I like Marvel, I like D.C.
As and characters I to Marvel more.
In Films I D.C. a bit more, mostly because of Nolan's work. Avengers looks like a pop-corn film (maybe) Good time.
Thor nearly put me to sleep; I don't want to see another like Thor ever again.
The Trailer doesn't really show this movie has any plot; I look forward to something that implies there's a cohesive story to Avengers.
I think the reason for the trailer looking like that was to appeal to people who liked mindless action, saving the story explanation for the next trailer. Disney's clever with their marketing. I mean, they got Pirates 3 to make tons of money. Hell, even Cars 2 made 550 mil, and it's considered Pixar's worst movie.
I lean towards Marvel myself, for films. Outside of Batman, DC hasn't really done honestly anything good in the past decade that the public actually took notice of. Catwoman, Jonah Hex, Green Lantern, etc, or particularly financially successful besides arguably Superman Returns.
Yeah, Nolan's Batman films are good, but that's not because of DC, that's because A: Great actors. B: Great visual style. and C: Batman's already massive popularity. Batman was a popular superhero long before the film came out. The thing is, though, DC has only made two superheroes into good films: Superman and Batman. They then proceeded to run BOTH of those franchises straight into the ground after a popular, well-received sequel.
I don't mean to sound like I'm trolling, but Marvel just seems to have better control of what they're doing. Sure they can play it safe a lot, but that's because the whole concept of building up to the Avengers is completely ruined if even one of the films fails financially.
The thing is, Batman can support himself because he's Batman, save the few cases where someone screws him up to the point of almost TRYING to make it suck (1997 WB, I'm looking at you). But they keep pulling him out over and over again to the point where even after TDK, I can't get really hyped for TDKR because even though it's a drastically different take on the characters, because I know that as long as the Batman films keep making big hits the rest of the DC characters suffer as a result. Hell, the only reason the Batfilms are good was because WB didn't try to interfere with Nolan like they did with Schumacher.
I mean, sure it's Batman and he's awesome, but it's like 'Oh. DC's making another Batman film. AGAIN.'
With Marvel, there's an actual shot for these characters. Iron Fist, Guardians of the Galaxy, even the ****ing Inhumans have been rumored to get a film. Hell, it's heavily rumored Doc Strange will get the first slot for the 2014 schedule. DC has great heroes, so why aren't characters like Wonder Woman or Aquaman (attitude from JL/JLU + Gold/orange Atlantean armor= ****ing GOLD!), or hell, even Wonder Woman, one of DC's big three and the most recognizable female superhero!
I was excited for Green Lantern for a long while, because I thought it meant finally WB/DC were getting their **** together and trying something new for once, finally making a Supehero film that isn't related to Superman or Batman.
And then I heard a Hawkman film was being written, I was even happier, because it meant they were actively exploring other heroes for films, which they hadn't done before...really ever.
Aaaand then GL failed and Hawkman was never heard about again.
I just can't feel that it'll justify DC just not giving a **** about it's other heroes. It certainly doesn't seem Batman is going to help bring smaller heroes to the screen like Iron Man did.