ShadowBoxing
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 30,620
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Harping on an old cliche here.
Okay, in the modern world the typical idea is "Jocks are the natural predator to geeks and nerds".
You walk around a local comic store and the regular customers and (usually) shop owners don't scream "Jocks". Very seldom (not to say it never happens) do fans of comics/fantasy/sci-fi ever become jock or jockish type people. While the stereotype may be unfair, it is certainly not without it's hint of truth.
Most geeks forcus more or being creative and smart than they do on athletics.
However while most characters in comics/fantasy/sci-fi are definitely sometimes creative and smart they have one underlying thing that is almost always the case. They are jocks.
Being a Jedi requires great balance and coordination. Being a resident of Sin City or a star of a QT film requires you to be one bada$$ muddaf***er who can beat the ever living sh** out of people. Being Batman requires not only intellectual pursuits, but also a body honed to physical perfection. Being a superhero immediately means you look like you live your days and nights for your gym. Being from LOTR means you know at least some traditional middle aged fighting techniques.
Furthermore all heroes in western culture are usually based on the traditional Roman/Greek heroes such as Achilles and Odyssius (Harry Potter being a counter example).
So immediately we know most geeks at least look up to the characters they watch/read about. So why are they usually so much the opposite of the characters they love. Why are there not more geeks who are suave with women? Why are more geeks not star athletes. Would it not make more sense if geeks emulated the things they love. Furthermore why are jocks considered enemies, would a geek not want to surround himself with people like those in his stories.
I realize, knowing people from my gym, that superheroes and fantasy characters often are a source and drive for bodybuilders and athletes. But usually it is not the norm. My main question though is: Why isn't this the case most of the time? Why don't most geeks become like those they are fans of? Shouldn't jocks and geeks not be seen as counter to eachother?
Okay, in the modern world the typical idea is "Jocks are the natural predator to geeks and nerds".
You walk around a local comic store and the regular customers and (usually) shop owners don't scream "Jocks". Very seldom (not to say it never happens) do fans of comics/fantasy/sci-fi ever become jock or jockish type people. While the stereotype may be unfair, it is certainly not without it's hint of truth.
Most geeks forcus more or being creative and smart than they do on athletics.
However while most characters in comics/fantasy/sci-fi are definitely sometimes creative and smart they have one underlying thing that is almost always the case. They are jocks.
Being a Jedi requires great balance and coordination. Being a resident of Sin City or a star of a QT film requires you to be one bada$$ muddaf***er who can beat the ever living sh** out of people. Being Batman requires not only intellectual pursuits, but also a body honed to physical perfection. Being a superhero immediately means you look like you live your days and nights for your gym. Being from LOTR means you know at least some traditional middle aged fighting techniques.
Furthermore all heroes in western culture are usually based on the traditional Roman/Greek heroes such as Achilles and Odyssius (Harry Potter being a counter example).
So immediately we know most geeks at least look up to the characters they watch/read about. So why are they usually so much the opposite of the characters they love. Why are there not more geeks who are suave with women? Why are more geeks not star athletes. Would it not make more sense if geeks emulated the things they love. Furthermore why are jocks considered enemies, would a geek not want to surround himself with people like those in his stories.
I realize, knowing people from my gym, that superheroes and fantasy characters often are a source and drive for bodybuilders and athletes. But usually it is not the norm. My main question though is: Why isn't this the case most of the time? Why don't most geeks become like those they are fans of? Shouldn't jocks and geeks not be seen as counter to eachother?