He needs to be tapping Betty Brant.
I am leaning towards SM4 being a stand alone movie, and this won't be an intended trilogy (much like the previous films).
^You a mod, *****?
Don't ban me for that. It was due to shock.
I think it should be Peter & MJ instead. I want to see them get married and live happy togeather. As for Gwen, as I siad before, since it was her introduction in Spidey3, in Spidey4 she could have a bigger role, but not try to date him. They could just be friends.What do you think if, following SM3, we get Peter and MJ working things out, but friends, not a couple... Maybe a single Parker could be a better choice, specially if Gwen is back in the story...
Just checked the link again.. It's now a 2010 release..
weird...
either they just made it up and are now revising it or the studio told them to change the release date...
I'm still hoping for an R-rated Spider-Man 4. That says f--- soccer moms and their children. What are my chances?
I'm still hoping for an R-rated Spider-Man 4. That says f--- soccer moms and their children. What are my chances?
lmao good oneSlimmer than Kirsten Dunst.
so does this pretty much mean that SM4 won't be like the trilogy?
for sureMost likely. But the only difference would be that you won't have a subplot that will stretch through several movies (like Harry). It also means you won't see any returning villains.
I'm fine with a 2009 or 2010 release date. As long as the film is great and they work as hard as they can and it ends up being an amazing film like the first three films were, then I'm fine with it.Just checked the link again.. It's now a 2010 release..
James Vanderbilt, writer of Zodiac, has been hired to write the fourth installment.
http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/10/spider-man-4-wr.html