Tacit Ronin
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,527
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 31
If Nolan does refer to past movies, it will be TDK. Not Begins. Begins is completely stand alone. Hell even the titles evoke that.
No it won't. Did the TDK refer to Begins AT ALL? Other than a two second Scarecrow cameo?
Not this trilogy. What did TDK bring back from Begins?
No.
No it won't. Did the TDK refer to Begins AT ALL? Other than a two second Scarecrow cameo?
Not this trilogy. What did TDK bring back from Begins?
Hell, there was no mention of Bruce's parents, a big emotional thread in Begins.
Nolan treats these films as stand alone. You could watch and enjoy TDK without watching a second of Batman Begins.
^
These are YOUR opinions,dear...
Maybe Nolan doesn´t share the same opinion as you.
He knows what is the better for the movie.
In all fairness, Nolan did re-use Rachel Dawes from Batman Begins.
I think one of the big streanghts of TDK was that it worked so well as it's own movie, in fact I know a lot of people who loved TDK that to this day have never seen Batman Begins. For this reason I don't think this movie needs to "Come Full Circle" or at least not iny Ras related respect. I'm all for tying up some themes or ideas perhaps, but I don't think that needs an al Ghul. This is Bruce's story after all, not Ras's.
Nolan also reused Gordon, FOX and Batman OMG!!!
Not the same as bringing the daughter of a dead villain from the first one.
Ra's body was never found. He was never confirmed as dead. For all we know, he could have slipped away and survived that train crash. Who knows.
Well, this trilogy will break that rule I guess?
If Nolan does refer to past movies, it will be TDK. Not Begins. Begins is completely stand alone. Hell even the titles evoke that.
We don't know that. Personally I get this rule and I like it, but harkening back to BB doesn't necessarily mean in terms of Al Ghul's return. The Batcave alone is enough to comply to that rule. If they also mention the parents again, even more so. And if they focus back to Bale in terms of screentime, this also complies to the rule (but in a more technical term).
Seems to me like he is treating Batman Begins as a stand alone prequel and TDK and TDKR as one story. Smart way to avoid the three sequel curse. But if that's true expect no ties to BB.
and this is why none of us are allowed anywhere near a director's chair.
he Batcave alone is enough to comply to that rule.
And if they focus back to Bale in terms of screentime, this also complies to the rule (but in a more technical term).
Not the point I was making. Dead as in narrativley.
Seems to me like he is treating Batman Begins as a stand alone prequel and TDK and TDKR as one story. Smart way to avoid the three sequel curse. But if that's true expect no ties to BB.
Not the point I was making. Dead as in narrativley.
Talia is a very underrating character...that´s why I like her !
I found this:
![]()
The theme of the last two movies is basically esculation, the rise of the freaks. Would be a bit weird if the bunch of ninjas come back into the picture.
Three things this film needs to bring trilogy full arc.
~ the demise of the mob
~ the dominance of the freaks
~ the redemption of batman
The inclusion of the batcave doesn't harken back to Begins. It harkens back to Batman's canon. By your logic TDK harkened back to Begins cause he used the Tumbler.
What does Bale's screentime have to do with Begins?
A secret society of 2000 years of existence like the League of Shadows never would disappear only because their leader was killed.
Never!
Just saying.
uncle Ben and the sandy nature of his killer =/= The frickin' Batcave. The Batcave was present in the 60's Batman and Burton's Batman.Think SM3. The Uncle Ben killer is part of the SM canon. He was absent from SM2 but appeared in SM3 again to tie the trilogy together.