The Official 'Thor Rate & Review' thread - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
ClarkLuthor, I wouldn't use the word 'phony' to describe 99% of film romance; 'idealized' is a much better and more accurate term/description of what most films tend to do when it comes to handling romance and romantic attraction.

I personally find it somewhat weird and incongruous (as previously noted) that people are criticizing Thor - rather than praising it - for bucking that trend, but to each their own, as they say.
 
Hiddleston was good but I didn't see anything exceptional in his performance. Ledger, OTOH, was mesmerizing in every scene of his. That's the big reason his character has become a pop culture icon.
 
FTR, I don't see how it's insulting Ledger to say the Hiddleston's performance was on par. I just meant to say that Hiddleston was brilliant, and by far the best villian performance in any Marvel film. In fact it's more a compliment to Ledger if you think about it.
I second that, although James Franco was really good in the Spiderman movies, from friend to villain. I mean SM3 was bad, but he acted very well.
Hiddleston was good but I didn't see anything exceptional in his performance. Ledger, OTOH, was mesmerizing in every scene of his. That's the big reason his character has become a pop culture icon.
He did go overboard with the lip licking though. Just saying.
 
FTR, I don't see how it's insulting Ledger to say the Hiddleston's performance was on par. I just meant to say that Hiddleston was brilliant, and by far the best villian performance in any Marvel film. In fact it's more a compliment to Ledger if you think about it.

The bolded part, times INFINITY! The Red Skull, as much as I adore Weaving, has a ways to go to match the bar Hiddleston set.
 
You're wrong! No comparison! Hiddleston isn't famous, and Ledger haunted peoples' dreams!!! Their DREEEAAAAAMMS!!!!

:cwink:

ROTFL!!!!

Thanks Chewy, I was grumpy when I read those other posts, but this really cheered me up!

Thanks mate! <fist bump>
 
Hiddleston was good but I didn't see anything exceptional in his performance. Ledger, OTOH, was mesmerizing in every scene of his. That's the big reason his character has become a pop culture icon.
But, but ... Hiddleston as Loki was just so ... memorable. Instant cinematic classic. Don't you see the critics lining up to praise such a significant performance?!!!

:dry:

jk
 
is there like a Leadger beeper on hype that goes off everytime someone mentions his name. I swear every thread I read his name comes up followed by 5 pages of people calling him the god of comic villians. I think he was good in his movie, I also thought Hidderson(eh spelling) was good in his move. that should be the end right there. If you dont agree thats fine. But can we stop making every conversation on hype about Ledger
 
But, but ... Hiddleston as Loki was just so ... memorable. Instant cinematic classic. Don't you see the critics lining up to praise such a significant performance?!!!

:dry:

jk

And who said it was an instant classic?
 
Hiddleston was good but I didn't see anything exceptional in his performance. Ledger, OTOH, was mesmerizing in every scene of his. That's the big reason his character has become a pop culture icon.

While I didn't think he was up there with Ledger, I walked out of the theater impressed with his performance and thought he nailed Loki perfectly. He had a lot of little nuances, like the look Loki had at Thor's coronation. No words needed.

I second that, although James Franco was really good in the Spiderman movies, from friend to villain. I mean SM3 was bad, but he acted very well.

I loved Franco in Spider-Man 2 and expected him to take it to the next level in Spider-Man 3. Too bad the script and direction didn't let him. :csad:
 
I'm not saying that I wanted to see the bestest romance of all time or anything but I do think that it could have been a little better than "Thor is so hurt and misses Jane because he talked to her over a fire and kissed her back once.

I would have been fine with them saying that it was a flirtation and budding romance but they made Thor act liked he loved her and would miss her so much at the end of the film. If that didn't exist I wouldn't even be commenting on the romance angle.
 
is there like a Leadger beeper on hype that goes off everytime someone mentions his name. I swear every thread I read his name comes up followed by 5 pages of people calling him the god of comic villians. I think he was good in his movie, I also thought Hidderson(eh spelling) was good in his move. that should be the end right there. If you dont agree thats fine. But can we stop making every conversation on hype about Ledger

Blame the bat fanboys, I think.:yay:
 
The bolded part, times INFINITY! The Red Skull, as much as I adore Weaving, has a ways to go to match the bar Hiddleston set.
Yep. I remember a few weeks back when a few people were wondering why Marvel was confident enough with him to make him the primary antagonist in the Avengers before they saw how audiences reacted to him in Thor. I think in hindsight no one will question the decision :yay:
 
Didn't I just warn people? That's an infraction.
Wait ... he called me an ass clown and a world class *******, and I get the infraction? Riiiight.

Non bias officiating there, my dude. Good call.

Infraction me Mr. Hall Monitor.
 
And who said it was an instant classic?
It was said to be on par with an instant cinematic classic performance, though?

Anyway, I'm down with this conversation. It's ridiculous, and I'm being ganged up on by hurt fans, and one who has a moderating badge.

I will gladly fall back now. haha
 
I SEE SPIDEY: I don't want to start a fight/argument, but your post is a perfect example of trying to fit/quantify something as unpredictable as love into a predictable formula/'box'. Thor's behavior does suggest that he fell for Jane extremely hard despite only knowing her for a short time, but that doesn't automatically mean that he was portrayed in an unrealistic manner, because, quite frankly, stuff like that happens all the time.
 
I'm not saying that I wanted to see the bestest romance of all time or anything but I do think that it could have been a little better than "Thor is so hurt and misses Jane because he talked to her over a fire and kissed her back once.

