The Amazing Spider-Man Spider-Man Reboot Costume Part 4 - "What's that in his eye??" edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Haha Yeah, I wasn't a big fan when Peter ripped his shirt to reveal the costume hidden underneath in SM1. Peter doesn't do that; Clark Kent would do that.
 
THis is true. But what about the kissing scene in the first movie of Spider-man. He had a neckline when mary jane Rolled off a little of his mask.
Oh, yeah, I almost forgot about that scene. There was a neckline while MJ was taking his mask off. Hm...I got to go with Troy Parker's explanation.
 
Man you guys look too much into things. The v-neck is for promotional shots because it looks "nicer." That's it. I can't believe you guys are even thinking there's more to this.
 
I hate that shirt ripping scene. He rips his shirt in broad daylight with hundreds of people around. I know there's a lot of panic but seriously not one person notices. Superman should be the only one to be able to do the shirt ripping.

Explosions and gunfire from have a way of distracting you from other things.
 
Btw, I'm currently making a design for what the black costume could look in the reboot series
 
spiderman.jpg



fB0pP.png



It's happened before.
I noticed the same thing in Spider-Man 3
peter_black_suit.jpg


spiderman%2Bemo.jpg


:woot: It makes no sense. Neck part of the costume is different in two scenes when he has regular clothes on.
 
Last edited:
Haha Yeah, I wasn't a big fan when Peter ripped his shirt to reveal the costume hidden underneath in SM1. Peter doesn't do that; Clark Kent would do that.
He's done it it in the comics, so I don't see why it's a bad thing that he did it in the previous trilogy.
 
Man you guys look too much into things. The v-neck is for promotional shots because it looks "nicer." That's it. I can't believe you guys are even thinking there's more to this.

It really doesn't look better... or worse. I wouldn't think different of the suit if it had the turtleneck.

We're just discussing this because we don't have anything else to talk about. :\

Unless you want to talk about the black crotch again? :P
 
I think just because Superman made it so iconic it seems jarring to viewers maybe. I didn't mind it, actually, but I can see why some would think it belongs to Superman.
 
yeah i didn't like that shirt-ripping scene either, in the comics its alright because everyone knows its done as a homage to Superman, but put it in the movie, and everyone calls 'rip-off'.

Also I wonder if he will actually wear his suit under his clothes, in USM doesn't he carry it around in his bag? thats why he has such a big bag?
 
Would you guys really hate it if Peter ends up using a wetsuit for the base of his costume? It would certainly explain the seams and whatnot... and it wouldn't be like he's starting from scratch, which some people have a problem with.

He could get a plain wetsuit like this, print out some designs onto it... and so on.

fluxl_sred__82623.jpg


They used neoprene for the Raimi suits anyways, didn't they?
 
Every single movie changed the costume in some aspects. Even the color.
 
I hated the colours (the red) in Spider-Man 2... I could stand the blue, but the red looked almost pink in some scenes.
 
I guess you guys have different red vision than I.
 
I guess you guys have different red vision than I.

Yep.

SM2caps.png


They muted the colours far too much.

As I've said, I didn't/don't mind the blue looking almost black. I think red and black looks cool. But they muted the red far too much, the colours were better in SM and SM3.
 
Seeing that suit makes me cry that I will never get to see it again :(
 
Maybe. But at least it's red, unlike Superman Returns' "muted red" boots and cape that were brown. lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"