The point is not them showing up in a team-up movie down the road. I am sure she will. The point is this show itself is not a movie. So, Kate Bishop is not being selected to headline a potential billion dollar film franchise. That is my point.
You so missed my point. That's the complete opposite of my argument. My point is if Captain America is a film franchise, which it is, then taking Falcon Cap and making him the star of a show is a downgrade to the Captain America IP. Therefore, Steve Rogers, the star of actual films and was selected to go out and gross Marvel billions and thus they put some of the best minds behind it, will look superior to the guy who is on a show that is made for less money and is not getting that type of return to the company, and thus not that level of focus. Thus, Falcon is living in Steve's shadow and not being treated as an equal. If you want a true legacy character, it should be a 1 for 1 trade. Falcon Cap should be starring in a movie, not a show. Otherwise, again, it devalues what it means to be, in this example, Captain America. That is my point. Same applies for Iron Man, Thor, Hulk, etc. Hawkeye works here because he was a side character that never got a movie, so Kate is actually trading up relative to where Clint was. But a guy like Falcon will be trading down (if that's the route they go).
To put it more easily, if my example of Falcon not headlining a Captain America movie and is only getting a show instead, he's basically just Falcon in a red, white, and blue costume. Because he is not being given the same level of respect. That's an unfair shadow to put him in.