Iron Man's popularity over all has earned him the place he has in the MCU
I'm perfectly content with the overall humor level in Marvel films but Ultron himself did not feel much at all like the character as I have known him most of my life and his Stark 2.0 personality is the primary reason why. There's no "narrative" other than I simply didn't enjoy Whedon's take on the character.
Terribly sorry to rock the big MCU boat. I know how a little criticism gets frowned upon around here but I'm afraid I must stick to my guns or I'd lose all respect for myself.
I would suggest overemphasis on Stark is a wider problem but that might get me lynched.
Loved this scene.
Just because someone is more terrible doesn't mean another a good personUltron sucked D00M was much better
When Ultron said,"My Vision". I was squealing like a little girl because that's how he refers to him in the comics.
Just because someone is more terrible doesn't mean another a good person
It is called opinion and I understand why quite massive amount of people found him disappointing in the movie as the big bad of Avengers
Ultron has an actual personality but that doesn't make him a great villain,he is one of the better MCU villians,that is about it
He is not Joker,and not even as good as Loki who I consider overrated,but at least Loki survived more than 3 movies
A basic C-list villain Yellowjacket was even more threatening than him despite he was weak in his fights with Antman as well
I have no interest to bring about how weak Ultron was in the movie again since the comics and cartoons both showcase what a truly powerful high intelligent strong robot can be,movie Ultron sucks so bad in comparison
And I still can't get over how easy his plan is stopped
Tony and Thor stopped his plan in seconds
He should have killed both in the beginning
Oh wait,Ultron got pwned twice by Ironman and didn't manage to kill Thor even when he had the chance and knew Thor was his biggest threat
Was this a really high intelligent killing unstoppable robot that described in the movie preview?
I can understand why some people like him,if they are big fans of majority of MCU movies
Those films were never considered to be taken seriously
Russo Bros will show Whedon why they will direct the next 3 biggest MCU movies of phase 3
Just because someone is more terrible doesn't mean another a good person
It is called opinion and I understand why quite massive amount of people found him disappointing in the movie as the big bad of Avengers
Ultron has an actual personality but that doesn't make him a great villain,he is one of the better MCU villians,that is about it
He is not Joker,and not even as good as Loki who I consider overrated,but at least Loki survived more than 3 movies
A basic C-list villain Yellowjacket was even more threatening than him despite he was weak in his fights with Antman as well
I have no interest to bring about how weak Ultron was in the movie again since the comics and cartoons both showcase what a truly powerful high intelligent strong robot can be,movie Ultron sucks so bad in comparison
And I still can't get over how easy his plan is stopped
Tony and Thor stopped his plan in seconds
He should have killed both in the beginning
Oh wait,Ultron got pwned twice by Ironman and didn't manage to kill Thor even when he had the chance and knew Thor was his biggest threat
Was this a really high intelligent killing unstoppable robot that described in the movie preview?
I can understand why some people like him,if they are big fans of majority of MCU movies
Those films were never considered to be taken seriously
Russo Bros will show Whedon why they will direct the next 3 biggest MCU movies of phase 3
Just because someone is more terrible doesn't mean another a good person
It is called opinion and I understand why quite massive amount of people found him disappointing in the movie as the big bad of Avengers
Ultron has an actual personality but that doesn't make him a great villain,he is one of the better MCU villians,that is about it
He is not Joker,and not even as good as Loki who I consider overrated,but at least Loki survived more than 3 movies
A basic C-list villain Yellowjacket was even more threatening than him despite he was weak in his fights with Antman as well
I have no interest to bring about how weak Ultron was in the movie again since the comics and cartoons both showcase what a truly powerful high intelligent strong robot can be,movie Ultron sucks so bad in comparison
And I still can't get over how easy his plan is stopped
Tony and Thor stopped his plan in seconds
He should have killed both in the beginning
Oh wait,Ultron got pwned twice by Ironman and didn't manage to kill Thor even when he had the chance and knew Thor was his biggest threat
Was this a really high intelligent killing unstoppable robot that described in the movie preview?
I can understand why some people like him,if they are big fans of majority of MCU movies
Those films were never considered to be taken seriously
Russo Bros will show Whedon why they will direct the next 3 biggest MCU movies of phase 3
Ultron didn't want to kill the Avengers lol That was never his endgame. And you really think Whedon was gonna kill off Thor? And don't contradict yourself. You said that people disliking Ultron is their opinion. Fair enough but now you're generalizing that any one who likes Ultron are just big fans of the MCU because their films can't be taken seriously? It that a sin? Nope it isn't. If you don't like their direction, don't watch them.
I'm pretty sure if Whedon wanted to direct the two IW films he'd have done it. He stepped down for obvious reason. And one of the reason why the first two Avengers are successful in the first place is because of Whedon. In any lesser hands I don't think they'd have been as good as they are. Its really finny how people are suddenly turned against Whedon now.
As far as I'm aware, it was Joss' own personal goal to have Age of Ultron not be longer than the first Avengers filmMarvel didnt help with not allowing him a longer run time or allowing him to go darker with Ultron.
As far as I'm aware, it was Joss' own personal goal to have Age of Ultron not be longer than the first Avengers film
Yep, It was Whedons obsession with having the movie shorter than the original....which is frankly stupid.
As far as I'm aware, it was Joss' own personal goal to have Age of Ultron not be longer than the first Avengers film
http://www.cinemablend.com/m/new/Joss-Whedon-First-Cut-Avengers-Age-Ultron-Was-Way-Longer-70850.html"There's one or two things that I'm unhappy about not having in there, but they're small. I said to [Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige] before we started, 'My secret fantasy that'll never come true is that the second one is shorter than the first.' And we're shorter by a minute."
Sorry I don't believe that, Marvel is notorious for not allowing a movie to be over a certain length or kids would lose interest. Also, Joss has since talked about battles with Marcel about keeping certain scenes in and taking other ones out, etc. I think Joss was just being professional when he said he wanted it shorter than the first movie.
Do you have a link to this? First time I've heard about this tbh.
I don't I am afraid, but I assure you its not something I made up, I actually heard it from another poster but can't remember who.
Ahh thats very strange considering 3 of their highest grossing films have long run times.
With the exception of TDK, the rest were way over long and bloated especially the last 3 TF films and TDKR.
You don't need a long ass run time to tell a good story. Its a double edged sword. Pacing is the key issue.
Ultron was ****ing awesome in this. He's jab at Captain America was funny and very honest at the same time. And when he called Caps shield a "Frisbee".