Marvel does what they do. Fans think it's "stupid" because they don't understand the business sense behind it, but everything they do is to sale the comics and they know full well what they're doing. As I said, you're looking for reasons to complain immediately, instead of thinking WHY they're doing it.Are you mental? First off - it's my opinion. I think it's dumb. That's my initial reaction. I said what I had to say, I'm not spamming, I'm not flaming others for thinking it's a great idea. The last time I checked, you're not a Mod, so don't act like you're above others because you don't agree.
Also, how does it make business sense? Ms. Marvel is property of Marvel Comics. Just because the character isn't using that name right now doesn't mean they're going to lose it to public domain. Weak argument there.
they aren't in danger of losing the Ms. Marvel trademark. They use it regular in their cartoons, videogames, non-canon books, etc... They don't have to make Angela the new Ms. Marvel in order to hold on to it. They could have finally had Carol become Ms. Marvel in the Ultimate line to keep it going on a more continuous basis within the books. That'd have made sense.Wanting to keep the trademark in use doesn't mean you're trying to keep the rights all the time. It's for marketing and merchandising purposes as well as historical relevance. It connects with people more. It's not a weak argument, you just don't get the business sense behind it and how it works with the comic industry.
If Rogue became Ms. Marvel then people will be able to spell her name.
If Rogue became Ms. Marvel then people will be able to spell her name.
There's storyline possibilities with Angela in the Marvel Universe without giving her the Ms. Marvel name. Repackaging her this soon makes zero sense to me.
I could understand them doing it if no one is interested in reading about her right out of the gate but to do it this soon...? It seems to me like Marvel had ZERO clue what to do with her after obtaining the rights to her.
A grown up Marvel Girl = Ms. Marvel. If Angela is Jean Grey "reborn" as an "Angel" in "Heaven" it would explain why they would give her the Ms. Marvel moniker and what her connection to it is. It also explains why Tony and Peter said she looks familiar in GOTG 6, especially considering we know Peter saw a young Jean Grey in his visions of the future and past when the timestream broke which, as far as we know, is the only way Peter has ever seen Jean Grey. Also remember that Angela is on the Guardians of the Galaxy roster during the Trial of Jean Grey event...perhaps there is more to that than just Bendis wanting her on the roster and isn't a coincidence. It also opens up a ton of possibilities about what heaven and angels are that can be explored in the new Ms. Marvel title.
Just throwing that out there.
Oh no! A typing error! THE HORROR!!!!