The Rebooted "Keep Hope Alive" (that the rights can revert back to Marvel) Thread - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 24

[Erik Lensherr]

Michael Fassbender as Reed Richards or Dr. Doom would be great.

 

[Willie Lumpkin]

Michael Fassbender as Reed Richards or Dr. Doom would be great.

Yeah, I had crossed him off the list because of Magneto, but I'd love to see him do either of those if he was interested.

 

[Detective Conan]

Oscar Isaac as Reed Richards please.

Also think he’d be a good Wolverine as well.

 

[wobbly]

He'd be better for Wolverine imo.

 

[Dark Raven]

Well I don't want to see Miles Teller showing up as anyone. Or Jamie Bell for that matter.

Ioan Gruffudd needs some work. He would've been better now as Reed Richards than he was back in 2005. Every other role he's played outside of Fantastic Four has seemed more like Reed Richards.

Maybe he could be Professor X?

 

[SumT]

having Fox's XMen actors suddenly in the upcoming Marvel movies would give me memories of Fox's XMen all over again.

so I really really hope Marvel waits some years (a lot) to bring some of them to their universe. and in any case, to another property, a random one. neither in Avengers, a solo avenger movie or f4 please. and of course not x-men again. no man.

 

[Dark Raven]

having Fox's XMen actors suddenly in the upcoming Marvel movies would give me memories of Fox's XMen all over again.

so I really really hope Marvel waits some years (a lot) to bring some of them to their universe. and in any case, to another property, a random one. neither in Avengers, a solo avenger movie or f4 please. and of course not x-men again. no man.

For the MCU, it will be Michael Fassbender as Professor X, James McAvoy as Magneto, Jennifer Lawrence as Jean Grey, Sophie Turner as Mystique etc. Will definitely be the All New, All Different X-Men.

 

[Darkprime]

McAvoy as Doom/Magneto and Fassbender as Professor X would be hilarious. But Fassbender as Reed is something I hadn't considered before as someone mentioned earlier. Now that would be interesting.

 

[SumT]

For the MCU, it will be Michael Fassbender as Professor X, James McAvoy as Magneto, Jennifer Lawrence as Jean Grey, Sophie Turner as Mystique etc. Will definitely be the All New, All Different X-Men.

multiple suicides would happen if that day comes (mine included)

 

[Spiderine]

Gonna be cool to get villains like Apocalypse on the big screen since we never got him before.

 

[Darkprime]

Gonna be cool to get villains like Apocalypse on the big screen since we never got him before.

Yea it was weird seeing Ivan Ooze in a X-Men movie .

 

[Iceman]

Michael Fassbender as Reed Richards or Dr. Doom would be great.

He would be a good pick for either. I wonder if any Fox actors will actually manage to get a MCU role. Could be interesting.

 

[KBX]

Not surprised. It goes in line with Evans and MBJ getting new roles. Though I wish Marvel could get Hugh Jackman as citizen #3 in Endgame just to mess with people and cause rapid specualation for the next 3 years lol.

McCoy, Fassbender, Chastain, Isaac for anyone, but let’s keep away from JLaw

 

[Marvel united]

Fassbender could be a great Doom but I don't know if Marvel would want him in a role so similar to Magneto. Maybe Fassbender as Moon Knight, Black Knight or Captain Britain and McAvoy as Starfox?

Sheridan as Iron Lad and Smitt-McPhee as Wiccan

 

[Zyraquis]

Was told that the list of countries approval was disclosed by DIS law firm in its submission in Brazil page 16 to clear any doubt.

https://sei.cade.gov.br/sei/modulos...ilX3Nmg9_6hfzD9_ZkZc1yacBmJtwBtH2vBR9QfA_eWbX

fWIW the CMA is probably not reviewing it from the competition angle (which is EC) but perhaps media plurality POV like what Austria did and approved even it is also part of EU. I myself am not sure whether CMA needs to clear it just from people following this deal.

2018 - Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde

 

[The Infernal]

Yea it was weird seeing Ivan Ooze in a X-Men movie .

What was really weird was seeing in the run up to Apocalypse Fox defenders say things like "he looks rubbish just like the comics so you should like it" as though they never cared for the source material.

 

[Dark Raven]

What was really weird was seeing in the run up to Apocalypse Fox defenders say things like "he looks rubbish just like the comics so you should like it" as though they never cared for the source material.

