Actually, no it hasn't. Stop thinking your opinion as a fact.
When I said that this show has "respected the source" during the show, not all of the time of course and I never claimed that it always did, but it has done, well, that is a fact. Green Arrow has much less to work with than Flash does though, in terms of villains, stories etc that are good or that people actually like, so yeah, there is always that. It probably makes it more simple to understand why they are less accurate than the Flash is. They have less to work with and want to be successful, which they have been.
You don't see them killing off Barry Allen, do you? DC Policies may be ridiculous, but it's not ridiculous to the extent, for instance lets say, there's a batman show, and they restricted nightwing.
Barry Allen is the main character in his show, and as a result, the most important part a show that DC makes money from. Laurel's role on this show is much, much smaller. Given the other characters that had to be killed, or that were restricted, it would not be a surprise at all of she were to be because of a movie. Characters like Ra's al Ghul and Scarecrow were not allowed to be used in the show The Batman. If there are characters that are going to play a big part in a movie, they will restrict them. That is a fact. If they planned to use Nightwing in a movie, they probably would restrict him in a Batman show. If I am wrong about it being DC's decision (if she is killed that is), I will gladly admit it. I will be interested to know if you will.
And, I was exaggerating the fact, it not being a comic book show anymore..
I am glad that you admit it. It is common on the internet, unfortunately, and it doesn't help discussions at all.
You're free to believe what you wish, but the evidence is right there on twitter or on youtube...
Oh, I see. I forgot that Twitter and Youtube were the sources of intelligence and objectivity, and not knee-jerk emotional reactions. I should definitely go there when I need answers

. Also, wasn't social media one of the things that you were complaining about earlier?
Oh boy, if you can't handle people 'moaning' about the show, why even come here? People are free criticize what they want, and 'moan' all they want. I find it funny, that's its bothering you that much....
I can handle people moaning. Sure don't I love to have a bit of a moan about stuff from time to time myself. It doesn't mean that when you moan that you will not be called out on it, when some of the criticisms seem to be over the top or to be exaggerated.
So tell me good sir, why would i drop the show, when i enjoyed the first 3 seasons, and not the current one? The only reason I'm sticking around is hoping for the show to get better, and get back to Season 2 Quality....
Well, since you asked and were also kind enough to call me "good sir", personally, I believe that seeing as you think so little of the show and see absolutely nothing good about it (which is how it seems to me, going by your posts, as there are only criticisms there and no mentions of anything that you seem to like or enjoy), it would probably be for the best if you dropped the show. It seems to make you angry too, resulting in you using words like "******" to describe "Olicity" fans, which is pretty sad and pathetic on your part, if you don't mind me saying.
TV shows are supposed to be about enjoyment, especially silly ones about superheroes like this one, and if you are not enjoying any bit of it ,and are getting so angry from watching it that it results in you calling a section of the shows fans "******s", then it is probably for the best.
If i don't like the direction of the show going in the next few episodes till end of season, It's simple, I'll drop it....
I always find it funny and silly when people feel the need to broadcast that they will stop watching a show. I stopped watching Gotham ages ago, but I didn't feel the need to make a big song and dance about it. When I stop watching, I simply do it and move on.