The Dark Knight Rises The Christopher Nolan Thread

Will you be excited about Nolan's Non-Batman films in the future?

  • Yes! He's a great director.

  • No! I like Nolan because of Batman.

  • Ehh, it depends on the movie.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nolan's main detractors come from such a mass generalization of a few of his failings in certain films. pretty much what his naysayers usually say is a) he hates cgi b) he's not an action director. Those two elements are such prominent (not integral) element in comic book films in general, that when faced with these generalizations one could imagine that he's not good at adapting comic book films. Add to the fact that he takes a lot of liberties from source material, and it tends to rub people wrong.

This is all fine and good if it wasn't entirely refutable. He doesn't hate CGI, his batman films which are supposedly cgi-lite, have such a great SUBTLE use of cgi, he uses cgi the way it's meant to be used, instead of using it as a crutch. He is also a self confessed fan of michael bay, as well as his kubrickian and hitchcockian influences he is suprisingly very influenced by summer blockbusters. He approached Batman Begins with a mind similar to that of Richard Donner in the first superman film, Inception only proves his evolution as an action director, if you don't think the rotating hallway is one of the most innovative action scenes ever, then i don't know what will impress you.

If there was ever any real complaint against Nolan's work it would be that some of his stuff may feel a bit cold, emotionless and frigid. He also has a lack of real strong female roles.

In a way Inception took any complaint directed at him and pretty much answered each one, with his best action scenes, some great female roles and a pretty intense emotional core for multiple characters, even if you don't like inceptions story (and some of you don't) Inception can only refute a lot of these criticisms.

yeah I REALLY liked Inception if you can tell lol.

I couldn't agree more :) Very well put. I do believe that deep down Nolan's just as much a film-geek as the rest of us, but really? He confessed to be a Michael Bay fan!? Wow.

I loved how in one of his Batman Begins interviews he kept referring back to Sam Raimi's original Spider-Man and how he was in love with the first-half where they show Peter's origin, but then disliked the jump of the costume. That shows how attentive or respectful he is of the genre.

And yes, those really are about the fairest criticisms one can hold up to him. I think his more cerebral kind of filmmaking alludes to that lack of emotional gravity that most other films carry, but he is at least conscious of it, and The Dark Knight had a lot of emotional moments that I personally adore. Same with Inception and The Prestige (Jackman gets a lot of praise for his performance in the latter but Bale was simply brilliant in it - and he arguably had the harder job to pull it off as well). The Bruce Wayne role demands a level of laconic, emotionless expression, but I think what Bale managed to exude despite that is this frustrated, angry Wayne who at the very bottom of his soul is just demented by the world around him. Stuff like that goes unnoticed. :(

And I absolutely agree with your comment regarding the use of CGI. He uses it like a pro, Nolan does, and augments it within the cinematography of his movies. Two-Face is exemplary in that way.

As for the women...well, yeah that's true as well. I think it has a lot to do with Nolan's love of Carl Jung though - most of his protagonists are scarred men who have this almost archetypal idolization of the women in their lives. It's in every single movie! I think with Catwoman that might be a progression, but let's not assume too much. For all we know, she's simply another reactionary "freak" to the goddamn batman.

You don't like Joker by Nolan? :wow:

Wait.. no... did I say that?! :wow: NO I meant you could make a case that Nolan took too many liberties with the Joker that essentially moved away from the core of the character - I said you COULD, not that I'll try :D I'm a believer of multiple interpretations, I love that crazy clown with zero empathy!

Wolverine sucked, but I have a thing for the first two X-men movies. As 99% of the people out there I'm waiting for X4 in 2D by Singer. Which WILL be made.

Do you want some Ice Tea? :csad:

:oldrazz: (reminds me of yesterday when I found cockroach bits in my Iced Tea at the campus cafe, but eh.......... different story that one ) I agree with you there - I want more X-Men!

Yeah, because even though it's the character that Jackman will always be known for, it was a lot more challenging if Aronofsky had stayed on.

So I cannot say I look forward to it...

I do look forward to...

