I really like Bane's costume. The mask is genius. It's threatening, mysterious and is a clever homage to the original luchador design.
The coat is just classy and I like the worn-in, cobbled together look of his clothing.
Hardy himself is perfectly cast and really feels intimidating.
However.
Nolan has demonstrated once again that he is clueless when it comes to character design. He has no visual flair in that department whatsoever. Don't get me wrong, Nolan is great when it comes to creating beautiful scenes (thanks to the help of wally Pfister), with great camera angles and expert use of the IMAX camera. He is obviously well-trained and knowledgable about film.
But have you ever noticed that everybody in Nolan films wear suits? And how most characters have that slicked back hair? Yeah, most of his films have characters where it makes sense for them to wear suits, but it's becoming like dark eyeshadow is for Tim Burton. Most of his characters look the same, and it's only the Batman films where he has characters that look in any way distinct, and that's because he is adapting characters designed by other people.
Batman himself is stiff, oddly proportioned and moves with no grace at all. It takes effort to ruin a design as great as Batman's. He takes a design that thrives in it's simplicity and adds a load of lines to it. Awful. But at least the silhouette is intact, even if Nolan makes very little use of it.
But let's move on to the main discussion here. Bane. Let me tell you what's wrong with Bane.
He's too short. And this isn't just because he is shorter than he is in the comics (although it highlights how big of a mistake this is), it's the fact that he isn't big enough, muscularly, to pull off his stature.
If Bane is such a 'movie monster' then it makes sense for him to be taller than just about everybody else. And he doesn't need to be that tall. 6'2" to 6'4" is tall enough. He just needs to be taller than Batman. Being (nearly) as tall as Batman isn't good enough. If he's being presented as this dominating, monstrous presence, then it is essential that there is nothing that Batman has the advantage over him physically.
"But JAK!", I hear you cry, "Small people beat up bigger people all the time! Are you saying Bruce Lee isn't tough?" Yes, that is true, but that is not Bane, and it's not even what Nolan's Bane is about. When smaller characters beat up larger ones, it is almost always demonstrated on film as an ironic situation. The guy is little but he makes up for it with skill. But it's meant to be a surprise because they don't look intimidating. Nolan's Bane looks intimidating already, so obviously Nolan isn't going for that. It also doesn't work because the little guy is a hero, an underdog, and that's what Batman is supposed to be in this film.
"So what do you want?", you retort, "A 7-foot-tall steroid-abusing wrestler with no acting skill in the role? Hardy is a good actor and that's all that matters." First of all, hyperbole is the worst thing in the universe, and secondly I don't have a problem with Hardy, despite his average 5'9" stature. Height is the easiest thing to change on film. Tom Cruise does it in every film he's in. Hardy is perfectly cast when taking that into account. He's tough-looking and acts intimidating in the way Bane should act. Hardy is what is going to make the role work.
Which is why it's such a shame that Hardy is being held back by poor presentation. We have numerous shots in each trailer where he looks small. It puts more pressure on him to deliver. He isn't even as muscular as he should be. His arms are exposed and Nolan hasn't even made him pump up before filming. (If you don't know what that means, it's a common technique where actors do a few heavy curls just because they begin a scene so that the blood rushes to their arms and makes them look bigger. This is called the 'pump'.)
Hardy is an odd shape because his arms lag behind his wide back, shoulders and massive traps anyway. And Nolan's design has hidden all his good qualities that make him look intimidating despite them. See Bronson and Warrior, Hardy is often bare-chested and shows how wide he really is. But in TDKR that's hidden and his weakest attribute is put on display, with no effort made to make up for it. Clueless.
I know what you're all going to say. That it's Hardy's performance that will pull it off, and I absolutely agree. But he has to work harder than he should. He's going to have to fight against the fact that he is shorter and smaller than he is being presented. And it all could have easily been avoided if Nolan had any idea on how to present a character.
There. Now you can begin disagreeing with me.