David Rice
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2007
- Messages
- 2,452
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
What'd Not Jake get banned for?
I bet I can guess.
What'd Not Jake get banned for?
I bet I can guess.
Than guess.
Still, even if the status quo will eventually reassert itself, putting the idea down in the first place is stupid.

I'm gonna guess that it was something that didn't deserve banning.
hmmmm, wrong
So then pretty much nothing should ever happen in comics because it's all going to be reverted back to normal. The Riddler should never be a 'good guy' because everyone knows at some point he's going to go rogue again, so they might as well of not written anything. Same with Penguin. Question Fans shouldn't care that Montoya is taking over, because the og question will return sometime down the road, so it wasn't even worth writing for.
In fact, they might as well go back to the 40's format where there wasn't much of an arching storyline and more of one in dones with a baddy of the month, right?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is there any good reason to be cryptic about it?Well, based on your username I'm sure you can figure it out on your own.![]()
If not, then get back to me.
Said the mod.hmmmm, wrong
Again...why the secrecy? Is there a rule against talking about banned users and bannable offenses?Yeah, you're not really a pillar of fairness these days (if you ever were). If anyone's interested in what really happened, either PM Not Jake or myself.
If rules had anything to do with it, then sure...It's just another poster that broke a rule and got punished for it.
Whatever, Grampa.SouLeSS said:Hell, you guys have it easy on this site with how much flaming/offtopic **** is allowed.
Yeah, why do you think I left those sites and ended up here? I like to have fun with people.SouLeSS said:Go to a 'bigboy' site where the mods watch you like hawks and I guarentee you half the "cool" members here would be longggggggggg gone.
Who knows. My first forum experience would have been in early 2001, I think, but that's not my point. My point is, I was just making fun of you for the whole "YEW KIDSH HAVE IT SHO EAZHY...BACK WHERE I CAME FROM BLAH BLAH..."Calling my Grandpa makes no sense, unless you're trying to say that I've been around forums longer than you, which I probably have.
Yeah, those forums are ****ing ******ed and boring to be a part of, because you can't have any fun. I've been there too. Half the reason I lost interest in Metallica was because all the best Metallica sites have *****ebag mods, not least the official site.SouLeSS said:But still, I've been to my fair share of forums where you can't say word one about anything negative without being IP banned.
Yeah, and now it's a ****ing ****ty forum, sounds like.SouLeSS said:Hell, one of my "second-home" forums went from a site where you could basically say what you want and do what you want short of posting warez/porn and no one really cared, to a site where you can't argue with the admins, you must basically suck their teet or be banned. And this happened overnight. Lost a lot of good men that night, but **** happens. It's a ****ing forum.
I'm not quite getting the secrecy either. You may have mistaken me for someone who was doing that.SouLeSS said:If you care so goddamn much that you have to hold a little nugget of info like "the real reason why someone was banned" over other people, then you have a serious problem.
I don't even know the guy. I think we vaguely don't get along well, if we interact at all. I couldn't point you to a single thing I remember the guy saying. I'd just be willing to bet that he didn't deserve it.SouLeSS said:Also, regardless of what you know, the main reason he was banned was probably because he broke some rule, and his friends/him go off about how he "didn't do anything" and "didn't deserve this".
Seriously? Even though the forum edits it automatically?Swearing is a bannable offense, you know.
![]()
Seriously? I have no idea. It's mentioned in the rules, but--Seriously? Even though the forum edits it automatically?
--who even knows what this means.SHH! FAQs said:Excessive language is not tolerated. Inappropriate language is automatically filtered. Inappropriate context, however, is not, but still should not be used. Bypassing the filter may result in either a warning or automatic probation. Repeated violations of this rule may result in account banning.
Most probably wouldn't give a s**t. Loeb might be a little miffed, Ross might definitely be miffed, or not. Whatever goes down, will matter little in the long run when everything reverts back to status quo. Could be right after Final Crisis, could take a year or two. But eventually, it all goes back to the way it was. So, why care?
Seriously? I have no idea. It's mentioned in the rules, but--
--who even knows what this means.