freshandclean
Civilian
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 409
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Whedon's a risky choice, IMO. There has to be some seriousness/human drama in the X-Films to keep it consistent with the past films. And I think Whedon has it in him (seeing his past television work). However, he's also the king of *quip* *quip* *punch* *quip* *quip* *punch*, which works (sorta, though AoU took it way too far) for The Avengers and other MCU properties. But I really don't want that infecting the X-Films.
Another worry I would have is that Whedon tends to give all the characters the same voice and sense of humor (which is basically Whedon's sense of humor). The great thing about Singer is his X-Men (at least the ones he chooses to develop) have their own individual voices.
I guess I don't trust Whedon to take an already established X-Verse and try to conform a little to it. And as a director he shouldn't have to, so it's not a knock on him. But Vaughn, for example, blended pretty seamlessly and I think it's because Vaughn and Singer work well together. Whedon, from what I hear, especially after working with Disney, may not be open to having someone "above" him, so to speak.
Another worry I would have is that Whedon tends to give all the characters the same voice and sense of humor (which is basically Whedon's sense of humor). The great thing about Singer is his X-Men (at least the ones he chooses to develop) have their own individual voices.
I guess I don't trust Whedon to take an already established X-Verse and try to conform a little to it. And as a director he shouldn't have to, so it's not a knock on him. But Vaughn, for example, blended pretty seamlessly and I think it's because Vaughn and Singer work well together. Whedon, from what I hear, especially after working with Disney, may not be open to having someone "above" him, so to speak.