I can find TONS of spinning kick KO videos from karate and UFC tourney's on youtube. Not only KO's, but kicks(spinning and regular) that are used in general form.Is there a reason your completely misrepresenting his argument? Moral didn't say "LOL, KICKS DON'T WORK ZOMG." He said that the spinning kicks in Arkham Asylum do not have practical fighting applications; you'd never see them used in a fight. Not all kicks are equal; the ones Moral is talking about are for show only.
Here's a fun experiment, Earle: count the elbows strikes.
It's three, max--and I think two of those are actually forearm strikes.

Spinning kicks are effective but should be used sparingly. When successfully utilized it's practically a KO. If missed, you leave yourself incredibly vulnerable for those precious few seconds that it would take to turn the fight completely against you.
I can find TONS of spinning kick KO videos from karate and UFC tourney's on youtube. Not only KO's, but kicks(spinning and regular) that are used in general form.
Here's a fun experiment, Earle: count the elbows strikes.
Yep.Bourne. Bourne. Bourne.
Well, let me say I'm sorry I can't find any videos of someone using a spin kick while being jumped in a real fight.Yes, I'm sure you can--but that's a tournament environment, which is different. I can't speak for Moral, but I was speaking with regards to my experience in practical self-defense training. Simply put: I was taught those kind of maneuvers, and I might have even employed them in a competitive environment--but not in self defense and not in a real fight.
The defense of this argument was that spinning kicks were just for show, but I've seen fights on TV where it wasn't for show, but to win the fight. (shown above)
Here's a fun experiment, Earle: count the elbows strikes.
It's three, max--and I think two of those are actually forearm strikes.
Btw realism fans, explain to me how Batman bends the barrel of that gun when that gadget only works as a clenching hand. His whole arm would need to be mechanical for him to do that.
Also, if Batman and Nolan are so obsessed with practicality and speed, why do they do all those fast take downs and yet they dont use knock out gas, sedative darts, tazers or a gas mask? Is Batman making things harder for himself on purpose?
OH NOES, MY BATMAN MOVIE IS NOT REALISTIC!!!
I'm sorry, I'm trying really hard not to be a jerk here, but this is incredibly tiresome: I just finished explaining in the post you quoted that I'm speaking of my experience only, and that other martial arts may be different. So, let's review:Well, let me say I'm sorry I can't find any videos of someone using a spin kick while being jumped in a real fight.The defense of this argument was that spinning kicks were just for show, but I've seen fights on TV where it wasn't for show, but to win the fight. (shown above)
Just because you, or someone else, wasn't trained to use spin kicks, doesn't mean it's not used in training(there are a lot of different fighting techniques/training).
Because it's a competitive sport environment. You argue that a competitive fight is a "real fight," but it's not, not in the ways that matter most. It's important to recognize that the goal of a real fight, the demands of a real fight, the dangers of a real fight, and the tools you have at your disposal in a real fight are extremely different than a competitive fight.Fighters don't use non-practical means to win fights, they use what training they feel is necessary, and I'll take that from professionals I see in videos, then what I gather from some bat-fans on a forum. And these tourneys are real fights, this isn't WCW/WWF(E), these people are in it to win. So I don't know why you're trying to negate a spin kick being used in a tourney?
Yes, I'm aware that a movie is, in fact, a movie. As a movie, it has goals that may or may not be served by more or less elaborate fights. Practicality informs these scenes in these movies; if that's not to your liking, or if you feel that there more emphasis on practicality then there needs to be, that is fine. I'm not arguing against your preferences; I am only talking about something I think may have informed their decision making process.I don't see a Batman movie as such. The point, is that spin kicks are used, and have practical purposes to take people out. Sure, they can be "just for show", but they clearly have real word applications to their attack. And again, this is a movie, it's not real. Someone fighting in a 50-60 pound suit will probably go down fast while being jumped by 1-2 guys.
THere werent many, perhaps even none, but this was one of the better fights. Watch the fundraiser fight where Batman keeps his elbows high and walks up to people to hit them in the head.
There's also the opening fight vs the Chechen's thugs where they come one by one and he takes them down this some ridiculous moves. The last one of them actually has a gun and walks right up to him so that Batman can snatch it and pimp slap him unconsious. Lol he can barely move in the Begins suit.
I dont know if Keysi works like that, or if its practical or whatever, i just enjoy a more open fighting style.
I agree. Knockout gas would have been a good choice to take out the Joker and his thugs during the penthouse party fight.![]()

