Reikowolf
Hyperphotonic
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2002
- Messages
- 2,340
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
There are no mental leaps required.
The explosion is shown from a very far distance -- you can't possibly claim that Bruce is quite clearly in the Bat when it's destroyed.
Again, you're ignoring some serious evidence here.
1. We're not shown that Batman dies explicitly.
2. The autopilot fix is mentioned.
3. The bat signal is repaired despite the fact that everyone thinks Batman is dead and a statue has been erected.
4. Blake is given GPS coordinates to the batcave after the fact.
5. The pearl necklace is missing from the manifest.
6. Alfred gets a note mentioning this. The necklace has a tracking device that leads him to the cafe.
7. We're shown explicitly that Bruce and Selina are in the cafe, fulfilling Alfred's earlier "wish" foreshadowed at the start of the movie.
8. We know they had identity-wiping software, so it doesn't really matter if someone recognizes them.
In order for your interpretation to work, you have to basically ignore all of this and assume evidence is fake and that Alfred is just hallucinating his vision. It's not ambiguous. You're just making something ambiguous because you want it to be.
agreed, which is why I feel Nolan showed Bruce and Selina at the end instead of a more enigmatic ending with Alfred simply smiling.
I know there was a lot of debate over the spinning top at the end of inception. To that end, I feel the ending was very clear. Nolan has shown a talent for laying things out very clearly in his films.
If you pay close attention, even Miranda Tate's lines are very carefully chosen to hark back to Ras Al Ghul's lines from batman begins
"doing what is necessary" specifically.