NOLAN FOR BOND 24 :awesome:

Eh........ no. Not me. I think we got a good taste of Nolan handling these larger-than-life superheroes for one lifetime. I'd like to see more movies like The Prestige and Inception from him. Or, as someone have already said, something that's set in an historical period. Nolan could do wonders with a figure like, say Caligula or Doctor Faustus. But really, that's just me arrogantly demanding more magic, it's a little unfair.
 
I couldn't agree more :) Very well put. I do believe that deep down Nolan's just as much a film-geek as the rest of us, but really? He confessed to be a Michael Bay fan!? Wow.

I loved how in one of his Batman Begins interviews he kept referring back to Sam Raimi's original Spider-Man and how he was in love with the first-half where they show Peter's origin, but then disliked the jump of the costume. That shows how attentive or respectful he is of the genre.

And yes, those really are about the fairest criticisms one can hold up to him. I think his more cerebral kind of filmmaking alludes to that lack of emotional gravity that most other films carry, but he is at least conscious of it, and The Dark Knight had a lot of emotional moments that I personally adore. Same with Inception and The Prestige (Jackman gets a lot of praise for his performance in the latter but Bale was simply brilliant in it - and he arguably had the harder job to pull it off as well). The Bruce Wayne role demands a level of laconic, emotionless expression, but I think what Bale managed to exude despite that is this frustrated, angry Wayne who at the very bottom of his soul is just demented by the world around him. Stuff like that goes unnoticed. :(

And I absolutely agree with your comment regarding the use of CGI. He uses it like a pro, Nolan does, and augments it within the cinematography of his movies. Two-Face is exemplary in that way.

As for the women...well, yeah that's true as well. I think it has a lot to do with Nolan's love of Carl Jung though - most of his protagonists are scarred men who have this almost archetypal idolization of the women in their lives. It's in every single movie! I think with Catwoman that might be a progression, but let's not assume too much. For all we know, she's simply another reactionary "freak" to the goddamn batman.

I like michael bay myself, his films are dumber than a sack of bricks, but he doesn't know how to hold back, he's going to put his all on the cinema just to make you drop your jaw at least once. Thor never made me drop my jaw once, and it's a much better written film than any of his transformers films.
 
Terry Gilliam comments on Nolan's filmmaking.

http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/121/1213905p1.html

In a wide-ranging interview with the Los Angeles Times' Hero Complex, acclaimed director Terry Gilliam (Brazil, Twelve Monkeys, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus) spoke about the work of director Christopher Nolan and compared The Dark Knight to one of the most popular video games of all time.

"The car chase stuff in Dark Knight is a video game; it is shot-for-shot, as you would get it in a video game like Grand Theft Auto," said Gilliam. "(Nolan's) got a weird balance; he understands all of that – the energy of it – so he chooses to put it in there yet he's also a very intelligent filmmaker who can do all sorts of things. He's incredibly good."



Gilliam didn't just stop with TDK: "With Inception, I wondered why all of the dreams were action movies. Don't people have other dreams? And what's interesting about the films are they are asexual. Maybe that's the problem. Women can represent danger in them but no one seems to be having sex in these movies."

Terry Gilliam also speaks candidly about Transformers: Dark of the Moon, Tintin, Steven Spielberg, James Cameron and composer John Williams in the interview, so go check out the Hero Complex link above for more.

...Thoughts?
 
I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but I've really gotten to dislike Nolan's approach to Batman, as well as the movies themselves. While I don't necessarily want the B&R approach, I don't think Batman should be given the "serious realistic crime thriller" treatment either. Among several other issues I have with both films, they just seem to put on a veneer of being deep and thought-provoking (a.k.a. the constant speeches analyzing the action in philosophical terms) despite being actually pretty lame and uninteresting. I don't think his Batman movies are horrible, just seriously overrated.
 
My lord, over half that interview was just Terry b---hing about other people's work.
 
I detected a hint of jealousy and or resentment from that interview. A lot of the "compliments" came with qualifications or digs lol.
 
Great article on where Chris talks about the interrogation scene, worth a read.

