Bruce Malone
Superhero
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Messages
- 8,216
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 33
I think it was fine there was no joker mention for a number of reasons. No offense but an after credit scene like that would have been very cheesy and taken away from the impact of the last scene.
The John Blake conclusion was there for the audience to leave to their own interpretation about what happens next. Ending with the joker breaking out is essentially the set up for a direct sequel that will not happen. If anything it's a huge tease to the audience. It's pretty much the ending to begins taken to the next level.
The only thing people leaving the theatre would be talking about would be the joker which is the last thing nolan wanted.
The John Blake conclusion was there for the audience to leave to their own interpretation about what happens next. Ending with the joker breaking out is essentially the set up for a direct sequel that will not happen. If anything it's a huge tease to the audience. It's pretty much the ending to begins taken to the next level.
The only thing people leaving the theatre would be talking about would be the joker which is the last thing nolan wanted.