Marvel Spider
An Insomniac.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Messages
- 10,119
- Reaction score
- 108
- Points
- 73
Sony's having their Cinemacon presentation right now. I wonder if they'll slip in any ASM2 tidbits. Maybe it's just wishful thinking.
Hahaha, you think awards determine the quality of a movie. When will people learn.
(By the way, not only are awards meaningless a lot of times, but superhero movies are ALWAYS passed up for oscars because idiots don't find them to be "important" subject matter.)
Meh, it was mediocre at worst for me. At its best, it was honestly pretty cool. The best thing that came out of the movie for me imo is I was more excited for the sequel than I ever have been from the first movie in a franchise, although being a Spidey fanboy has a little to do with that. The movie wasn't franchise destroying bad like Green Lantern. If you want a movie thats mediocre at its best (which is probably for like a second), its that movie imo.
There were more than few places where TASM felt more like "lets get this obligatory origin done with" even though they were really hoping not to do that. It got to that mainly because Sony decided to cut all the extra scenes about Peter's parents and such. But they did it, and of course, the story suddenly got a lot more generic. But for a generic story, the acting, dialogue and rest was likable enough for me to accept the characters and come to terms that this movie is never going to be great.
But the sequel showed promise from the second I started thinking about it when I walked out of the theater. And I'm praying it raises the bar as much as I'm hoping it does.
As for safe, I dont care. Anyone who says anything about Avengers story is 'risky' needs their brain checked. That was a pretty safe story and look how entertaining it turned out to be. Safe or not, just make a good movie. They're already going into risky areas with the parents angle.
Hahaha, you think awards determine the quality of a movie. When will people learn.
(By the way, not only are awards meaningless a lot of times, but superhero movies are ALWAYS passed up for oscars because idiots don't find them to be "important" subject matter.)
May I say...I LOVE this. Much better than the blue. Now, besides the white, could we get a hue of green somewhere to reflect the 616 costume?
I don't think anything is franchise killing bad like Green Lantern
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE, son. They are regarded to some as higher than even Oscars that actually care about the quality of a film.
But a simpleton like myself would never get through to you as you have already set it in stone that The Amazing Spider-Man is far superior.
Or...you assume anything that doesn't cater to TAS-M is crap, and that's why you would badmouth AFI.
I'm gonna go with option #2 on that one
i'd save the green for either 1) his eyes, or 2) a discreet iridescence from a black leather costume.
I don't think anything is franchise killing bad like Green Lantern
Batman & Robin would like to have a word with you.
Steven Weintraub ‏@colliderfrosty They also advertised their 2014 films with logos and had a AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 longer logo sequence. But no footage.
Or because when you get down to it most superhero stories are clearly not Oscar worthy.
Or because you don't know what you're taking about
I kinda like the yellow / green a bit better. Its different, at least, and not something we've seen before.
Oh boy, here we go...Or because you don't know what you're taking about
This could be one of the reasons why they would have chosen blue.This would be keep the diversity in characters as oppose to have same color scheme for same color characters(with some variation) from the comics. This means we willl get a different variety of the characters who were green in comics.I like the blue very much as it looks, the green is too reminiscent of The Lizard which was an all green character.