All Things Superman: An Open Discussion - Part 38

[Kevin Smith]

Meh I just went back to the source of description (imdb) to scoop around and the person who provided it seems to be the biggest troll there hating heavily on MOS claiming the description is from someone who deleted it and their account afterwards?? LOL! Fake. Totally fake. Please EW uncover the new cover already and let it be MOS so that this fake trailer talk dies down!

Didn't they say that's what happened though, initially? That the original description was from someone who deleted their account right after to hide their "identity"?

 

[G.Godfrey]

Didn't they say that's what happened though, initially? That the original description was from someone who deleted their account right after to hide their "identity"?

I don't know who they is because apparently only one or two people saw it. Anyway I'm really not in the mood to explain in detail but im sure if you go and do a bit of digging yourself you'll see what im talking about. I know you want it to be true because you like what it said and in this drought period we are liable to be far more gullible than otherwise. But again when trolls are at it....

Don't worry though, I'm sure the actual trailer is even better.

 

[BH/HHH]

I want the new trailerrrrrrrr nooowwwwwww!!!!!

KHANNNNNNNN!!!!

 

[Isearch4dope]

^^ too far dude.

Yea it was but maybe....just maybe they give us a quick glance of shock and they realize what they're doing to us.

 

[flickchick85]

I want the new trailerrrrrrrr nooowwwwwww!!!!!

KHANNNNNNNN!!!!

LOL, if I were a troll, Khan would totally be my username just to see how many of these reactions I could elicit.

 

[Dark Sentinel]

I want the new trailerrrrrrrr nooowwwwwww!!!!!

KHANNNNNNNN!!!!

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

IMDB is a hell hole.

 

[Kevin Smith]

I don't know who they is because apparently only one or two people saw it. Anyway I'm really not in the mood to explain in detail but im sure if you go and do a bit of digging yourself you'll see what im talking about. I know you want it to be true because you like what it said and in this drought period we are liable to be far more gullible than otherwise. But again when trolls are at it....

Don't worry though, I'm sure the actual trailer is even better.

Ahh, alright, thanks man.

And that'd be amazing if true!

 

[hopefuldreamer]

Me in this thread for all of today:

 

[i_Cam]

Spoiler

Me in this thread for all of today:

me too

*re reads trailer description*

 

[G.Godfrey]

I have a VERY good FEELING about the next 4-6 hours.

 

[Kevin Smith]

I have a VERY good FEELING about the next 4-6 hours.

don't even...

 

[BH/HHH]

he he

I've never been a Trekkie but seriously how FN good is Wrath of Khan?!

 

[Rowsdower!]

I have a VERY good FEELING about the next 4-6 hours.

For the trailer? Or just some photos?

 

[G.Godfrey]

For the trailer?

Jeez man you go straight for the home run don't you? t: Hell no not for the trailer!

Now I am not going to make any promises but again, I DO, genuinely have a VERY GOOD FEELING about the next few hours.

 

[Rowsdower!]

Jeez man you go straight for the home run don't you? t: Hell no not for the trailer!

Now I am not going to make any promises but again, I DO, genuinely have a VERY GOOD FEELING about the next few hours.

Ah, okay. Well, I hope you're right, regardless. I just need something NEW from this movie, other than a slightly longer shot of Cavill asking where he comes from.

 

[G.Godfrey]

Anyway, in other news in an article about Star Trek's international marketing or something The Hollywood Reporter also wrote this:

The studio is borrowing a page from Warner Bros., which overcame similar challenges with Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy (the Caped Crusader wasn't historically a great traveler) by crafting a huge overseas campaign. "We were able to turn the property into an event instead of a superhero movie," says WB's international distribution chief Veronika Kwan Vandenberg. The studio made its biggest push with 2012's The Dark Knight Rises, which became the first Batman movie to earn more overseas than domestically ($632.9 million vs. $448.1 million). Warners plans to repeat the strategy with June's Man of Steel, which features a British star (Henry Cavill) and the globally known Superman brand.

And yesterday I read an article on the Business Insider slamming MOS's TV spot and questioning the marketing so far but I choose not to post it in here as to not bring more negativity and bad blood. Nice, right? t:

 

[i_Cam]

I have a VERY good FEELING about the next 4-6 hours.

 

[Denish]

MTV just released a teaser of a preview of IronMan 3 that will air Sunday during the Awards..The Lone Ranger released a couple of posters in 2 days..Wolverine behind the scenes pics..TAS2 same thing..IronMan 3...I've lost count of the things released for that movie..

Albertafilm ratings just updated the page listing yesterday's Elysium trailer and R.I.P.D...no sign of MoS...

 

[G.Godfrey]

a teaser of a preview of IronMan 3

Zod make it stop!

 

[Denish]

Zod make it stop!

Yeah..for a movie that in my opinion needs no marketing..or at least, not this Huge exposure..It could easily earn a billion dollars with only two trailers and some magazine features..

 

[Tacit Ronin]

WB doesn't want to get filth on its boots by presenting Man of Steel on MTV's poopy platform.

 

[Denish]

WB doesn't want at all to show that has a movie coming out t:

 

[Tacit Ronin]

Yeah..for a movie that in my opinion needs no marketing..or at least, not this Huge exposure..It could easily earn a billion dollars with only two trailers and some magazine features..

You would be right at home in a seat with the WB marketing team.

 

[Norek]

WB doesn't want to get filth on its boots by presenting Man of Steel on MTV's poopy platform.

Yeah, that's why only ****** movies like TDKR get presented on the poopy platform.