echostation
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2000
- Messages
- 5,093
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Why does it have to be all caps with no new information...go wb!!!!
The new information finally confirms Zod, no doubt we'll be getting a reveal shortly.
Also on the TV spot it was just like having the trailer on fast forward except the part where he said "where do I come from?" The footage lingered slightly longer on Cavill.
I think now they've released these tidbits its gonna start now.
The most frequent question I heard from those of you who stopped me at WonderCon or who sent me e-mails in the days after the event was "Why didn't Warner Bros. show new 'Man Of Steel' footage during the panel?"
Obviously, Warner Bros. marketing doesn't run their decision-making by me for approval, so I can't answer that question conclusively. I can, however, guess based on the reactions I've heard from people who have seen Zack Snyder's Superman movie, and it seems to me that Warner Bros. didn't bring new footage to screen because, frankly, they don't have to.
The most dangerous thing to do with a giant blockbuster in today's media landscape is to jam it down the throat of the audience to the point where they learn to hate the film before they ever lay eyes on it. Sometimes, it's the only option that the studio has, and when they know a movie doesn't work, that's when they kick into overdrive. When a movie has a pre-release awareness as automatic as a new Superman movie and they feel like the film completely works, that's when they get to lay back a bit and let the actual anticipation of the audience do the work for them.
.......
........
By centering the campaign on an idea instead of a villain, it makes this feel different than most superhero films already. And by emphasizing character over action (and word is there is plenty of action, some of it truly epic), it makes this feel like a real film and not just another empty CGI spectacle.
So the reason I think Warner brought "The Conjuring" and "Pacific Rim" to the WonderCon was because they believe in those films and they know that those are originals, movies that don't come with the automatic cultural weight of a Superman movie, and that they could generate conversation with a great presentation. As a quick look around the Internet right now will prove, even a "Man Of Steel" trailer that features nothing new is enough to cause excited posts everywhere. People are ready to see what Snyder and Nolan have done, and they're excited to see what Henry Cavill does as the character. At this point, if they didn't show us anything new between now and release, I still think they'd have theaters packed on opening day.
Written FAR better by Drew McWeeney at Hitfix here:-
The most frequent question I heard from those of you who stopped me at WonderCon or who sent me e-mails in the days after the event was "Why didn't Warner Bros. show new 'Man Of Steel' footage during the panel?"
Obviously, Warner Bros. marketing doesn't run their decision-making by me for approval, so I can't answer that question conclusively. I can, however, guess based on the reactions I've heard from people who have seen Zack Snyder's Superman movie, and it seems to me that Warner Bros. didn't bring new footage to screen because, frankly, they don't have to.
The most dangerous thing to do with a giant blockbuster in today's media landscape is to jam it down the throat of the audience to the point where they learn to hate the film before they ever lay eyes on it. Sometimes, it's the only option that the studio has, and when they know a movie doesn't work, that's when they kick into overdrive. When a movie has a pre-release awareness as automatic as a new Superman movie and they feel like the film completely works, that's when they get to lay back a bit and let the actual anticipation of the audience do the work for them.
.......
........
By centering the campaign on an idea instead of a villain, it makes this feel different than most superhero films already. And by emphasizing character over action (and word is there is plenty of action, some of it truly epic), it makes this feel like a real film and not just another empty CGI spectacle.
So the reason I think Warner brought "The Conjuring" and "Pacific Rim" to the WonderCon was because they believe in those films and they know that those are originals, movies that don't come with the automatic cultural weight of a Superman movie, and that they could generate conversation with a great presentation. As a quick look around the Internet right now will prove, even a "Man Of Steel" trailer that features nothing new is enough to cause excited posts everywhere. People are ready to see what Snyder and Nolan have done, and they're excited to see what Henry Cavill does as the character. At this point, if they didn't show us anything new between now and release, I still think they'd have theaters packed on opening day.
The new information finally confirms Zod, no doubt we'll be getting a reveal shortly.
Also on the TV spot it was just like having the trailer on fast forward except the part where he said "where do I come from?" The footage lingered slightly longer on Cavill.
I think now they've released these tidbits its gonna start now.
t:
t:
t:less worried not that one would be worried to begin withAnyone else more or less worried about Cavill's performance now? That shot had me a little worried, but then again I feel that way about a lot of scenes of actors when they're included in trailers, then they end up making sense and flowing perfectly in the film. I really hope he does at least as well as Routh did.

Anyone else more or less worried about Cavill's performance now? That shot had me a little worried
it is the same clip from the second trailer with just 2 seconds longer shot of his head tiltinggood lordit is the same clip from the second trailer with just 2 seconds longer shot his head tiltting
yet yoiu did'nt say anything before??
right back at ya bud! I was just about to post about that actually. I cringed when I saw how he delivered that line. Hopefully that is the one of the very times I will cringe at his performance...![]()
And on the flip side of that I remember seeing the trailers for Oz the Great and Powerful and thinking "boy, James Franco looks like he actually may be enjoyable in this and like he gives a good performance!" (and I like Franco in general, I liked him in Pineapple Express and Freaks and Geeks), then I watched the first clip online and saw the movie itself and not only was it terrible but he was hard to watch as well, in my opinion (but did GA care? Nope).good lord![]()
lolIt's not the same. We see him deliver a full line and I think the delivery was bad, his facial expressions were over the top and looked like someone trying to act instead of acting. That is my opinion. Not an opinion on his performance as a whole (I am one of the biggest Cavill supporters here or anywhere actually) but just on this line. Which I believe I am entitled to form because again, we see him deliver a full line.
Anyone else more or less worried about Cavill's performance now? That shot had me a little worried, but then again I feel that way about a lot of scenes of actors when they're included in trailers, then they end up making sense and flowing perfectly in the film. I really hope he does at least as well as Routh did.
It's not the same. We see him deliver a full line and I think the delivery was bad, his facial expressions were over the top and looked like someone trying to act instead of acting. That is my opinion. Not an opinion on his performance as a whole (I am one of the biggest Cavill supporters here or anywhere actually) but just on this line. Which I believe I am entitled to form because again, we see him deliver a full line.