I would have been fine with them saying that it was a flirtation and budding romance but they made Thor act liked he loved her and would miss her so much at the end of the film. If that didn't exist I wouldn't even be commenting on the romance angle.
He was more hurt about that whole Loki thing. He missed Jane but he wasn't overboard upset about it, just sad he couldn't see her again. Kind of like when an individual you like stands you up for a third date. It's not going to kill you but it's a bummer.
 
Yep. I remember a few weeks back when a few people were wondering why Marvel was confident enough with him to make him the primary antagonist in the Avengers before they saw how audiences reacted to him in Thor. I think in hindsight no one will question the decision :yay:

Totally. We walked out of Thor pretty darn happy about Hiddleston's role in The Avengers. Basically, TH left us wanting a lot more Loki. But what can I say? Bad guys with massive daddy issues always get to me :woot:
 
I also loved Hiddleston in the after credits scene where he [blackout]appears in that glass as a reflection and says: "well i guess it's worth a look" with such an evil smile on his face. So awesome! [/blackout]
 
Last edited:
is there like a Leadger beeper on hype that goes off everytime someone mentions his name. I swear every thread I read his name comes up followed by 5 pages of people calling him the god of comic villians. I think he was good in his movie, I also thought Hidderson(eh spelling) was good in his move. that should be the end right there. If you dont agree thats fine. But can we stop making every conversation on hype about Ledger

Agreed with that and sorry I brought up the comparison. I only mentioned it because to my knowledge he's the only guy to get an oscar for a comic book movie roll.
 
OK, saw the movie on Friday and I am just now able to write my review of the film. After a couple of days to reflect, I still feel that this is a great Thor movie and a great comic book movie. I gave it a 9/10. Marvel has really hit their stride with Thor as it strikes just the right note between fun fantasy film and epic action-adventure with touches of comedy, romance, and drama. This could've easily come off as cheesy or silly, but Branagh wears the material confidently like a fine suit and struts around for all to see.

This is really a coming out party, not only for Hemsworth but for Hiddleston as well. Both are little known foreign actors but their performances in Thor easily raise their status in Hollywood. Hemsworth certainly looks the part, but the question was whether or not he would have the gravitas to carry this film. He answers with a resounding "YES!" He really bring the brash arrogance to Thor but he does so in a way that is still likeable. He revels in being a warrior and he yearns to prove himself worthy of being king but he never comes off as self-centered. He competently displays courage, respect, and chivalry.

As good as Hemsworth is, Hiddleston steals the show. What I love about his character and how he played him is that even though we know that Loki is the antagonist, he was able to manipulate my feelings as a viewer into believing he was on Thor's side for a good bit of the movie. Loki is extremely cunning and has the ability to use words to manipulate other characters, Hiddleston did this flawlessley. In addition, Hiddleston brought a seething rage to the character that was on full display in his scene with Odin, probably my favorite of the movie. There is bitterness and resentment there that has been festering under the surface for a very long time.

The romance, for all the talk of it being rushed, felt very natural to me. I can see where the opinion is coming from since it seems to develop in a matter of a couple of days, but while watching the movie it was never a distraction. It worked for me and that is probably due to the chemistry between Hemsworth and Portman. I may have felt different with a different character but I think Thor lends himself easily to this type of quick attraction as he is in very good condition, but more than that he is curteous and chivalrous towards Jane Foster. She is already fascinated by the questions surrounding his appearance and his qualities quickly spark her feeling for him and vice versa.

I thought the action was great, very well done. My only quibble was that I felt the Destroyer scene could've used a little more time and probably a little more resistance by the Warriors Three. They didn't seem to have a very good showing at all in this scene, with Fandral and Hogun really doing nothing. Other than that, the action was well-paced and Thor's power was depicted very well. Thor's re-emergence in New Mexico during the Destroyer battle gave me goose bumps.

As for the larger MCU and the way it was handled in this movie, seamless. Thor definitely feels part of this universe and SHIELD's inclusion was done very well and felt like it was a necessary part of the story. I just think that Marvel Studios is feeling very comfortable telling the stories they want to tell. They are having fun bringing these characters to life and not worrying too much about some of the more outlandish aspects of them. Marvel seems perfectly content to let the audience accept the characters for who they are and we are being greatly rewarded for it. I hope I will be able to see it again soon, as it is just such a fun ride to be on.
 
It was said to be on par with an instant cinematic classic performance, though?

Anyway, I'm down with this conversation. It's ridiculous, and I'm being ganged up on by hurt fans, and one who has a moderating badge.

I will gladly fall back now. haha

there's nothing classic ledger's joker. Far from that,kid.
 
He was more hurt about that whole Loki thing. He missed Jane but he wasn't overboard upset about it, just sad he couldn't see her again. Kind of like when an individual you like stands you up for a third date. It's not going to kill you but it's a bummer.
He needs to go to a bar and get [BLACKOUT]hammered[/BLACKOUT]. He'll get over it.

:awesome::awesome::awesome:
 
I also loved Hemsdel in the after credits scene where he [blackout]appears in that glass as a reflection and says: "well i guess it's worth a look" with such an evil smile on his face. So awesome! [/blackout]

Who's Hemsdel?
 
^ Mr. Earle was confusing Hiddleston and Hemsworth, I believe.

Something interesting that I just realized: the actors who play Thor, Odin, and Loki all have last names that begin with 'H' (Chris Hemsworth, Anthony Hopkins, and Tom Hiddleston). That's a pretty neat little touch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,317
Messages
22,084,717
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"