The Dark Knight Rises OFFICIAL: Batman in the Burgh - Part 10

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hm, which parts? In my theory all the wing parts would move if it transforms. I'm still confused by this Cherry Way scene, is it meant to be the batwing launching a missile into the ground and then going inside the crater? Sounds mad.

I think that scene calls for the turret tumbler to be disabled by falling into the hole. or even perhaps flipping it by having it explode as it passes over it.
 
I think that scene calls for the turret tumbler to be disabled by falling into the hole. or even perhaps flipping it by having it explode as it passes over it.

Yeah could be something like that.
 
maybe the only way to stop Bane is to throw him into cement. a comicbook ending heheh
 
Maybe Batman is just going to get some cement to repair the hole he made in the road. :oldrazz:
 
I'm staying silent to protect the sources.
Probably the same guy I spoke to on the set of TDK. His name is Chris, and he's one of the lead designers.

Not Linda Hemming, but he can be seen on the BEGINS dvd talking about the design of the bat-suit. He dished tons of details to me about the suit while they were filming TDK. Before pics were even released of it, too. Real cool guy. Doesn't take the thing too seriously.

I highly doubt you'd get in any kind of trouble releasing even the smallest bit of info about the costume that you've heard.

It's not that big of a deal. You're not spoiling the movie for the masses by telling what you've heard, but whatever's clever haha
 
In fact it would be kind of hypocritical why you're not sharing what you've heard about the simple look or function of the Catwoman suit.

You're literally giving video footage on a daily basis, spoiling actual in scene photography of what we are to see in a movie.

And you can't describe what you've heard w/o revealing a source?

Even revealing the information alone won't tip anyone off to who you heard it from. Think about how many people within the production know about how the Catwoman suit works functionality wise, or what it looks like (an even greater number of people) ...
 
In fact it would be kind of hypocritical why you're not sharing what you've heard about the simple look or function of the Catwoman suit.

You're literally giving video footage on a daily basis, spoiling actual in scene photography of what we are to see in a movie.

And you can't describe what you've heard w/o revealing a source?

Even revealing the information alone won't tip anyone off to who you heard it from. Think about how many people within the production know about how the Catwoman suit works functionality wise, or what it looks like (an even greater number of people) ...

That's just rude. He's given us more than enough already. He's made his decision, and no amount of your logic should change that. You should respect his reasons and be happy with what he's given us daily for the last couple of weeks.
 
Maybe a Mob Scene at the cement factory..

Nope, no extras around. I thought it might be the same place as the trailer, but Christian bale and Tom hardy aren't in Pittsburgh, and the scene is outside, so that theory isn't make a whole lot of sense.
 
Fight in factory and villain thrown in a substance/liquid that kills him? Terminator 2 flashbacks for me. :)
 
In fact it would be kind of hypocritical why you're not sharing what you've heard about the simple look or function of the Catwoman suit.

You're literally giving video footage on a daily basis, spoiling actual in scene photography of what we are to see in a movie.

And you can't describe what you've heard w/o revealing a source?

Even revealing the information alone won't tip anyone off to who you heard it from. Think about how many people within the production know about how the Catwoman suit works functionality wise, or what it looks like (an even greater number of people) ...


Well if that doesn't talk him into it I don't know what will.
 
In fact it would be kind of hypocritical why you're not sharing what you've heard about the simple look or function of the Catwoman suit.

You're literally giving video footage on a daily basis, spoiling actual in scene photography of what we are to see in a movie.

And you can't describe what you've heard w/o revealing a source?

Even revealing the information alone won't tip anyone off to who you heard it from. Think about how many people within the production know about how the Catwoman suit works functionality wise, or what it looks like (an even greater number of people) ...

Dude you couldn't be more rude. Be thankful you get anything from subaru.
 
That's just rude. He's given us more than enough already. He's made his decision, and no amount of your logic should change that. You should respect his reasons and be happy with what he's given us daily for the last couple of weeks.

