• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Henry Cavill IS Superman: - - - - - Part 14

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm very curious to see Cavill as reporter Clark Kent in the sequel as he won't be the bumbling Clark of the past it should be interesting to see his take especially with Lois in on the secret and how she'll be able to cover for him when he disappears.
 
tumblr_m47bhxDlhW1qzaewxo1_500.jpg
- Define "bumbling reporter." ;)

I'm suspecting that Cavill will have him be a mostly normal person. As it should be, imho.
 
He'll be the George Reeves Clark Kent. :o
 
Just got back from the movie, Henry did a really great job in this role. He was quiet and stoic at the beginning but he became more social after he was told who he was and where he came from. One thing that really stood out for me was all the times he screamed in pain or to draw strength, it seemed very primal and more masculine. And yes I did catch the hair popping out of his suit.
 
So, yesterday someone mentioned that his wife thought that Henry looked attractive from far away, but ugly close-up. I became intrigued by this concept, given the fact that I consider him to be empirically attractive, so I decided to do an independent study on the subject, using an extremely unscientific single-subject design, in which I was the subject. I decided to view a series of pictures of Henry, and record my observations.

(I also decided to do this because Spidey requested pictures of Henry, and while these are old, they are....er....concentrated in one spot.)


Exhibit A:
312260_2050769268428_1220387537_31729702_1895821764_n.jpg


Ahh.....now, one can clearly see that the makers of Man of Steel were using that age old trick of encouraging the actor to jack up his body and grow a beard in order to cover up his homely features. Clearly, as stated by the previous poster, he is attractive from far away in this shot.

Let's move on to exhibit B, another faraway body shot, this time with the beard removed:

2Immortals-Stills-580x435.jpg


(Mouth drops open) Well, clearly the photo is too far away to really accurately critique Henry's facial features or bulging, sinewy body, so let's move in a little closer:


Immortals_17e-1280.jpg


Exhibit C: ....uh......well.....it's certainly possibly that the filmakers are now using dirt and grime to mask the unattractive facial features of the actor in question.......however, I can't really tell, so I need to move in a little closer.....






Sucker+Punch+Premiere+Outside+Arrivals+ff3q5gINW3jl.jpg


(Breathing hard) Hmmmmm......., in examining the smile in exhibit D, it is certainly possible that the subject is growing less attractive, but I'm not really sure. I think I need to analyze another photo in order to be sure:

daang.jpg


(Mops brow with closest nearby cloth-like substance) Exhibit E is clearly another attempt to mask the subject's objectionable facial features by exposing his hairy chest. Must.....move....along......

largewhateverworksblura.jpg


(Heart rate accelerating rapidly) In this close up candid photo, one might possibly be able to say that Henry is no longer as attractive as he seems.....(excuse me while I go get a drink of water; I'm suddenly feeling dehydrated)

I think a full-on, clear photo of his face is in order at this point; note, if you will, exhibit somethingorother......

tumblr_lhn09mvalL1qa1yq9o1_r1_400.jpg


Right......(slightly wheezing)....I really don't have a comment at this point, so we should probably just move on......

henry-cavill-sucker-punch-london-premiere-05.jpg


(Gasping for breath) Okay, can't quite handle this, I think we just need need to pull back to something a little further away and safer......

normal_026.jpg


(Falls to floor, clutching chest in pain) OKAY, maybe pulling back to something further away is a bad idea. Sorry, I'm feeling really out of it and need to step away for a moment......


(Staggers to feet while thrusting index into the air) I think I've got it! The woman who stated that Henry was ugly close up must have had such a strong visceral response to him that she almost passed out! Consequently, she associated his photo with a general feeling of malaise and voila: the ugly close up is born!

