Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]482877[/split]
Max Landis' 42 minute Death and Return of Superman pitch would be PERFECT for this movie
Honestly I thought it was ridiculous. He wrote another youtube post complaining about too much violence in MoS, then he pitches a movie with endless action scenes and a massively convoluted plot to boot.
Honestly I thought it was ridiculous. He wrote another youtube post complaining about too much violence in MoS, then he pitches a movie with endless action scenes and a massively convoluted plot to boot.
Sorry... Landis is an off putting *****e bag. There's lots of stuff that he's right to poke fun at in the 90's Death of Superman story but his central idea... Totally wrong. If the Death and Return of Superman were actually the first death and resurrection in comic books, he'd at least have a leg to stand on. But he seems to have completely ignored the actual 30 years of comic book history before 1992 all for the purpose of appearing like a hipster pop culture sage. The tumbler of scotch he's drinking has got to be one of the most pretentious "props" I've ever seen in a youtube vid.
not the Max Landis Death of Superman film.Sorry... Landis is an off putting *****e bag. There's lots of stuff that he's right to poke fun at in the 90's Death of Superman story but his central idea... Totally wrong. If the Death and Return of Superman were actually the first death and resurrection in comic books, he'd at least have a leg to stand on. But he seems to have completely ignored the actual 30 years of comic book history before 1992 all for the purpose of appearing like a hipster pop culture sage. The tumbler of scotch he's drinking has got to be one of the most pretentious "props" I've ever seen in a youtube vid.
not the Max Landis Death of Superman film.
The 42 minute Death of Superman movie pitch is different
I see a lot of people with that opinion online. I don't see what's so *****ey or off putting about him. He talks fast and has a lot to say...maybe I'm just missing what's so offensive about him.
If you don't believe in yourself first, nobody will.
But at the same time, I'm of the belief that you can will things into existence with confidence, positive energy, and the work ethic to back it up.
That's why a lot of pioneers and trailblazers throughout history were laughing stocks at first. Hindsight is 20/20 after they deliver, but it takes strength of character to believe in your vision when nobody else does.
But at the same time, I'm of the belief that you can will things into existence with confidence, positive energy, and the work ethic to back it up.
That's why a lot of pioneers and trailblazers throughout history were laughing stocks at first. Hindsight is 20/20 after they deliver, but it takes strength of character to believe in your vision when nobody else does.
.....You always gotta balance that out though or else it's easy to find yourself in a heap of trouble. I mean, as Clint says...
[YT]_VrFV5r8cs0[/YT]
Or to put it in Zen terms... It is only by understanding and accepting our limitations that we can ever truly become unlimited. (Sound of gong being hit)![]()
.....
Sounds like something Michaelangelo from the new show would say