Community Feedback

Status
Not open for further replies.
Technically it is against Hype rules and we do our best to keep it in check, why can't you just type ****ing? It is more work to bypass?
 
Technically it is against Hype rules and we do our best to keep it in check, why can't you just type ****ing? It is more work to bypass?
I didn't bypass...it let me type that and didn't change anything for me so I thought it would be fine. I just think that if it was bad enough to spank me then it should be changed or deleted. ****ing could be a lot of things.:o

Don't side with the Fox lovers Showtime:cmad:
 
Showtime is Tom Rothman's back-hair groomer, Chase. Didn't you know that?

jag
 
I didn't bypass...it let me type that and didn't change anything for me so I thought it would be fine. I just think that if it was bad enough to spank me then it should be changed or deleted. ****ing could be a lot of things.:o

Don't side with the Fox lovers Showtime:cmad:

Showtime is Tom Rothman's back-hair groomer, Chase. Didn't you know that?

jag

What is funny about this, is I have been accused many a time on these boards of working for WB and being 100% against anything FOX does.

I can't win.
 
Showtime is Tom Rothman's back-hair groomer, Chase. Didn't you know that?

jag
I bet Showtime twirls the back hair with his finger in little circles while Rothman talks about ways to ruin more movie:o If Rothman, Lucas, and Uwe Boll teamed up...the world would end.
 
What is funny about this, is I have been accused many a time on these boards of working for WB and being 100% against anything FOX does.

I can't win.
Well at least WB is an alright studio:o
 
I'm going to give you both Tom Welling infractions.
 
Why don't the just censor the ways that are typically used to bypass the censors?:huh:
 
Seriously. If it's something you don't want people doing why don't you, you know, stop them from doing it?:huh:
 
You know what'd be sweet? A mini 18+ board section.

You guys could turn off the censors in those threads and allow discussion of more adult themed things. People could talk of alcohol,sexuality and relationships, etc, and just be more "adult".


Though being an adult is no excuse for being filthy or over the top. That section would still have to be clean, in the sense of being mature and reasonable....People couldn't end every sentence with uc between an F and a k.
 
Seriously. If it's something you don't want people doing why don't you, you know, stop them from doing it?:huh:
Good question...but I still didn't bypass the censor...it let me type that. If I type out the entire word...it will censor it. It won't censor the way I typed it so technically I did nothing wrong:o
 
You know what'd be sweet? A mini 18+ board section.

You guys could turn off the censors in those threads and allow discussion of more adult themed things. People could talk of alcohol,sexuality and relationships, etc, and just be more "adult".


Though being an adult is no excuse for being filthy or over the top. That section would still have to be clean, in the sense of being mature and reasonable....People couldn't end every sentence with uc between an F and a k.

Never happen here
 
Seriously. If it's something you don't want people doing why don't you, you know, stop them from doing it?:huh:

I didn't realize it was that difficult not to do something. ****ing is censored, I'm not sure what Chaester is talking about.
 
Good question...but I still didn't bypass the censor...it let me type that. If I type out the entire word...it will censor it. It won't censor the way I typed it so technically I did nothing wrong:o

Technicalities are like arguing semantics. The whole point is to not curse, dodging the censor in any kind of way is still in effect cursing.


It's like Casino's that think "13" is bad luck so they call the 13th floor "14". It's stupid because it's still the 13th floor.
 
The system doesn't let you post ****ing, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. :huh:
I got in trouble for typing this exactly and it said by bypassing the censor: "fu**ing". I didn't bypass the censor. Bypassing the censor would be me going and changing what the censor censored or being creative and using numbers or something. If it lets me type fu** then I see no problem with it:huh:
 
Technicalities are like arguing semantics. The whole point is to not curse, dodging the censor in any kind of way is still in effect cursing.


It's like Casino's that think "13" is bad luck so they call the 13th floor "14". It's stupid because it's still the 13th floor.
As Brodie said, why are we allowed to dodge the censor if dodging the censor is bad:huh:
 
I didn't realize it was that difficult not to do something. ****ing is censored, I'm not sure what Chaester is talking about.


Well, it's not that difficult to not say mother****er, but you still took the trouble to censor it.
 
I got in trouble for typing this exactly and it said by bypassing the censor: "fu**ing". I didn't bypass the censor. Bypassing the censor would be me going and changing what the censor censored or being creative and using numbers or something. If it lets me type fu** then I see no problem with it:huh:

Is there a reason you need to throw out challenges at every turn. You're a good poster, I like you but this conversation is melting my eyeballs.

You know how many infractions we have given out based on the argument you are trying to make, you are playing semantics. Bypassing the censor encompasses exactly what you did. The censor is responsible for stopping the use of swears. If you don't just type the swear straight out, than anything you are doing is bypassing the censor. You don't think what you did is bypassing the censor, the manner in which you typed it went around the censor...explain how that is not bypassing it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"