You areby suggesting that the TDK suit is an entirely new concept when both the idea and the materials have been discussed here on these very boards for well over eight years.
Near enough.
Regardless of what you think, that is not what I said. The B:IG image is proof of an idea that existed before Hollywood thought to make it a reality. For you this coming together is revolutionary and new; for me it is simply Hollywood catching up. Now if you want to caveat this in the context of costume construction then fine lets just leave it at that and call it a day.
Your logic. Your words. Not mine. I never said the TDK suit was old news. I said there was nothing revolutionary about the concept of moto-bike armor over mesh, which is true... then we started taking about tailoring.
True, true... but Im not the only one.
Now, now, lets be honest here... there was more than a just little bit of glorification in your remarks regarding the TDK suit. And thats fine...
... I just dont buy into that everybody gets a medal mentality.
Dont give me that hater crap. And as for these proposed facts of mine: a) the TDK costume designers did not invent polyester mesh, b) the TDK costume designers did not invent moto-bike armor, c) there is nothing novel about using mesh (or mail as we thought of it) for the undersuit. These are not my personal feelings. These are truths.
Good for them... they finally got around to doing something weve been talking about for years. The Academy should give them the Oscar. Whats that? Not even nominated? But that thing was revolutionary!!!
Everybody gets a medal.
You sound like a child who hasn't gotten his way.
I say the costume was made a certain way...you rebut by saying yea but they didn't invent this or that.
I try to comment on technique, and you say I'm glorifying the suit.
...and because you've been
talking about something for years, and now that Hollywood has done it in a completely different way or at the very least - loosely related... it's no longer revolutionary? C'mon, get over yourself.
I was fine with our back and fourth until this last post of yours. I'm perfectly cool with differing opinions...but your problem is that you speak as if you personally...not the Batman fan base - but YOU are entitled to what you and only you want and believe.
You have absolutely no sense of open-mindedness...and cannot get past your own personal feelings towards the suit...and are far too incapable of not passing judgement on anything even remotely related to the TDK suit.
You want me to accept your views and opinions while you draw conclusions on mine when all I did was talk about how it was made...because you say there was a sense of glorification in my words!? Let me tell you something...What you call glorification, I call respect.
You've apparently 'talked' about something for years....let me emphasize
talked about... and now that Hollywood does something loosely related to something you've been
'talking' about, by you it's 'nothing new'.
Wow, so every sci-fi writer out there has basically stolen the thunder of any new invention or concept that actually becomes reality...because they talked about it first...get over yourself dude.
If you can't have a conversation or a discussion without being condescending, judgmental or over-glorifying yourself because you 'talked' about something that in some small way became a reality years later then simply put and respectfully...you're nothing more than a troll.
I was talking technique...costume making and costume comparisons....but according to you that's not OK because you dislike the TDK suit. Talk about beating a dead horse...
David