Rowsdower!
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 27,929
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 31
![]()
we could have gotten a better logo than this.
This is terrible.
I don't think it's terrible but why did they cut out part of the 75 like that? It looks weird.
![]()
we could have gotten a better logo than this.
This is terrible.
@FicoCangiano 2h
A friend's reaction to a certain movie coming out in a couple of weeks: "I was expecting a 9, but it was seriously a 10."
‏@juanmadpelicula 2h
I would say 11, but thats just me. LOL
@Juanmadpelicula is the guy who saw the movie yesterday
I'm just brainstorming something that could appease everyone on here for their Superman-punching/action fix, as well as something that keeps with the grounded aesthetic laid down by Snyder.
Just to be clear I'm not saying humanoid size robots like what we might be getting in MOS, or like I,Robot.
I'm talking something like this (it doesn't even need to be a robot, it could be manned):
![]()
It's even glowing green cause it has a Kryptonite fuel cell.
They overlapped the two numbers. The 'cut out' is that overlap.I don't think it's terrible but why did they cut out part of the 75 like that? It looks weird.
That's cool. I get it. I'm not in love with the idea either, but that's only cause I'm the loser who's fine with seeing Superman just avert natural disasters and terrorist (Luthor) plots. As long as it's with Henry and Amy and whoever big-name they get for Luthor I'm there.I fully understood your piont.But we are already getting a giant Robot Monster in MOS-Black zero and a bunch of flying humanoid Robots and loads of hitech armor and tech-piont is lots of machine threats and that why
I thought it wld be best to go mostly organic for the sequel.
Im not jumping on the Robot idea for the same reason you dont want an Alien invasionon in part 2.
That's cool. I get it. I'm not in love with the idea either, but that's only cause I'm the loser who's fine with seeing Superman just avert natural disasters and terrorist (Luthor) plots. As long as it's with Henry and Amy and whoever big-name they get for Luthor I'm there.
That's the thing, people here cite SR as this total failure because there was no punching, but it was really just because Brandon and Kate were unlikable characters, and Spacey was hindered by doing a throwback to campy Lex.

That's cool. I get it. I'm not in love with the idea either, but that's only cause I'm the loser who's fine with seeing Superman just avert natural disasters and terrorist (Luthor) plots. As long as it's with Henry and Amy and whoever big-name they get for Luthor I'm there.
That's the thing, people here cite SR as this total failure because there was no punching, but it was really just because Brandon and Kate were unlikable characters, and Spacey was hindered by doing a throwback to campy Lex.

And this ladies and gentlemen is why we have the BEST superman that we could have possibily gotten..
Cavill articulates that responsibility best: When it comes to seeing a kid who actually believes you're Superman he doesnt see Henry Cavill, the actor playing Superman, its, 'Daddy, its Superman,' and hes hiding his face. Hes scared and then he wants to..." Cavill trails off, regrouping. "Little babies reaching out for you. That is nuts because the responsibility attached to that. Theyre going to have that experience for the rest of their life -- when they met Superman, not when they met Henry Cavill who is an actor playing Superman. I think thats really important for such an incredible icon, to do that just right. If you mess that up, youre the wrong guy for the role.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/30/discovering-smallville-usa-on-the-set-of-man-of-steel?page=3
These guys have seen the movie. Spoiler alert-it sticks faithfully to the common cannon.
Also, Shannon says that "Henry was BORN to play Superman." Which is as close to an honest endorsement as we're every gonna get pre-embargo.
How do you know they are telling the truth?These guys have seen the movie. Spoiler alert-it sticks faithfully to the common cannon.
Also, Shannon says that "Henry was BORN to play Superman." Which is as close to an honest endorsement as we're every gonna get pre-embargo.
And this ladies and gentlemen is why we have the BEST superman that we could have possibily gotten..
Cavill articulates that responsibility best: When it comes to seeing a kid who actually believes you're Superman he doesnt see Henry Cavill, the actor playing Superman, its, 'Daddy, its Superman,' and hes hiding his face. Hes scared and then he wants to..." Cavill trails off, regrouping. "Little babies reaching out for you. That is nuts because the responsibility attached to that. Theyre going to have that experience for the rest of their life -- when they met Superman, not when they met Henry Cavill who is an actor playing Superman. I think thats really important for such an incredible icon, to do that just right. If you mess that up, youre the wrong guy for the role.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/30/discovering-smallville-usa-on-the-set-of-man-of-steel?page=3

@Rowsdower It's where the 7 and the 5 overlap, but I agree it doesn't look right.
About the embargo, we have members here that will be seeing it on the 5th, so we won't have to wait nearly as long to get proper reactions

These guys have seen the movie. Spoiler alert-it sticks faithfully to the common cannon.
Thanks for the tip.Wow... Read a spoiler from that first link that I wish I wouldn't have read... Do not look at it unless you want a major spoiler...
You have nobody to blame but yourself. It even says "highlight for specific spoilers". Exactly what did you think that meant? You people kill me. You scream that you don't want to be spoiled and yet go out of your way to highlight spoiler material.Wow... Read a spoiler from that first link that I wish I wouldn't have read... Do not look at it unless you want a major spoiler...
