I'd be more worried about WWZ than MU. I've heard of bunch of people discussing it. I personally have no interest in it since they turned the book into Zombie movie #81237. I still need to see FF6, IM3, and Pacific Rim. No time for Brad Pitt.
There is a buzz surrounding MU? i honestly haven't noticed it....
That said, i agree with you that MOS is facing some competitions the coming weeks, but to be only nr 1 for one week? and MU being the movie that knock it off the 1st place?
That's...sounds to pessimistic to me.
I'd be more worried about WWZ than MU. I've heard of bunch of people discussing it. I personally have no interest in it since they turned the book into Zombie movie #81237. I still need to see FF6, IM3, and Pacific Rim. No time for Brad Pitt.
I do. MU is going to be big hit and WWZ's problems don't seem to be affecting its buzz either. Basically, MOS has one shot to make its financial power known. After that, there are too many movies that serve the same audience.
60M isn't a possibility.. with this much hype, I think the advanced ticket sales would surpass that... so, even if the movie sucked big time, people would have gone to watch it... the theaters at my place is already half booked...
You’re getting confused here. Iron Man 3 only has one previous film that has a predecessor (Iron Man 2) and that didn’t see a big increase on the 1st film, and actually a decrease domestically. I’m not sure whether you’re focusing on domestic or international but it’s wrong either way:Actually, irrespective of Marvel's Avengers, "Iron Man 3" more than likely would have made as much as it did since it was a sequel (the third in a trilogy) and the previous films made progressively more than their predecessors. Furthermore, it was the performance of Robert Downey, Jr. that made both Marvel's "Avengers" and the Iron Man films so successful. He is a true A-List actor and commands a lot of money at the box office. It is not that much a matter of putting together a great team of superheros, but more so a great screenplay and the chemistry of the team of actors (the early Star Wars films outside of Alec Guinness had a cast that was made up of a bunch of unknowns but yet was still had a series of top grossing films). As far as a solo superhero film doing better than a great team film, I honestly believe that "The Dark Knight Rises" would have matched the success of Marvel's "Avengers" had there not been that incident in Denver. To sum it up I don't' think what you say is all together true.
That's the risk for this film. It may actually need to open big to counter threats to its legs.
If it opened in august or late july it would have more breathing room to try to succeed on good WOM regardless of a very big OW.
It'll easily have the legs. There's some competition but they won't be a big deal. It's making a billion. I said it right after the first teaser came out last summer and I'm sticking it to it. Easily reaches a billion
It'll easily have the legs. There's some competition but they won't be a big deal. It's making a billion. I said it right after the first teaser came out last summer and I'm sticking it to it. Easily reaches a billion
Why? Because you said so? I don't see your reasoning besides hype. TASM had huge hype, OW was 62M.
You need a solid turnout for 3 days, not just 1 to have a big OW. Like I said, if this movie is not well liked by the critics, some people might skip watching it opening weekend.
Why? Because you said so? I don't see your reasoning besides hype. TASM had huge hype, OW was 62M.
You need a solid turnout for 3 days, not just 1 to have a big OW. Like I said, if this movie is not well liked by the critics, some people might skip watching it opening weekend.
To be clear, we are talking about the MoS sequel here right?
And to be frank, yes.
People are intimidated by the idea that a singular film that isn't some mega Avengers like event can "out earn every WB film ever made". If you look at it objectively, Ironman is a singular film, with a hero a lot less known that Superman. That film has out grossed all WB films in history if not for but one. Now I'm not saying MoS is in any position to out do IM3's totals, that film had a unearned major boost form Joss Whedon and the marvel machine. But the reality is that, that film isn't some big event onto itself. It's just got alot of momentum behind it. People wanted to be a part of the conversation and Marvel even advertised the film with Avengers footage...
Do you honestly think MoS2 won't have massive momentum behind it? Especially when the shameless universe building starts to get rolling. Scenario one, Batman himself shows up in the hotly anticipated sequel(bruce wayne in the trailer). Pretty sure it would have a shot at IM3's title with just that.
All Robinov(or whomever) needed say was something along the lines of: "We have a film here that might be a bigger hit than that (unfriendly to walk in audiences) Harry Potter finale." He may have still been overstating, but given that's what he literally meant, the statement isn't all that hard for me to digest.
WB needs a film that can do Batman numbers domestically and big SkyFall/Inception/HP numbers overseas. A superman franchise with momentum behind it is just the product to do it. It has more of a shot than these Hobbit cash ins.
It didn't have a regular 3 day opening. 4th of July.
MOS isn't really appealing to kids.
Yes.. because I said so...
And my 'say so' is just as valid as your 'say so'...
I don't really see Man of Steel being very successful and breaking records. Its probably going to perform like Fast/Furious 6 but with lower numbers.