The Apocalypse
Superhero
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 8,859
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 58
my reasoning was wedding + Red Keep = Red Wedding![]()
I think that for the most part, when Whedon killed off a character, there was some grand sacrifice or gesture behind it.
Mind that I'm not complaining now, but with GoT, what makes deaths so hard to take is that for the most part, they are senseless. There is no grand sacrifice for Ned (only failure), there is no satisfying closure for Robb and Catelyn was literally brought to the point where she just checked out due to her thinking her entire family was gone (with her eldest being butchered in front of her being her last memory). She wanted death, she welcomed it in those final moments.
If nothing else it just increases your desire to see their betrayers and murderers get royally ****ed.
I thought the Rains of Castamera we're going to be related on Cersei killing off the Gay Tyrell kid, but since that's the predictable thing maybe that won't happen at all. :b Tho at the end Robb getting backstabbed and his errors being caught up to him are the logical and predictable thing if you do try your ebst to look at things in a neutral view.
The first two were idiotic, but I really can't hold the Karstark thing against him too much. That dumb old **** didn't deserve to live.
Losing the army, yeah that sucked, but **** that guy.
Yes, I said he would be both. My comment about not mentioning it was referring to the books, as the northerners never actually use the title. The Riverlands lord is always actively called Lord Paramount though.Bolton is still new the Lord Paramount of the North and Warden of the North. Just because the show may not explicitly state it doesn't mean it's not worth knowing. I think they might since Tyrion mentioned giving Harrenhal to Littlefinger and naming him Lord Paramount of the Riverlands.
It was very late when I posted that so I meant Lord Reaper of Pyke rather than "King of..." but no, the Greyjoys aren't Lord Paramounts. That was lost when they lost the Riverlands. They are still seen as a great house but there are more of those than there are Lord Paramounts. There's only six of the latter, which at the start of the story was Stark, Tully, Arryn, Lannister, Baratheon and Tyrell. As said, Greyjoy and Martell have other names for their rule. I don't know if anyone else acknowledge Greyjoy's title but Prince of Dorne is certainly official everywhere.I know not every house (eg Tully and Tyrell) were one of the ruling families of the Seven Kingdoms, but they became a great house around that time.
The Greyjoys are lord paramounts of the Iron Islands, when they are under the authority of the Iron Throne. King of Salt and Rock is just another of their titles when they are an independent kingdom like Iron King.
That's true that it's a difference but really I don't think it would have changed much. Balon would have reaped the North anyway and while Theon sacking Winterfell was bad for the Stark's image of power I don't think anything would have happened since at that time in Renly would already be in alliance with Robb if he had lived, even if things were done as in the story. The Boltons would not dare to move against Robb then as their motivation is to pick the winning side and get as much out of it as possible. And even if Renly didn't agree to an alliance he'd still take the Throne on his own and Tywin would likely retreat to Casterly Rock to not be stuck between two enemies (and perhaps forced to obey through all his children being hostages).The Greyjoys are lord paramounts of the Iron Islands, when they are under the authority of the Iron Throne. King of Salt and Rock is just another of their titles when they are an independent kingdom like Iron King.
I think it depends on how you see it. As said I don't think that any alliance would have been possible. Asking Stannis made no sense. He had no relevant forces to win anything with and no one likes him. Renly was always the only choice and he died. I don't see the Tyrell army marching up to Robb after that even if a deal had been made.It was a big one, but I still believe not declaring for Stannis or Renly and attempting an alliance with Balon Greyjoy were more significant. If Robb was winning the war (not just battles), they wouldn't have turned on him.
BOOK SPOILERS!!! You know the drill. DON'T READ, YADDA YADDA YADDA!!!
I really think they'll handle Shea a bit differently, on the show. I read the books after I had seen the first two seasons, so Shea's character in the series effected how I read her character in the books. So I read her "betrayal" as something Tywin forced her to do. I'm thinking she'll disappear, and take the place of Tyrion's wife in the books as the "****e" he's forever searching for.
As far as Jon goes, maybe I'm in denial, but I just don't believe he's dead. GRRM has pulled the death fake out too many times for me to buy into it. Anything short of decapitation isn't a sure thing, as far as I'm concerned. Hell, according to some theories, even that isn't completely reliable if Qyburn is involved.
It's not a spoiler, as the sigil is shown on the character/mentioned plenty of times, but if for some reason you're cautious, I put t in tags.
It is The Flayed Man, the sigil of House Bolton. Roose Bolton was a banner man of Robb Stark before betraying him. He was the one who gave Cat the smirk when she discovered his chain mail just before the start of the red wedding.
so who else noticed how when Roose stared at Catelyn he looked exactly like Tywin
After watching the preview for Mhysa, I'm guessing Joffrey and Margaery's wedding will be pushed through to next Season which makes sense. No reason for it to be next week. Anyway, plenty of things to come in Season 4. Also looking forward to the [blackout]Wildling siege on the Wall, and I guess Tyrion will turn on his father and Shae next Season as well.[/blackout] Most of all I'm looking forward to Victarion Greyjoy and to a lesser extent, Wyman Manderly (might be a Season 5 for him methinks). Perhaps Richard Griffiths could play Manderly.