hopefuldreamer
Clark Kent > Superman
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,766
- Reaction score
- 3,470
- Points
- 103
It's 100% intentional.You can say a lot about Batman & Robin, but not that it’s unfunny, intentionally or not.
The homoerotic imagery?It's 100% intentional.
I’m probably in the minority, but I think Lex should always be in the mix, either as a villain, an uneasy ally, or a mixture of both.Is Lex Luthor the main villain for this movie? And are we going to get Zod again for the sequel? I hope we are not going to be stuck on those two villains for every new version of Superman and never getting past them.
Me too, he's a key supporting character. I'd be disappointed if he was literally not present in a Superman movie.I’m probably in the minority, but I think Lex should always be in the mix, either as a villain, an uneasy ally, or a mixture of both.
That's not a minority opinion in my experience. Not having Lex in a Supes story is like not having Alfred in a Batman story - something would just be missing. Doesn't mean I want him as the Big Bad, but he should always be there in some capacity.I’m probably in the minority, but I think Lex should always be in the mix, either as a villain, an uneasy ally, or a mixture of both.
We get it you watched Challengers.Superman, Lois and Lex. Those three must be in a Superman film.

Are there more Superman stories from this creative team, or was this just a one-time thing?Posting Superman pages/panels I love every day until we get our first official look at David Corenswet as Superman, Day 26:
View attachment 88799
View attachment 88800
View attachment 88801
That's the only one I'm aware of!Are there more Superman stories from this creative team, or was this just a one-time thing?
So has this whole movie been filmed inside so far? How have they not been seen at any outdoor location? Is every background green screen or the volume?
That was never an actual rumor. Just a joke that some portions of the internet took seriously because they can't tell the difference anymore.At least we can dispel the rumor that David was hiding a mullet under that cap.
@flickchick85:That was never an actual rumor. Just a joke that some portions of the internet took seriously because they can't tell the difference anymore.