I feel so much better now, considering that Henry is, after all, one of the few people on the planet who can be considered to be empirically attractive. :cwink:

On a more serious note, (or not), I do believe that Henry's attractiveness has directly led to some of the less than positive responses to Man of Steel. Case in point: after my first viewing, I left the theater feeling somewhat confused. I complained out loud that I thought it was pretty lame that Clark just happened to show up at the location of the ancient ship; I was really disappointed that there was no explanation. My husband and mother-in-law looked at my funny and told me that it was clearly explained by the military guys in the diner. Huh?? What?? There were military guys in the diner? And they were talking about something???

Oh yeah....wasn't that the scene when we first see Henry without the thick beard? I was staring at him so hard that I completely missed their conversation......

I'm telling you, his face is a real problem. It could seriously be affecting people's experience of the film. Poor guy. They're really going to have to do something about that.
 
Yeah, get a grip. Henry's hot **** and all, but good grief... :o
 
Athenaa, never try to rival Sawyer for the target of his affections. :o
 
It was a joke.

And thanks for making me feel welcome. Guess I'd better just stick to mindless one liners.
 
It was a joke.

And thanks for making me feel welcome. Guess I'd better just stick to mindless one liners.

It was great write up Athenaa. Thank you for your humor and detail...I am just jealous of Henry...:woot:
Oh and welcome to the Hype!
 
Thanks. :yay: Sorry if I overreacted; I was suddenly feeling a little silly, but I was just trying to make some people smile, and I figured, after lurking around here for a long time, that it was safe to go a little over the top.
 
Thanks. :yay: Sorry if I overreacted; I was suddenly feeling a little silly, but I was just trying to make some people smile, and I figured, after lurking around here for a long time, that it was safe to go a little over the top.

Welcome to the hype, Athenaa!
:highfive:
 
It was a joke.

And thanks for making me feel welcome. Guess I'd better just stick to mindless one liners.
That's a good line of thinkin' thar. As we Internet folk say, 'make us read more than two lines in a post and we'll cut ya." Nah... :p
 
tumblr_inline_mos55wzNh11qz4rgp.jpg


"I'll be bringing Superman" :hehe:

Look for pictures tomorrow!
 
Cavill at a premiere in a three-piece, looking like an affable Clark Kent.

 
Haha it doesn't work that way on the internet. Trust me i know a good deal about this stuff he was not anywhere near 5% bodyfat. You'd have seen a lot of striations and the like and none of that was visible, not to mention his abs weren't hugely visible.

Take a look at this chart:


Body-fat-percentage-photos.jpg


Henry-Cavill-Shirtless-on-the-Superman-Man-of-Steel-Set-2-600x393.jpg


Cavill is somewhere i'd estimate between 8-10% closer to 10% like i'd gauged earlier. Also remember mass doesn't have much to do with how high or low your body fat % is.
Different bodies will look different at different body fat percentages. So that's the there to begin with. Also for a comparison, when bodybuilders are showing their 3% body fat, they are enormously tanned, with torso shaved and posing and flexing to bring out the details of the physique, whereas Cavill has a very casual shot of walking looking pale with a hairy torso. So you might not see as much detail on Cavill as you would expect even at 3%. Unless Cavill did some physique shots, it would be difficult to judge.

I know that the 3% figure could have quoted around to create hype but I think the actual figure was definitely closer to that than 10. And for the abs, the above is not a great shot but in the movie when he is rummaging the clothes on the line, his abs really stuck out and look very clearly defined. We actually don't have many official stills to go by, but for a moment let's look at Immortals where he claimed he had around 5% body fat and shaved his torso for the definition to show.



























You can see that his pecs and abs are extremely sharply cut. The skin is stretched very tightly over the contours of his muscles for such definition to show. This is an indication that he wasn't carrying much fat. You can see even from his back that there isn't much fat there, the smallest muscles and tendons are showing up under his skin.

And he says he went much further for Man Of Steel, so he might have genuinely reached 3%. Maybe its just that we did not see a good presentation of his physique with the shaky cam and the chest hair and the casual stance. But even so I think the definiton was impressive and the abs really popped.
 
this looks like less than 3% body fat

2bgx.png


he could have been King Leonidas in 300!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"