Reeve, not Reeves, people.![]()
will we see the Fortress of Solitude in the Arctic........MOS did not really feature that
When I first seen District 9 I didn't know that all of the aliens were actually CGI. So as long as I don't notice that it is CGI until I watch the behind the scenes stuff then I'm okay with it.
![]()
![]()
district 9 is such a good movie. too bad, it didn't do good and can't have the sequel.![]()
Naked Bat said:I hate district 9, because it made me have high hopes for Elysium.
I'm pretty sure it did wellIt made like three times it's budget.
![]()
I'm pretty sure it did wellIt made like three times it's budget.
![]()
I really want to make a District 9 sequel. I genuinely do. The problem is I have a bunch of ideas and stuff that I want to make. I'm relatively new to this – I'm about to make my third film, and now the pattern that I'm starting to realise is very true is that you lock yourself into a film beyond the film you're currently working on. But it just doesn't work for me
then, where is the sequel!!!???
it did poorly.
As of November 4, 2009, District 9 had grossed an estimated $210,819,205, of which $115,646,235 was from Canada and the United States making it a huge box office success, with a revenue seven times its original production budget of only $30 million.
EDIT: Bah, tacit!In an interview with IGN in June 2013, Blomkamp said, "I really want to make a District 9 sequel. I genuinely do. The problem is I have a bunch of ideas and stuff that I want to make. I'm relatively new to this I'm about to make my third film, and now the pattern that I'm starting to realise is very true is that you lock yourself into a film beyond the film you're currently working on. But it just doesn't work for me." Blomkamp also revealed that it is to be called District 10.
Same here, CGI that I can't detect is amazing.
I agree but when you can tell its fake it can detract from the enjoyment of the movie. But when its seamless, that's when its magic.
It's always easier to detect when it's used to render humans because, obviously, we see human details pretty much every second of our lives.
But when it comes to things like Zod's armour, Davy Jones, Smaug and the like, we're not trained to see those differences.
Even in Man of Steel, when Superman's face is CGI, and not moving in a blur (there's a sequence in thr Metropolis fight), it's easy to distinguish as CGI.
It's always easier to detect when it's used to render humans because, obviously, we see human details pretty much every second of our lives.
But when it comes to things like Zod's armour, Davy Jones, Smaug and the like, we're not trained to see those differences.
Even in Man of Steel, when Superman's face is CGI, and not moving in a blur (there's a sequence in thr Metropolis fight), it's easy to distinguish as CGI.
It's always easier to detect when it's used to render humans because, obviously, we see human details pretty much every second of our lives.
But when it comes to things like Zod's armour, Davy Jones, Smaug and the like, we're not trained to see those differences.
Even in Man of Steel, when Superman's face is CGI, and not moving in a blur (there's a sequence in thr Metropolis fight), it's easy to distinguish as CGI.
That's true. I was surprised at poor some of the effects were in MOS. Prior to the movie I thought the flying sequences in particular would be incredibly well done but they came across as decidedly fake in many instances. Even in the previous Superman Returns there were only a few flying sequences which I thought were great - one of the best being when Routh as Superman flies across a street in Metropolis and you see people looking up towards the sky. There's another sequence which was also well done - when he's flying towards the mess Luthor created and you see him flying across the ocean and he stops mid-flight.
Many people (most of the world's population, in fact) think that this is a natural direction for the story to take.
They could ask Superman to leave Earth. (Not that he will agree.)