S
scuba6580
Guest
However, you present an interesting idea. I never really thought of it that way. See below...
And what is the ramifications from this? Becasue Jor-El says it's wrong, it's wrong? I always took it as at that point he chose humanity, using his powers to save someone he loved, as opposed to falling in line with Jor-El's controls on him. Hence he 'hears' both his fathers in his head "you are forbidden to interfere with human history" and "you have these powers for a reason."
It's not simply so he can sleep with Lois, he is choosing a regular human life w/o powers instead of being Superman. And while he has to eventually go back to being Superman, he had no idea that Zod and co. would show up. At that point he realized that the world needs a Superman for those jobs that are only doable by Superman.
FOr me, SUperman RETurns is different from the above becasue common sense tells you that this is a bad idea to leave w/o saying goodbeye. WIthin the conext of the other films, theres nothing to make Superman believe that anything so bad will occur for his choice to save Lois or become human. It is interesting to consider this especially when you use the Donner cut of II and imagine just a regualr saving of Lois at the end of S:TM and view both as a single story which was how they were originally conceived.
It makes sense then that as his first adventure he would go through all these emotions and conflict to finally arrive at the realization that the world needs him and he can't put one human above the rest.
Superman I: The ramifications are, yeah, he saves Lois' life, but what Jor-El was so concerned about was that his son would be setting a bad precedent. How many times is too much for spinning the world back to alter history? Should Superman do it for eveyone who dies tragically and "unfairly," or just for who's important to him?
Superman II: The Superman films take place in a reality where Superman is already a busy guy. He knows that by doing what he's doing with giving up his powers that he will be missed. Yes, Superman has a right to want a human aspect to his life (being with Lois), but in doing so he unwittingly allows the 3 Phantom Zone Criminals to run amok throughout the country, killing who-knows-how-many people in the progress before he can arrive to stop them. Again, mom and pop were right.
Superman Returns: He bails without saying good-bye because, well...outta sight, outta mind, apparently.
Correct or not, these are the three axes that the 3 movies spin on, and they all revolve around Superman's inability to think beyond immediate results, and what the ramifications of him using his power unwisely are. I'd say that's a pretty responsible theme for a bunch of movies about a guy who can do anything.