Colossal Spoons
Paper boi
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 62,823
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 58
well...i'm going to be picking it up since i'm loyal to the ultimate u.
Right there w/ ya. Except for Spider-man, F him

well...i'm going to be picking it up since i'm loyal to the ultimate u.

Right there w/ ya. Except for Spider-man, F him![]()
it's more like saying if I put stop & shop brand cola in you're coke bottle you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, but if you drank the brand soda from the brand bottle you'd say it taste like ****.like saying we wouldn't know the difference between someone giving us chocolates or someone hitting us with a baseball bat as long as they were both called gifts.
No one is calling you ******ed. At least I'm not. And I may be in the minority but if Millar wrote his characters one way and then all of a sudden change their personalities no I would not love. Don't take it upon yourself to make broad sweeping generalizations. IMO it is a bad story no matter whose name was attached to it. If that makes me a *****e bag then I'll be that for sure.wow you guys are *****e bags you strait up called me ******ed for something you all know is true. if Millar wrote Ultimates 3 and it was the same exact thing as what Loeb wrote you'd love it. and its not like
it's more like saying if I put stop & shop brand cola in you're coke bottle you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, but if you drank the brand soda from the brand bottle you'd say it taste like ****.
Ult Spidey is the only good thing left in the Ult U right now.
Hopefully Ult Avengers will change that, but still...

BTW, this whole thread is dangerously close to being on the Last Chance list![]()
No one is calling you ******ed. At least I'm not. And I may be in the minority but if Millar wrote his characters one way and then all of a sudden change their personalities no I would not love. Don't take it upon yourself to make broad sweeping generalizations. IMO it is a bad story no matter whose name was attached to it. If that makes me a *****e bag then I'll be that for sure.
hey hey I'll make all the generalizations I want, but I apologize for lumping you into my generalization. I'm not saying it was a good story by any means it's very mediocre, but seeing people complain about Jeff Loeb makes me realize how people take comics too serious. Jeff Loeb was trying something new with the characters, but we care to much about continuity and the previous writers characterization that we can't even accept someone else's take on the characters. comics are supposed to be fun.

Really??? Pete's not going to be Spidey?![]()
Originally posted by bryanss3
No what I'm saying is the Ultimates are fairly a new comic still. People take changes so negatively now. No one writes Spider-man the same way Stan Lee wrote him yet over 40 years ago. Remember when Peter smacked MJ? What I'm trying to get at is we are all to serious about continuity and characterization. New writers are allowed to change characterizations if that weren't the case a lot of characters wouldn't be where they are now. Continuity has become such an awful thing IMO right now because if anyone writes anything its over analyzed to death. its a fictional story why do people go so crazy about stuff. And if the stories are bad get mad at the company who puts their name on it and the editors who "say yeah this is great" instead of saying "this needs a rewrite" cause it's truly their fault when you get a bad story.
Mark Millar wouldnt have raped his own characters the way Jeph Loeb did.