ironman_rick
Civilian
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 941
- Reaction score
- 225
- Points
- 53
Welll at least with these numbers, this movie will at least make a billion. So that's cool.
This is all true, and the fault lies with both Rian Johnson and JJ because neither movie is really that good.
You are wrong about the legs though. Every metric proves it. If this film had any legs at all it wouldnt be dropping 59%. Even worse, it wouldnt be underperforming in one of the best positions holiday wise you can get. It opened lower than expectations, it is dropping worse than expectations and it is about to fall off a cliff after Jan 1. Every number backs up the "meh" legs including the weak B+ Cinemascore and the 86% audience score on RT. (which is roughly a B+ give or take) There are no legs for this...the numbers will continue to drop and after the new year it will lose quite a few screens and the bleeding will be really bad.
There was always going to be a massive drop from TFA to TLJ because TFA was lightning in a bottle. If Rian and JJ had just played this smart instead of each making tyheir own films that contradict each other it wouldnt be this dramatic. Its too bad...
This is all true, and the fault lies with both Rian Johnson and JJ because neither movie is really that good.
You are wrong about the legs though. Every metric proves it. If this film had any legs at all it wouldnt be dropping 59%. Even worse, it wouldnt be underperforming in one of the best positions holiday wise you can get. It opened lower than expectations, it is dropping worse than expectations and it is about to fall off a cliff after Jan 1. Every number backs up the "meh" legs including the weak B+ Cinemascore and the 86% audience score on RT. (which is roughly a B+ give or take) There are no legs for this...the numbers will continue to drop and after the new year it will lose quite a few screens and the bleeding will be really bad.
There was always going to be a massive drop from TFA to TLJ because TFA was lightning in a bottle. If Rian and JJ had just played this smart instead of each making tyheir own films that contradict each other it wouldnt be this dramatic. Its too bad...
they'll never sell, but they need to clean house at the top
The OS being a sold amount ahead of USA is good but over all i thought the movie was going to be closer to 750 WW now.
Especially since they just built all their theme parks with a big Star Wars attraction.The fact that there are people out there who believe Disney will sell Star Wars is hilarious.
Regardless of how the last two flicks did SW is a massive pop culture phenomenon and has been for decades. The merch alone still gives them a **** ton of cash.
True but noone gives a damn about merch.Regardless of how the last two flicks did SW is a massive pop culture phenomenon and has been for decades. The merch alone still gives them a **** ton of cash.
The point about relationships between the lead characters, and the way that the audience's engagement builds off of the sense that the characters grow to truly care about and rely on each other, was made about the prequel trilogy as well.
The relationship between Obi Wan and Anakin is the only one in the PT that might be said to escape the problem, and even then only somewhat. Their relationship feels pretty stiff and forced a lot of the time.
It's a simple thing, but it's a big part of what makes these stories work. Tolkien understood this in the Lord of the Rings. The "fellowship" aspect is so important. Of course the tides of fortune will break up the group along the way, and the bonds of friendship will be particularly strong between certain individuals, like Frodo and Sam, Merry and Pippin, or Legolas and Gimli. But larger groups of friends reuniting at times along the way is also important, especially at the end.
The original Star Wars movies had this. I thought that Rogue One had it to some extent, or at least it had a little of that charm. Not on the same level, but I did feel a little of that camaraderie.
But neither the PT nor the ST have had it. That's not good because it's such a central part of why these stories work. The adventuring group setting out into the unknown to confront evil.
Harry Potter has a version of it. Harry, Hermione and Ron being the core group, with a larger group of friends built up around them.
The box office results of TROS might indeed be very disappointing.
That having been said, don't expect Disney to sell the rights to Star Wars anytime soon.