The “Dark Knight” director gives a deep dissection of his single favorite scene in the movie — the gripping interrogation sequence, which (with no special effects and only bare-bones lighting) would become “the fulcrum on which the whole movie turns.”



This is the second of a three-part interview with Christopher Nolan, the director of “The Dark Knight,” which was released in mid-July and is now approaching $1 billion in worldwide box office. The numbers are astounding, but even more startling is the fact that the 38-year-old filmmaker captured that kind of global audience with a movie that is relentlessly dark and finds its axis in the performance of Heath Ledger as the nihilistic and sadistic Joker.

I asked the London native to pick one scene in the film that he would circle as the essential moment in the movie, either in its service to the overall story or the film’s texture. He answered quickly.

Nolan: To be honest, it’s pretty easy for me. The scene that is so important and so central to me is the interrogation scene between Batman and the Joker in the film. When we were writing the script, that was always one of the central set pieces that we wanted to crack.

GB: At what point in the production schedule did you shoot it?

Nolan: On the set, we shot it fairly early on. It was actually one of the first things that Heath had to do as the Joker. He told me he was actually pretty excited to tear off a big chunk early on, really get one of the Joker’s key scenes up in the first three weeks of a seven-month shoot. He and I both liked the idea of just diving in, as did Christian [Bale, who portrayed Batman]. We had rehearsed the scene a tiny bit. We had just ripped through it a couple of times in pre-production just to get some slight feel of how it was going to work. Neither of them wanted to go too far with it in rehearsal. They had to rehearse some of the fight choreography, but even with that, we tried to keep it loose and improvisational. They wanted to save it all. We were all pretty excited to get on with a big chunk of dialogue and this big intense scene between these two iconic characters. It was quite bizarre to see Batman across the table across from the Joker [laughs]. I’m glad you asked this. You know, I could actually talk about this scene for hours.

We had a lot of time to shoot it too, because it was so early on. Quite often, as you get behind on other things and you run toward the end of the shoot, things can get very squeezed. But you tend to schedule the first few weeks very generously to give the crew and the actors and myself time to find our feet and find our pace. So we had a couple of days to do it.

GB: Can you give me a snapshot memory from those days shooting the scene?

Nolan: It was a great set built into a location. It had all of the advantages of feeling that we were in a real place. Nathan Crowley, the production designer, built these great mirrors and this long, tiled room that I really loved the look of; it had the feeling almost of an abattoir or something. That all fed into the brutality of the scene. We wanted to be very edgy, very brutal. We wanted it to be the point at which Batman is truly tested by the Joker and you see that the Joker is truly capable of getting under everybody’s skin. I’m realizing this now about that scene — I haven’t thought this through before — the synthesis of all the different elements that I’m most interested in within filmmaking all come in that scene.



Nolan: The scene starts between Gary Oldman [as James Gordon] and Heath with the lights out, and [director of photography] Wally Pfister literally just lit the scene with the desk lamp, the table lamp, and nothing else. And then when the lights come on, Batman is revealed, and the rest of the scene plays out with a massive overexposure. He overexposed like five stops, I want to say, and then printed it down to bring some of the color back in. But it’s this incredibly intense overhead light which let us move in any direction. We had a handheld camera and shot however we wanted, be very spontaneous.

For me creatively, that had been about inverting the expectation. We’ve all seen so many of these dark movie interrogation scenes where somebody is being given the third degree. We just wanted to completely flip that on its head. And have the bright, harsh, bleak light sort show you the Joker’s make-up and its decay. The Batsuit was redesigned for this film. And unlike the suit that we had in “Batman Begins,” it’s capable of really being shown in incredible detail and still hold up to that kind of scrutiny under that bright light. The suit looked much more real and more like a functional thing this time. The whole scene was about showing something real and brutal and getting this real harshness.

