Charlie Boy
Superhero
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 6,302
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Jeff Bridges, Steve Buscemi, John Goodman.
Comic book artists would probably be the first to say that designs created by them or even the legends of the industry (Carmine, The King, Adams ect.) cannot be all translated 100% into live action for a variety of practical reasons and limitations. I also think that they'd be the first to admit whatever similarities the design process for characters and costuming there exists between illustrating comics and actual nuts and bolts designing for tv/movies there's far greater difference than certain fans, even ones familiar with graphic design would know or care to admit.
I myself was pooping on this suit just this morning. After seeing it in different pictures I'm now okay with it. Was I a "better" fan this morning? I don't know, mostly because I'm not sure anyone can really ever judge that, and no matter how you word it, when somebody does that they come off real ugly.
And Zod don't like ugly brothas and sistas! Can I get an Amen?
Very true but The Flash is one of those that, like Spider-Man, needs very little if no tweaking when being brought into live action.
The ways in which real life clashes with comics are innumerable, the people, the physics, the materials, the physiques, the social dynamics... I could go on and on about the ways in which real life clashes with comics. If comics are perfect, then adapting things to real life is detrimental, based on your logic.
Case in point: Has there been a real life adaptation of comics that didn't make detrimental changes, in your opinion?
The source material was written by men, has been changed by men before. It's just a set of ideas, that can be improved upon like virtually every other set of ideas.
You are (almost?) literally worshiping it as perfect, which is absurd, and you refusing to see that, putting your opinion of the source material as the standard for goodness, for 'true fanship,' as though this is fact, is insulting and annoying. And that's not counting when you're actually insulting people. After a point, it becomes a point of ridicule, since there's no point in hanging around being annoyed with your condescension, and we want to talk about the Flash too. To me it makes sense to satirically echo your worship of the source material.
Very true but The Flash is one of those that, like Spider-Man, needs very little if no tweaking when being brought into live action.
You haven't been "defending your opinion", you've been condescending towards anyone who dare say they like the costume.
Multiple times you've taken people's posts about aspects they liked in the costume, and responded with several random, unrelated images
to try to insult their opinion and belittle them for being "wrong" and not "true fans". Usually you follow that up with asmiley, just to really get the point across that you find their very opinions laughable.
If you can't see the difference between the above, and "defending your opinion", then you truly are arrogant beyond all belief.
There are plenty of ideas, designs, and storyarcs in the comics that are perfect for live action and need little to no tweaking, the only things that should be changed are the things that were silly on paper. Based on what you just said a perfect script shouldn't be verbalized and shot in live action because it's not supposed to be because it's in a written format on paper, which is bogus and not at all what I'm saying and you know that.
No I haven't. I've presented logical and reasonable arguments for why I disagree.
Yes, I do find that someone who professes to be a longtime fan of the character prefers the new TV show suit to the overall design that's been used in the comics for nearly 60 years.
According to who?
I do find it very interesting that they changed the symbol from red to white...
The symbol is quite iconic. Isn't it like every episode of Big Bang Theory? I've seen a lot of people wearing Flash t-shirts over the years as well.
Imagine if they changed the colors of Superman's symbol.
Anyone with a functioning brain and is even the least bit artistic.
Here's an idea: ever thought of the possibility this might be a first draft? You know, as in the sense that he won't produce a "perfect" suit off his first try? It's called character development and character progression. There is no reason why he can't "upgrade" to a better suit in the future. The current Spider-Man movies did the same thing.
First, you're dodging the question: Has there been a real life adaptation of comics that didn't make detrimental changes, in your opinion?
Second, I said real life clashes with comics. I didn't say anything about clashing with all things written on paper. And just for the record, no one worships movie scripts enough to put them on a pedestal, they get improved upon in a heartbeat when the filmmakers find out that something clashes with real life, even if it was "perfect on paper."
Anyone with a functioning brain and is even the least bit artistic.
Nope, you haven't been condescending AT ALL. My mistake.
In regards to being called condescending:
And then:
All in the same one post. Amazing.
It's not arrogance. It's fact.
Very true but The Flash is one of those that, like Spider-Man, needs very little if no tweaking when being brought into live action.
Not a damn thing wrong with any of that. All consistent and makes sense. Not sure what your problem is.
After seeing The Flash suit, do you guys want Arrow and The Flash in the MOS universe
It's not arrogance. It's fact.