Yeah, people called Avengers 1 a lightning in a bottle moment at the time too. I never thought TFA or Avengers 1 were lightning in a bottle moments to the degree of something like Titanic. A Titanic 2 obviously isn't going to do anything close to the original. The success of Star Wars and a team comic universe is something that can be replicated. I think all the Avengers sequels proved me right with the slightly mixed reception AoU making nearly the same as the massively hyped original and the 2 larger scale films blowing it away (the final one making not far off double). SW also has had a number of so called LiaB moments with the original, TPM and TFA. In the first 2 case the films that followed all still did well, bouncing back further with the finality of their 3rd entries. Many of the people complaining are fans who are or were in the market for many rewatches of TLJ, Solo and TROS. I always though I'd watch the final film 10 times for eg and I'm not exactly the most vocal, unsatisfied fan.I don't agree with that it was always going to have a massive drop. While TLJ didn't have quite the same hype as TFA it was still not far off, which the OW numbers show by differing 12%. If the film can create roughly the same kind of hype it can make reasonably similar money. TLJ made a lot less money than what was expected of it.
Age of Ultron was considered a disappointment when it made $1.4B to the Avengers' $1.52B. The OW numbers were a little bit closer, 8%, but AoU was still vastly more successful in comparison to its predecessor than TLJ was, and yet came in below expectations.
I don't agree with that it was always going to have a massive drop. While TLJ didn't have quite the same hype as TFA it was still not far off, which the OW numbers show by differing 12%. If the film can create roughly the same kind of hype it can make reasonably similar money. TLJ made a lot less money than what was expected of it.
Age of Ultron was considered a disappointment when it made $1.4B to the Avengers' $1.52B. The OW numbers were a little bit closer, 8%, but AoU was still vastly more successful in comparison to its predecessor than TLJ was, and yet came in below expectations.
Yeah, people called Avengers 1 a lightning in a bottle moment at the time too. I never thought TFA or Avengers 1 were lightning in a bottle moments to the degree of something like Titanic. A Titanic 2 obviously isn't going to do anything close to the original. The success of Star Wars and a team comic universe is something that can be replicated. I think all the Avengers sequels proved me right with the slightly mixed reception AoU making nearly the same as the massively hyped original and the 2 larger scale films blowing it away (the final one making not far off double). SW also has had a number of so called LiaB moments with the original, TPM and TFA. In the first 2 case the films that followed all still did well, bouncing back further with the finality of their 3rd entries. Many of the people complaining are fans who are or were in the market for many rewatches of TLJ, Solo and TROS. I always though I'd watch the final film 10 times for eg and I'm not exactly the most vocal, unsatisfied fan.
The fact that there are people out there who believe Disney will sell Star Wars is hilarious.
Star Wars has the most potential at the box office of all the Disney franchises. It’s film division is simply headed by the most incapable and wrongly suited, who scorned the auteur who gave it its life. Favreau and Filoni in charge would ensure that Star Wars will reach its full potential and they likewise respect and consult with George Lucas and ask for his input and INCLUDE his input.
Yeah, people called Avengers 1 a lightning in a bottle moment at the time too. I never thought TFA or Avengers 1 were lightning in a bottle moments to the degree of something like Titanic. A Titanic 2 obviously isn't going to do anything close to the original. The success of Star Wars and a team comic universe is something that can be replicated. I think all the Avengers sequels proved me right with the slightly mixed reception AoU making nearly the same as the massively hyped original and the 2 larger scale films blowing it away (the final one making not far off double). SW also has had a number of so called LiaB moments with the original, TPM and TFA. In the first 2 case the films that followed all still did well, bouncing back further with the finality of their 3rd entries. Many of the people complaining are fans who are or were in the market for many rewatches of TLJ, Solo and TROS. I always though I'd watch the final film 10 times for eg and I'm not exactly the most vocal, unsatisfied fan.
The 10 year gap, the hated prequels,
Merch sales is way down. Hell by holding off on the Baby Yoda stuff to not spoil it they lost out on tons of merch money for that as well. I have seen almost no ROS merch around either. (unlike say Frozen which is everywhere)
I cant speak to the Mandalorian I havent watched it...but I have heard good and bad things about it. I will maintain they should build the brand up with TV stuff like that though.