Blitzkrieg
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2016
- Messages
- 15,599
- Reaction score
- 3,328
- Points
- 78
Nowhere there does it say that she's going to hit on Bruce. You have no evidence. In fact, I think David Mazouz said something about her not being like that or something. Can anyone here find that interview? Have a very great day!At the moment I am in a bit of soul-searching regarding if I should drop my Gotham coverage at Doux Reviews or not.
They introduced this change in order to have Ivy hit on Bruce Wayne (evidence.) Apparently they thought we're happier having Bruce being wooed by someone twice his age than someone six months his junior. They were mistaken.
Nowhere there does it say that she's going to hit on Bruce. You have no evidence. In fact, I think David Mazouz said something about her not being like that or something. Can anyone here find that interview? Have a very great day!
God bless you all!
If you'd bothered to check the links in the post you responded to you'd seen that I included the one where David says that. Or, rather, "it's not going to be a romantic relationship, necessarily."Nowhere there does it say that she's going to hit on Bruce. You have no evidence. In fact, I think David Mazouz said something about her not being like that or something. Can anyone here find that interview? Have a very great day!
God bless you all!
It doesn't say anything about her hitting on him or a romance at all. There could be, but that's not confirmed there and it isn't evidence. Why would I look at all the links? I was only replying to that one.If you'd bothered to check the links in the post you responded to you'd seen that I included the one where David says that. Or, rather, "it's not going to be a romantic relationship, necessarily."
As for not having any evidence the official character description of Ivy - which they have since done their best to play down, and which I linked - was how "now a 19-year-old woman whos harnessed the full power of her charms, she sets her sights on Bruce Wayne." Isn't that clear enough?
Aren't you capable to link one part of a sentence together with one other? As in, "harnessed the full power of her charms", -> "sets her sight on Bruce Wayne"? Exactly what is the implication here?It doesn't say anything about her hitting on him or a romance at all. There could be, but that's not confirmed there and it isn't evidence. Why would I look at all the links? I was only replying to that one.
It was an Ok start to the new season, I like what they are doing with Cat, and Fish;'s band of misfits look interesting.
The show has no real buzz or excitement around it now. The rating shows that it's (hopefully) found it's level and secured a dedicated audience.
It'll no doubt drop below 1.0 by the spring, get a renewal and have a final fourth season on a different night/slot, while FOX moves on to Black Lightning.
Batman is owned by WB. If we were to come to a situation where Fox could no longer renew it, it would be possible for another network to pick it up.If Gotham does get cancelled, is it possible to be scooped up by another network, or does Fox have such a stranglehold on everything Batman that would effectively be impossible?
Batman is owned by WB. If we were to come to a situation where Fox could no longer renew it, it would be possible for another network to pick it up.
We'll get two seasons out of Fox, of that I am more or less certain. I also feel I may have been a little too doom-and-gloom about the premiere, but we'll see how it develops. I mean, it's hardly impossible to imagine a scenario where they want more. But I guess CW might be a possibility too.
And I'm the same, I dearly want the show to succeed.
If they brought in a young Clark Kent for an episode or two. I can see a big ratings spike.