laudanum09
romantysanthrope
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
- Messages
- 898
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
It was mentioned pretty early on by Michael Caine (I think) that the Joker puts on makeup and "just leaves it on - never takes it off."
However, it's clear from the stills that his makeup is not only constantly retouched, but completely removed at one point (funeral scene) and reapplied in later scenes further in the chronology.
These could be plain old continuity issues, funeral scene not withstanding, but I sorta doubt it. Not in this movie.
It would seem that Caine's words were false, unless I'm wrong about the chronology of the film, which could be the case. If anyone has a good answer for this, I'd like to read it.
Caine was making some general comments, he wasn't being specific about the plot and the context of the film. Ledger's makeup goes through all sorts of changes in the film as a result of wear and tear and various other things. Its not a continuity issue since the quote was never meant to be specific about that. once again, caine was just describing the look of the character. If he said "Wow Bale was great as Batman, when he wears that suit he owns it, like he never removes it and its a part of him" This does not mean continuity errors or that he never removes it and it is somehow attached to his skin like a venom suit.
As far as the Joker's scars are concerned, it's been talked into the ground and a lot of people have come up with some pretty plausible theories. I have one more to add to that list.
His scars were caused by an explosive placed inside his mouth.
Ridiculous. I know. I don't know much about ballistics, but I figure that depending on the nature of the device, it could possibly destroy the soft tissue of the cheeks, while only doing minor damage to the teeth and tongue. I don't know what kind of an explosive that would be, but in movie land it could possibly work. It's a relatively implausible idea, but allow me to explain why I came up with it.
I was looking at the recently shared picture of heath with the scar prosthetics on his face. Those are some pretty irregular keloid scars. The wound must have been horrific. If it was deliberately cut, it could have healed that way if it wasn't very well taken care of, but there are some places where it appears that tissue was not only lacerated, but blown away completely in small pieces here and there. It would seem that whatever caused that injury was something quick and powerful, not something slow and deliberate such as the chelsea grin theory, or the self-cut theory.
I think we're reading into it a bit much. I don't really care much for the exact origin of the character since it was apparently something ledger made up, and most likely in a loose way. Most likely they stuck to the TKJ multiple origins story from what we've heard. It may have been cut by a mob boss, a drunk father, or by himself, but I doubt it was by an explosion in his mouth. Perhaps its one of the multiple false stories, but his right side (not ours) looks like it was carved in, the other side might look like an explosion, perhaps, but I think it looks like a knife carving, maybe a bullet. the right side is definitely a cut though. An explosion in the mouth would destroy the lips and the skin right below the nose. imho, its just really unlikely.