It wasn't that different from all the FFINO defenders who would always move the goalposts for everything about that production. Stuff like "well I never really liked so-and-so's look in the comics anyway so this is an improvement" or "I like this interesting gritty take doing something else with the FF" or "I don't care if this movie is crap, I still want it to do well", or "I'm going to see this movie 10 times!"

 

[Xeno]

He'd be better for Wolverine imo.

Oscar Isaac is Reed Richards. Period. Finis. The End.

Besides, Daniel Radcliffe has Wolverine in the bag.

 

[The Infernal]

It wasn't that different from all the FFINO defenders who would always move the goalposts for everything about that production. Stuff like "well I never really liked so-and-so's look in the comics anyway so this is an improvement" or "I like this interesting gritty take doing something else with the FF" or "I don't care if this movie is crap, I still want it to do well", or "I'm going to see this movie 10 times!"

I think one user even put out two great reviews for it in the day it released.

 

[metaphysician]

I think it has become quite clear that quite a lot of the pro-Fox advocacy had nothing to do with the X-Men or FF movies being good, and everything to do with spiting Marvel.

 

[Willie Lumpkin]

That adds an interesting dimension to Marvel's strategy on new X-Films. Will there be old-timers who refuse to accept anything new from Marvel and spend a lot of effort crapping on things online regarding new Marvel X-films? It may seem like a minor detail, but since the vast majority of people are generally neutral, a small number of loud, zealous people willing to invest the time to post negative comments on multiple websites could steer conversations and create bad publicity.

Marvel will probably hold back a bit and introduce mutants slowly to avoid confusion with previous films, but they may also need to consider angry X-Fans who may be reluctant to accept the new reality.

 

[Bach]

It wasn't that different from all the FFINO defenders who would always move the goalposts for everything about that production. Stuff like "well I never really liked so-and-so's look in the comics anyway so this is an improvement" or "I like this interesting gritty take doing something else with the FF" or "I don't care if this movie is crap, I still want it to do well", or "I'm going to see this movie 10 times!"

The people that watched Venom acted in exactly the same way. Now thanks to them that garbage is getting a sequel.

 

[Endeavor]

That adds an interesting dimension to Marvel's strategy on new X-Films. Will there be old-timers who refuse to accept anything new from Marvel and spend a lot of effort crapping on things online regarding new Marvel X-films? It may seem like a minor detail, but since the vast majority of people are generally neutral, a small number of loud, zealous people people willing to invest the time to post negative comments on multiple websites could steer conversations and create bad publicity.

Marvel will probably hold back a bit and introduce mutants slowly to avoid confusion with previous films, but they may also need to consider angry X-Fans who may be reluctant to accept the new reality.

I doubt it.
Real fans of the characters might have some leftover senseless nostalgia-based anger at first, but will react positively when they see their beloved characters treated the way they were always meant to be. Those that we know are not true X-Men fans, but just FOX contrarians, will not cease their attacks. But that will not damage these future movies and it will not make Marvel Studios flinch. They will let the quality of their work speak for itself.
Let them share their discontent. The majority of people will see through it and I know it certainly won't affect me. All I care about are all these great characters treated fairly.

 

[Endeavor]

The people that watched Venom acted in exactly the same way. Now thanks to them that garbage is getting a sequel.

I still haven't seen it. Waiting for it to be free to watch.

 

[Dark Raven]

The people that watched Venom acted in exactly the same way. Now thanks to them that garbage is getting a sequel.

That's what FFINO defenders wanted for Fant4stic. First of all, they wanted us to go and see the movie in theatres for ourselves despite all the awful trailers and everything else leading up to it. We couldn't form a judgment based on anything else apart from our own viewing experience. But by that time it would be too late if everyone went to see it. The studios don't care whether you like it or not. They only care about bums on seats. Getting people in there to make up those numbers, whatever the reason, is all they care about.

And then when those numbers show up as being high, then it tells them that the film is doing well, so they think that what they've put out is actually good. Then it's rinse and repeat for a sequel. Especially if FFINO defenders were going to see it 10 times and would've reviewed it highly simply for the sake of doing that.

But maybe more people saw sense with Fant4stic than with Venom? Or maybe it was because of films like Fant4stic failing that it spurred people on to try harder for future films?