Thank you.
 
That's just rude. He's given us more than enough already. He's made his decision, and no amount of your logic should change that. You should respect his reasons and be happy with what he's given us daily for the last couple of weeks.
I'm not meaning to be confrontational or rude. And really someone would have to be really sensitive to consider this "rude" ... I'm not putting the guy down in a personal way.

Just pointing out the visible flaw in logic. I respect his decision, just saying it doesn't make much sense. He respects this source enough to not reveal information (even though it wouldn't directly incriminate anyone) ... yet he doesn't have enough respect for a film's production to take VIDEO FOOTAGE of in scene film production? Essentially disrespecting the film maker's vision by showing footage before it's ready to be seen (which is also basically stealing) .... I'm just saying very hypocritical. I'm not saying what he's done isn't appreciated, or what have you.
 
Dude you couldn't be more rude. Be thankful you get anything from subaru.
I'm not watching the videos he's providing. I don't want to spoil and watch stolen footage of a movie production before it's ready to be seen, within the right context. It's not like he's just there for us taking videos, pics, etc. Clearly he wants to be there, and is enjoying himself. He's a fan.

If he took it as being rude, well I'm sorry he took it that way. It's all his perception, though.

I'm not going to walk on eggs shells sharing my opinion just because he's provided the internet w/ videos of the production.
 
Yeh, sorry b. You know where they're about to go at it? The chains hanging down and stuff makes it look a bit industrial.
it could be. i think in the movie it will be the narrows. similar lighting,wet,dirty,.... :woot:
 
I'm not meaning to be confrontational or rude. And really someone would have to be really sensitive to consider this "rude" ... I'm not putting the guy down in a personal way.

Just pointing out the visible flaw in logic. I respect his decision, just saying it doesn't make much sense. He respects this source enough to not reveal information (even though it wouldn't directly incriminate anyone) ... yet he doesn't have enough respect for a film's production to take VIDEO FOOTAGE of in scene film production? Essentially disrespecting the film maker's vision by showing footage before it's ready to be seen (which is also basically stealing) .... I'm just saying very hypocritical. I'm not saying what he's done isn't appreciated, or what have you.


Yeah but for all you know it could cost someone their job. The footage Sub's has given us is at no-one's risk but his own.
 
I'm not meaning to be confrontational or rude. And really someone would have to be really sensitive to consider this "rude" ... I'm not putting the guy down in a personal way.

Just pointing out the visible flaw in logic. I respect his decision, just saying it doesn't make much sense. He respects this source enough to not reveal information (even though it wouldn't directly incriminate anyone) ... yet he doesn't have enough respect for a film's production to take VIDEO FOOTAGE of in scene film production? Essentially disrespecting the film maker's vision by showing footage before it's ready to be seen (which is also basically stealing) .... I'm just saying very hypocritical. I'm not saying what he's done isn't appreciated, or what have you.

If he doesn't want to reveal what he has heard then let's drop it. Because you can explain all day why his logic is 'flawed' but it's all moot and it's only going to lead to more unneeded arguments. You know this will happen.
 
Yeah but for all you know it could cost someone their job.
Probably wouldn't. Especially if the person is of actual importance to the film's production team.

It's just information about the look of a character.

He's literally spoon feeding people ACTUAL scenes from the movie, and is actually in essence stealing.

His videos that he provides are way more damaging to the production and secrecy of everything, than revealing in WORDS what he's heard the Catwoman out fit will look in its final.

I mean let's be reality here.

How you could excuse one, at the expense of the other is REALLY hypocritical. Especially considering the one being excused is WAY more damaging to the film.
 
If he doesn't want to reveal what he has heard then let's drop it. Because you can explain all day why his logic is 'flawed' but it's all moot and it's only going to lead to more unneeded arguments. You know this will happen.
I'm not trying to convince him to do anything. He can do what he wants. Just saying it's hypocritical. Consider it dropped. Point was made. That's all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,997
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"