Jack Giroux said:According to the films co-writer, Bob Gale, theres a chance more of the Eric Stoltz Back to the Future footage will see the light of day.
Im not going to say never. We did not destroy the footage, because we expect that sometime, in some future anniversary, we may let it get out there. They may see it sometime. Im not going to say for sure, much less when. But I will say that we had the opportunity to completely destroy it. And we did not. So, it does exist in a vault somewhere.
Most double-dip Blu-ray sets arent worth buying, but if the special features on another Back to the Future boxset include more of the original actors performance, itll be worth the purchase. Gale also had this to say about Stoltzs serious take on Marty McFly:
I have seen all of the Eric Stoltz footage, and we would not be having this conversation! The movie would have been released. But it would not have caught on the way it did. I dont think it would have been successful enough to make two sequels.
The newspapers do, but the photos of Marty's family in Part I and Doc's Tombstone in Part III do change without them looking at it.

I'm wanting to put Mine in a display frame. I even kept the Receipt for the 30th Anniversary Bluray set I got yesterday and put it with it. lolNabbed a newspaper today, looks neat along side my TDK Gotham Times.
I remember an interview with the actor who plays Biff (can't think of his name at the moment) and him stating that Stoltz was a real A-hole on set, and a lot of the other cast members felt the same.![]()
From what I understood and read, the guy takes his craft wayyyyy too seriously to the point of pretentiousness. Tom Wilson (Biff) once talked about shooting the scene in the cafeteria when he shoves Marty how they had to do multiple takes and each time Stoltz was shoving him even harder to the point that Wilson was real close to losing his cool and punching him.
He just went at the role in a way that I'm sure Gale and Zemekis didn't intend. Just way too intense of an actor for a sci-fi comedy.
[YT]cgb3zk-5m4w[/YT]
Forward to 1:30
I thought it was interesting Fox averted saying Erc Stolz name.
"There was another actor who did like 9 weeks on the movie"
What I don't understand is that Eric's version of Marty wore all black, no vest, just a black jacket. More liken to The Cure.
So when Zemeckis decided to change the wardrobe for Fox, was the life preserver joke improvised, or just added to the script at the last minute?
thats the story that they tell .but why if they wanted Fox they got Stolz who was so different? i think there is a small chance that they just changed their mind with Stolz and years later they decided to tell the story like they wanted Fox from the beginning.Yeah he was doing Family Ties. Fox was their first choice though. They decided they would pursue him again even if it meant costing them and writing off several weeks of shooting. They felt that Fox had a personality more like McFly whereas Stoltz was just acting the part and doing a more dramatic take. So I think they wanted it more like Fox's interpretation to start with.
