Tra-El
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 11,322
- Reaction score
- 4,261
- Points
- 103
View attachment 115543
I think you and I actually agree. Iām probably just doing a crummy job of expressing myself.
I guess Iād say that Snyder used it as a source, the same way that he used DKR, but he misunderstood the themes and story and just plucked the dialogue and/or visuals. It was still an influence. It just wasnāt used well.
It was used well. Zack's dialogue was insanely good. Nothing in these films is a straight up adaption. Watchmen is that only exception and the closest thing that came about was TDKR. Other than that, every single one of these movies are their own story and takes.
Ironically, Zack and James have said the same exact things when it comes to their approach to these films. Right down the center. James mentioned the "sandbox" approach. Zack talked ad-nauseum about that. James mentioned that these versions of characters need to be viewed like the comics and each direction is like an arc, so to speak. Zack said the same. James just said that he isn't focused on world building in his film. That's the exact approach Nolan and Snyder took with their respective DC films. The mindset of "not backing oneself into sequel bait". Tell the story that is supposed to be told first. It all lines up.
Snyder and Gunn may be much more alike than we initially realize. They just look through totally different lenses. As creators and makers of film, that's exactly the way it should be. Not everything is supposed to be the same. We're lucky we have the library that we do. Can it be better? Sure. But for them to take these cracks at it, no matter the swings or misses, is a grateful thing as a fanbase.

