Willie Lumpkin
Trophy Husband
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
- Messages
- 14,086
- Reaction score
- 2,583
- Points
- 103
They'd be legally obligated to do so, so it's not for nothing. Did Fox give up Daredevil and Elektra for nothing? No they darn well didn't. They legally had no control over the film rights anymore. Contractual law isn't nothing.
Ego/power set switches are a bit different than granting Marvel shared control of Fantastic Four and X-Men.
But Fox thought they would retain the Daredevil/Elektra when they made their Daredevil film. When that fell apart, they were stuck.
This case is different. Shareholders and management do not want to see another FF film, so that means management has a fiduciary duty to at least try to get something for the rights before they revert for nothing.
Feige's comments indicate Marvel recognizes Fox's predicament and they're just going to wait it out... or he and Marvel are simply posturing and trying to maintain a strong bargaining position.
I believe some sort of deal is likely before the reversion date because it would be worth something to Marvel to lock down the rights sooner rather than later and Fox should take anything they can get.
At this point it has to be a matter of Fox believing they can get more than Marvel is currently willing to offer. When Fox becomes convinced Marvel will never go higher than whatever deal is currently on the table (and it's Feige's job to convince them they're at that point) they have to take that deal.