Wouldn't that have affected the other people there too?![]()
Wouldn't that have affected the other people there too?![]()

t:
No you didn't, this all started, because you said:I'm sorry, I'm trying really hard not to be a jerk here, but this is incredibly tiresome: I just finished explaining in the post you quoted that I'm speaking of my experience only, and that other martial arts may be different. So, let's review:
Saint: "This is my experience only; other arts may employ more elaborate self-defense techniques."
Travesty: "Other martial arts might be different."
Yeah, that's why I wrote that.
Then, I presented my videos, where you then tried to shoot it down, by saying it's not valid, because it's a tournament setting. Why this makes a difference, I still don't know, even after your long explanation, it still doesn't make sense, seeing as it's still a fight to win. And since you CLEARLY said that it wasn't practical, yet it can be at times to knock people out, I'm having a hard time understating your defense, other than you wanting to be right. You were making it out to be all about "show", even though there's technique around it that you are obviously denying, but at the same time, not denying.Saint said:Is there a reason your completely misrepresenting his argument? Moral didn't say "LOL, KICKS DON'T WORK ZOMG." He said that the spinning kicks in Arkham Asylum do not have practical fighting applications; you'd never see them used in a fight. Not all kicks are equal; the ones Moral is talking about are for show only.

Because it's a competitive sport environment. You argue that a competitive fight is a "real fight," but it's not, not in the ways that matter most. It's important to recognize that the goal of a real fight, the demands of a real fight, the dangers of a real fight, and the tools you have at your disposal in a real fight are extremely different than a competitive fight.
And I quote, "spinning kicks in Arkham Asylum do not have practical fighting applications; you'd never see them used in a fight", yet, video evidence contradicts you, regardless of your tired "competitive" explanations. That's not what you originally said, nor should it matter. It's a fight, and is completely applicable, along with video evidence. Sorry.....Nobody punches you in the groin in competition, nobody chokes you in competition, and nobody picks up a lead pipe and hits you over the head in competition. Nobody is trying to maim you or kill you or knock you unconscious and drag you off to be raped. These are competitive fights with rules and regulations and systems in place to keep people from getting seriously injured. They are designed for sport and for entertainment, and that alone separates them, absolutely, from a "real fight."
"Not necessarily"? The fact is that you can use it to knock somebody out, especially someone who is as trained as Batman, I would imagine that this shouldn't be an issue. What are you missing here? Batman is a trained fighter/ninja who can roundhouse people. What's wrong here?The technique you use for sport and entertainment is not necessarily the technique you use to defend yourself against the guy who has nothing stopping him from kicking you in the balls or gouging your eyes--the guy who isn't an athlete in an entertainment industry. Hell, probably every self-defense technique I ever learned included a maneuver that would be illegal in these tournaments, including the UFC.
Let me get this straight: You understand that Batman has used such a technique on someone in BB(which you never brought up until now), and yet, you're arguing with me that it's not something that could be used by him?You've interpreted my argument as being that spinning kicks shouldn't be in these movies, but I'm not saying that. Batman uses such a kick on a ninja in Batman Begins, and it was just fine. I'm just trying to add some perspective to the discussion.
I'm sorry, that's not "perspective", that's just you trying really hard to win an argument that shouldn't have gone this far to begin with.Frankly, I'm surprised Batman doesn't use flashbangs. Flashbangs seem like the ultimate tool for his surprise attacks on armed enemies. Maybe they felt it would make him too much like a SWAT guy.
I suppose Batman would be concerned about badguys firing blindly, actually. A shot fired blindly is more dangerous to potential innocents than a shot fired directly at Batman.