GB: There’s remarkable physicality of the actors in that scene. They are such different presences in the room: Christian is all dark mass and bottled fury and Heath has this spindly weirdness. …

Nolan: Yes, and I think you start to see it even at the beginning of the scene where everything is in closer. There are tight close-ups with just a little drift to the camera. We start in a very controlled way, but even within that frame, the way Heath is bobbing in and out —and he’s actually bobbing in and out of the focal plane because, you know, it’s very hard to follow someone whose leaning toward camera the whole time. It actually really adds something. We’re continually trying to catch him with the focus. You really see his movement back and forth. That way, even in a tight frame, you have this sense of strangeness. On the other hand, you have Batman sitting there just very, very controlled, restrained as you say. Then there’s a point where it spills over into real physicality and he drags the Joker across the table. We go handheld at that point and shot the rest of the scene with handheld to be very spontaneous in its movement. They had rehearsed the stunts and the fight stuff very specifically, but we really let the actors work within that. I had never seen anybody sell a punch the way Heath was able to with Christian. I got the violence I wanted. What I felt was really important creatively for the scene was that we show Batman going too far. We show him effectively torturing someone for information because it’s become personal.

Christian and I had talked a lot on “Batman Begins” about finding a moment in that film where you actually worry that Batman will go too far. A moment where his rage might spill over and he would break his rules. We never found that moment. It just wasn’t there in that story. There was a lot of strength and aggression in the way he played the part, but I don’t think the story provided that element of losing control. What the Joker provides in the second film is the fact that his entire motivation is to push people’s buttons and find their rules set and it turn it on itself. And Batman of course places such importance on his rules, his morals. It’s what distinguishes him, in his mind, from a common vigilante. The Joker is able to twist him around and make him question his own approach and his own actions.

GB: In the first film, the Batman’s most memorable moments of intense aggression feel more like theater — he’s doing it in a calculated show to scare people. The first movie seems to be about Batman’s fear; the second one is about his rage.

Nolan: Exactly. That’s why we never found that moment of danger, the one we had talked about, where there’s this danger that Batman will just lose it and go too far. That rage is very much a central part of the story in ‘The Dark Knight,’ and that interrogation scene is the fulcrum on which the whole movie turns. I think Batman finds out — and Bruce Wayne finds out — a lot about himself in that scene. I was just delighted to get to see Christian show that rage. And it’s wonderfully balanced with Gary’s control as well. Even though everyone remembers the scene as being the Joker and Batman, Gordon played a very important part to setting it up and allowing this interrogation to happen. And then as he is watching from the sideline, he sees the exact point where this is going too far. He knows Batman well enough to observe this, to recognize it. He tries to get in, but Batman has locked the door. And what we get to lead to, by the end of the scene, when he’s just pounding on the Joker, I think Heath managed to find the exact essence of the threat of the Joker and who he is: He’s being pounded in the face and he’s laughing and loving it. There’s nothing you can do. As he tells Batman, “You have nothing to do with all of your strength.” There’s this sort of impotence of the strong and the armored and the very muscular Batman; he’s very powerful, but there’s no useful way for this power to be exercised in this scene. He has to confront that.

Originally, at the end of that scene, once the Joker reveals his information, Christian dropped him and then, almost as an afterthought, he kicked him in the head as he walked out of the room. We wound up removing that bit. It seemed a little too petulant for Batman in a way. And really, more than that, what it was is that I liked how Christian played it: When he drops the Joker, he has realized the futility of what he’s done. You see it in his eyes. How do you fight someone who thrives on conflict? It’s a very loose end to be left with.

I love that part in the end, would have loved to see that.

SOURCE: http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2008/10/28/christopher-n-1/
 
Last edited:
My lord, over half that interview was just Terry b---hing about other people's work.

:funny:

Seriously. Did he just question why there wasn't sex in Inception? Not all dreams have sex in them.

Sometimes dreams are nothing but sex but sometimes they're completely devoid of it. I like a lot of Gilliams work but that was just senseless ranting.
 
Seeing Batman kick Joker in the head would have been funny, but I agree with Nolan's decision to cut that out.
 
My lord, over half that interview was just Terry b---hing about other people's work.
He does that a lot. I do admire the honesty though, blunt and discrepant as it often is.
 
Obviously he didnt watch Inception too closely. The reason there is so much action in the dreams is because his mind was trained to go against them. He comes off jealous and *****y. I havent seen a good Gilliam since Brazil
 
Even in context people can disagree with him on the grounds that he doesn't look upon the dreams in Inception in the context of the story.
 
I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but I've really gotten to dislike Nolan's approach to Batman, as well as the movies themselves. While I don't necessarily want the B&R approach, I don't think Batman should be given the "serious realistic crime thriller" treatment either. Among several other issues I have with both films, they just seem to put on a veneer of being deep and thought-provoking (a.k.a. the constant speeches analyzing the action in philosophical terms) despite being actually pretty lame and uninteresting. I don't think his Batman movies are horrible, just seriously overrated.

I really don't know how anyone could possible watch these films and think they were in any way intended to be 'serious realistic crime thrillers'. We've got films where dissolvy-water doomsday machines, secret leagues of ninjas, cars that turns into bikes, and seemingly supernaturally perceptive villains (to list just a few things) exist.
 
Sometimes I do kind of wish that Nolan would cut loose a little bit and incorporate some of Gilliam's anarchic spirit. I never get the sense that he's having much fun when I watch his films, no matter how much fun I have.
 
Sometimes I do kind of wish that Nolan would cut loose a little bit and incorporate some of Gilliam's anarchic spirit. I never get the sense that he's having much fun when I watch his films, no matter how much fun I have.
Good point. I feel that way too.
 
Good point. I feel that way too.

Yeah, it's not a problem for me as such. Each individual film stands on it's own two feet, but as a body of work it can be a bit one note. I'd like to see him stretch his abilities a little more... go in different directions.
 
Yeah, it's not a problem for me as such. Each individual film stands on it's own two feet, but as a body of work it can be a bit one note. I'd like to see him stretch his abilities a little more... go in different directions.
Careful with the Nolan criticisms around here... you walk on fire.
 
On the topic of Terry Gilliam and the lack of sexuality / asexuality in Inception:

Am I the only one who sort of views Ariadne as a lesbian? I know it sounds nuts, and it has nothing to do with Ellen Page, but literally, I see the character as being ambiguously gay, to the point where she could've been played by a guy and it wouldn't have been any different. (Except for the Arthur kiss). Eames, Arthur, Saito -- all of these characters are clearly men on paper. Ariadne, though, on the page, is just a blank.

My main piece of evidence is Ariadne going to the basement level of Cobb's dream and seeing Mal in the hotel room. That scene, if you imagine the right context, is extremely erotic. I don't know what the hell Terry Gilliam is talking about, because he's way off base here. That's perhaps the most sex-driven scene in any of Nolan's movies, and it's a sexual dream.

MAL: What are you doing here?

(As if Ariadne has done something wrong, by going to the basement, going deep down where she's not supposed to go, where she's not supposed to be, and seeing Mal, who is impossibly beautiful and sexy, and Ariadne is just a Plain Jane)

MAL: Do you know what it is to be a lover? To be half of a whole?

That's Cobb's subconscious talking - not Mal herself. That's why it's so odd to me. It's like Cobb telling her "You've never been in a relationship. You don't know what it's like to be in love."

I don't know. In Ariadne, I see an American girl who moved to Paris to study architecture at a university. She moved to the city of love instead of living in her home country where it's not accepted to be gay by most of the people who live there, including her family. It's like she just ran away from her life to study abroad - and architecture, of all subjects, which requires you to build from scratch and create something from nothing - rebuilding your life, maybe. Starting over.
 
Careful with the Nolan criticisms around here... you walk on fire.

Indeed. For the record I've yet to see a Nolan film I didn't love, however one wonders how long he can go on blowing up the same balloon he always has without it popping eventually.
 
Yeah, it's not a problem for me as such. Each individual film stands on it's own two feet, but as a body of work it can be a bit one note. I'd like to see him stretch his abilities a little more... go in different directions.

As a self admitted Nolan Team "fanboy" I cannot agree with this statement more. After TDK he needs to spread out a little more, im not saying do any romantic comedies but....
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,269
Messages
22,077,591
Members
45,877
Latest member
dude9876
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"