I thought there was far too much unnecessary CGI, and not enough Cap. This was Avengers 2.5, not Captain America 3. Ant-Man and Spider-Man were great, though. Overall I'd say this movie was overrated, but still a solid 7/10.
It really was, for all intents and purposes, another Avengers movie.
I still rate The Winter Soldier higher because it had a much more focused plot and tighter pace, mostly because it was firmly Cap's story with a small ensemble of supporting characters who all related to Cap in some way.
Civil War had an excess of fan service (look, it's Ant-Man! ermagherd Spider-Man! Plus the entire airport battle was fan ******* fodder)
It's still hella fun, but it gets a little bogged down.
Fan service in a team-up comic book film, who knew!
![]()
HHAHAHAHA OMG! These memes were just what I needed today after a friend committed suicide earlier this week. Keep em coming!
Personally, given the choice between fan service or better-done plot/character arcs, I'd choose the latter.
Eh, I respectfully disagree that this was Avengers 2.5. This movie felt like Captain America 3. 90% of the movie was told through his point of view. Certain scenes shifted focus to other characters but thats normal for any movie. The protagonist doesn't have to be in every scene. Scenes can focus on other characters that center around the main character and have mini arcs of their own. Tony and the Avengers were supporting characters in this movie. If this were Avengers 2.5, the movie's center arc would not have revolved around Cap but rather the team as a whole.
OMG you're a monster.
That's a good point. I never really felt that Tony was driving anything.Captain America and Iron Man may almost have the same amount of screen time, but the thing is MOST of Tony Stark/Iron Man's scenes revolved around Captain America. Ever since he was confronted by the woman by the elevator, his presence in the film was devoted to being on the pro side of the Accords and then eventually trying to stop Bucky and bring Captain America and his team in. It's not like he's just doing his own thing and hogging time in the movie. He's pretty much always reacting to whatever Steve Rogers/Captain America does.
That's a good point. I never really felt that Tony was driving anything.
And it's during that Conversation when T'Challa talks about having considerable reasourcs, widow says it's took the the world seven years to find bucky and so he might be able to do it in half that time. Then T'Challa asks "You know where they are" and she responds "I know somebody who does"....
and I just saw the movie again a couple hours ago.
The movie was fun, and one of the better Marvel movies. But I'd have much preferred a movie about Cap leading the New Avengers throughout the movie with "where's Bucky?" as the central plot.
I must be slow because I can't figure out why she said seven years instead of two years. They started looking for Bucky 5 years before CA:TWS?
Captain America and Iron Man may almost have the same amount of screen time, but the thing is MOST of Tony Stark/Iron Man's scenes revolved around Captain America. Ever since he was confronted by the woman by the elevator, his presence in the film was devoted to being on the pro side of the Accords and then eventually trying to stop Bucky and bring Captain America and his team in. It's not like he's just doing his own thing and hogging time in the movie. He's pretty much always reacting to whatever Steve Rogers/Captain America does.