Aside from that, fact can be stranger than fiction.
Indeed it can. One trip to a quantum physics wikia or textbook yields more bizarre things than one could possible imagine being true in our universe.
Aside from that, fact can be stranger than fiction.
if Interstellar was from Night movie fans and critics would destroy the movie.plus when Night has in every movie a predictable twist its bad. when Nolan has forced twist in the second or third acts movie after movie its no big deal.
Interstellar is a good movie. obvious . but to use M.Night as an example?
I'm not exactly sure where this movie fails, other than sound mixing. I think it pulled it off fine, the successes are massive and greatly exceed the minuses.
The hypothetical Interstellar directed by Shyalaman is irrelevant, if he had directed it it would have been a different movie. He made After Earth just last year.

It's a fact that Nolan diehards like to watch all his work through rose colored glasses but any other director that would have ended his film in the same manner (for one example) would be mocked out of the cinema. Put the words "m knight shyamalan" over this title or have Nolan use a pseudo name and release the exact same cut and most people would be blasting this thing unmercifully. There honestly can be no doubt about that.
Honestly...if M. Night had made Interstellar, you might have people people calling it a major comeback/return to form. If Spielberg had made this movie, the reception might be even better.
If anything, most of the bias I'm seeing towards this movie is more of a bias against Nolan.
Like DA Champion says, everyone brings a level of bias into the movie theater one way or another.

Come on, mayne.![]()
Nolan is the victim here.

Well, I personally love seeing the context of your posts change every time I refresh. Never change, Batlobster.
*I'll edit this later to look annoyed.

Maybe it's just me reading too much science literature over the years but was the 5th dimensional concept confusing to some people?
