Marvolo
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 47,795
- Reaction score
- 10,771
- Points
- 103
These complaints about pace & chores - first question, those people making these complaints, did you not play the first game ? second, it's 1899, it's not BTTF Part III and it's not GTA : Tarintino does Rockstar.
It's an immersive 'realistic' view of life in that period of history. You are going to have to work to stay alive, whether that be food finding, making a home for yourself, feeding loved ones or friends. That's how it was, there wasn't a B&Q down the road.
As far as the vista's go, they are beautiful and expansive, John Ford-era.
Yeah I played the first one. And I hated the chores in that game too. I had hoped they wouldnt increase the chores a hundredfold.
And realism isnt always a good thing. In real life I have to go buy food, cook it, eat it, work on my vehicles, buy fuel, go to work, wash clothes, buy clothes etc. I dont want to do that kind of mundane tedium in a video game. That **** isnt fun or even compelling.
Even movies and books set in western times dont show or detail every mundane aspect of life during that time. Because any sensible storyteller knows that there is such a thing as too much realism.
And the issue is not just too much realism. Clunky time sucking mechanics are another issue. Making the player pick up each individual item in a cabinet or chest and animating each pick up is inefficient and a waste of time. A loot all mechanic and an animation of him opening the chest picking up some things and closing the chest would have saved time, and achieved the same thing. But I guess Rockstar thinks more button presses and making us pick up one thing at a time is somehow more realistic. Apparently in western times people didnt know how to pick up multiple items at once.
Perhaps in the third game they'll include cholera and smallpox that can perma kill and delete save files. Yay for realism.
Last edited: