There's very much a 'girls are icky' vibe from some posters.
It's really quite strange. There's less now, but still quite an amount of posters that straight up either don't want any major female roles in TDKR or would be perfectly fine if there aren't.
the reason i am fond of Catwoman is that it finally brings an interesting woman to Nolan's table. One that isn't solely used to recite exposition, and one whose existence isn't to die so the male protagonist who loved her feels guilty/bad (TDK, Inception, The Prestige [x2], Memento).
Good point, I think his cliched depiction of women as "dead motivators" is probably his biggest drawback.
I've seen all of his films and noticed your making a generalized statement and forgetting some of his other female characters.
Like who? Not being backchatty, I just honestly come up short in thinking of women who didn't serve stereotypical or "killed for plot push" reasons -
Following - haven't seen this one, but I hear the girl is killed for motivation.
Memento - killed
Batman Begins - Martha Wayne gets practically no attention or dialogue, and Rachel is written fairly poorly
Prestige - Two women killed, another leaves, who doesn't have much personality and serves as part of a love quadrangle
Dark Knight - killed, and Ramirez is a betrayer
Inception - killed, and Ariadne is Nolan's most progressive female character I know of, having survived the plot, though has little character focus and no development. Still does some cool stuff I guess, but is one of the most flat characters.
However in TDK, (which to this day the teaser was telling in multiple ways) the "escalation" and rise of the Joker destroyed this "Idealistic Batman" and what he stood for. The clean city is blown up visually and it looks like hell again by the end of TDK. But the whole time Rachel realizes that Bruce truly just wants things to be better and she is the symbolism of it. But her death made (and probably do more in the third) to make Batman realize that he will always be Batman, and he started something that he will never be able to finish. And he will be haunted forever, until he dies, he can never be that innocent child again, he will forever have to be Batman, tormented and in pain.
Interesting. I don't agree with a lot of it, but certainly well thought out. I find it a little too angsty though, and don't agree that Bruce is man who thinks he'll never be happy and always be in pain. I don't think he is a character who would be like that, especially in Nolan's films. Does he want to be Batman? I don't believe so, and I think he realises he'll be doing this for a long, long time, but I don't think he'll be "haunted forever - tormented and in pain", it strikes me as not what Bruce is. Tormented? Yes. In pain? Occasionally. But not forever, and certainly not constantly.