"WHEEEERE'S THE TRIGGER!?! WHERE IS ITTTTT!?!
ARGH! YOU WOULD NEVER GIVE IT TO AN ORDINARY CITISHUN!!
TELL ME WHERE THE TRIGGER IS!!"
"I AHM THE LEAGUE UF SH-ADOOOOHS!"
"So YHOU CAME BAHCK, TO DIE WITH YOUR CITY."
"No.. I came back to stop you."
I don't have a problem with a focus on Bruce Wayne. I remember the first time I saw Batman Begins in 2005, I was so engrossed in the story of Bruce Wayne and his training with the League of Shadows, that I completely forgot it was a Batman movie, making his change to Batman even more dramatic and exciting.
I don't mind character development with Bruce Wayne, quite the opposite, I was curious to see how he would cope after the events of TDK, (and those parts were handled terribly, like when the "great lie" was exposed, only to be forgotten about within seconds, leaving no impact on the story whatsoever) but for a Batman movie that is nearly THREE HOURS LONG to have less than 20 minutes of Batman in it, something's wrong.
To focus on a new character like John Blake for such a long period of time, while neglecting the main character, in the finale of the series, yeah, something's wrong.
Catwoman felt shoehorned into the story. Christopher Nolan even said that he didn't even want Catwoman in it. Jonah pressured him into it. Hmmm..
that reminds me of another movie.
The whole thing felt like a pointless retread of Batman Begins.
If Ledger were still alive, I have no doubt TDKR would have been a fantastic film that could have won some Oscars. Instead, Nolan was so shaken up by Ledger's death, that he didn't even want to mention the character he played.
I understand why The Joker wasn't re-cast. Nolan had too much respect for Ledger, and that's fine, but when the characters in TDKR discussed scenes that were directly tied to The Joker in TDKR, I felt like they were tiptoeing around any mention or even reference of The Joker. Like when Blake discussed the Prewitt building scene. Blake didn't think Batman was guilty of killing Dent, and talked about how Batman took down the SWAT Team. He made no mention of The Joker, the one who orchestrated the entire scene, or how strange it was that Batman would go through all the trouble to capture The Joker, and stop him from blowing up the ferries, only to then go and kill the city's DA. It doesn't add up.
The lie that Batman and Gordon covered up, the lie that ate away at Gordon in TDKR, the lie that was exposed by Bane, was directly linked to The Joker, and still, no mention of him. If someone wanted to make a great film, they wouldn't shy away from something so crucial to the story.
For those who say The Joker's story is done, I have this to say: If they can get an actor like Liam Neeson to take the time to make a pointless cameo as Ras in this movie, and get Cillican Murphy to make two pointless cameos in both TDK and TDKR, then they could easily toss in a mention of The Joker, a character who had a far greater impact on the series in general than those other two characters I mentioned.
TDKR was a very flawed movie, IMHO.