and [Kevin Smith] was asked if he saw Han and Chewie.![]()
also he saw Han and Chewie on set.
lets just say he saw Han and Chewie on set.
Totally agree with you. I dont want ANH part 2, or ESB part 2, or ROTJ part 2. I want the SW feel but with new, compelling stories and characters. I have faith they wont fall into this trap, but i wont deny is one big fear i have in the back of my mind lol.I just hope the nostalgia factor doesn't take over the film. Yes, nostalgia will be a given since we're returning to this series with beloved characters who we haven't seen but I want a SW film that's fresh and exciting with its own new bold story to tell that has its own identity, while at the same time is absolutely SW.
People confuse what nostalgia actually is. The thing is it is a continuation. Some are going too far one way, and too far another. Some seem to just want it to be the old three, and no one else. Then there are others that want to take it into directions that are not Star Wars. Even though you say "it still needs to stay Star Wars" it's more of lets do all new things. You get crap like the Vong in the EU. To me some get paralyzed of use of things that connect to the past because they think it automatically means nostalgic methods, rather than a continuation/expansion of a story that is going forward. There are lines not meant to be crossed of course.
But with JJ I don't worry about this at all. I don't know why people think JJ will fall into that? Why? The only reason people say that is because of Super 8. A movie that he deliberately wanted to pay ode to Spielberg films of old. Other than that the man has never made a nostalgic piece of work pandering to just that. People try to say STID, but he's not a fan of ST and never was. So you can't be nostalgic for Khan if he never cared for him. (That was more of his writers).
JJ and Kinberg (who read the script as well) said that they are paying ode, but JJ has said many times he wants to do new things. Funny thing is Trek fans especially of ST09 gripe that he "changed it too much". So I kinda laugh when some say he's too "safe/nostalgic" then others that he goes too far in another direction. I find it odd though that when someone like Tarintino do films that are nothing but nostalgic films, he gets a nod for it. But that's for another time I guess.
But what you are asking is a contradiction. " I want something completely new and different but yet the same". It just really does not work like that. It will have to be a transition piece as well.
This is the last thing I worry about because JJ knows it needs to be new, but balanced with a continuation/passing of the torch. And the thing that worked with the OT was they were just better made films. Even they said about the production is that they are "creating" it in the method of the OT.
I've read the second draft of the Abrams/Kasdan script.
I've chosen a trip so that people can't BS in my name when trailers, other media, and the film itself confirm what I say. I won't post again until then so as not to be accused of attention ****ing.
Please don't read unless you want to have the film spoiled.
- Leia is made leader of the Republic after her predecessor’s death
- Han is a retired veteran of the Republic fleet
- Luke hasn’t been seen in nearly 30 years
- the lead character is Han and Leia’s daughter
- the other lead is the child of Lando, and either a male or female depending on who is cast
- the other lead is a Stormtrooper, also either a male or female depending on who is cast
- dialogue for these two characters is very rough in the second draft
- Luke has no known offspring
- The Empire still exists in the form of a number of loyal galaxies and are in a state of cold war with the Republic
- The Empire is simply referred to as the “Empire,” and the Republic is referred to formally only once, as the “Galactic Republic;” no “New” anywhere
- There are no Jedi whatsoever, and people still speak as if they are extinct, with Luke being “the last of his kind”
- The main antagonists are an older student of the Emperor, and his apprentice
- The apprentice takes control of the power dynamic between the two pretty quickly…
- The Republic are excavating ruins on a neutral world for a weapon; the world factors into tense negotiations the Empire have had with the Republic, and is referred to as the “Sith Homeworld”
- Loredump: In the script, the Sith are a couple thousand years old, founded by an ancestor of Palpatine called Ruin; the apprentice in this film also goes by that name
- the ruins within the Sith Homeworld are a control station; the planet itself is the weapon
- Luke saves the day at the end, but in a bad way; he has changed
Person #1 said:[People] should really spoiler tag [this]
Person #1 said:Some (not all) of this breakdown lines up with what I've heard. I think this is more like a game of telephone, and this information is third or fourth hand by this point, so there is a bit of signal-to-noise at work.
Person #2 said:Ha. Some of that is so close you wouldn't believe it. To whoever didn't believe the stormtrooper lead idea, you're incorrect.
Person #1 said:Exactly. It's surprisingly close on many points. Not all, though.
Person #2 said:One thing, though, is the assumption that Boyega is playing a Jedi. This has not been so much as hinted at, and it's been indicated to me that he isn't a Jedi at all, but in fact Lando's son. I imagine he'd make a great rogue, if Han's kids are Jedi and can't fulfil that role.
Person #2 said:Believe me, he's Lando's son.
Person #2 said:Boyega is playing Lando's son.
Ya Boyega pretty much outright denied it. But this is just the case of rumors. I remember Mace was rumored to be Lando's dad too lol. It may be the case, it may not. Right now we are in such uncharted unknown areas with so many unreliable sources it's just that...maybe stage.
He didn't deny he would be Lando's son. He just clarified he was talking about his real dad visiting the set.