Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]381677[/split]
OK, so I got from seeing The Avengers a second time and after absolutely loving it the first time I will say this - this movie might not hold up as well during repeat viewing. Once the wow-factor of seeing so many comic book icons was out of the way, I realised that the jokes and humor played a huge role in how much you enjoyed the film the first time around. Today though, I already knew the jokes so I was ready to dig in deep to find some more meat and depth that I might have missed earlier but what I found was that without the deflecting power of humor, the film's flaws become that much more apparent. There is a lot of cheese in The Avengers, especially during the third act. Loki gets some moments to shine but by the end, he stops being a viable threat and devolves into a joke...
...especially that little whine he lets out and his silly facial expression after the Hulk smashes him around like a ragdoll. Making a mockery out of the main villain of the movie is generally not a good idea. When it comes to writing, Stark easily got the best lines followed by Banner (not the Hulk) and Thor (I absolutely love the way he mocks "you humans are so petty!". Comparatively, Captain America and Hawkeye got the shaft in the writing department and Black Widow often came off as too smug, pretentious and annoying.
I was also really cringing during some of the ending stuff such as news footage of that lone girl going "Captain America saved my life, so wherever he is, thank you". I mean, really? Tony's "one-way trip" sequence was just a complete miss, because a) Hulk catching his fall was spoiled in oh-so-many trailers and TV spots and b)nothing in the film gives any indication whatsoever that it was something that you might genuinely expect to happen. The tone of the entire movie is very playful and half-serious, and the fact that Iron Man 3 has already been announced, the scenes of Thor, Hulk and Cap looking at a presumed-to-be-dead Tony come off as emotionally artificial, forced and unnecessary. The first time, it was funny to see Hulk's scream waking Tony up and then the big green guy thumping his chest, but not so much the second time around.
The writing in general is not bad, it's just that its quality jumps up and down too much and too often like a rollercoaster ride, and the lack of consistency almost makes it feel like about one-third of the film was written by completely different writers.
I don't know, maybe I've lost my sense of humor. Maybe I am not using the proper criteria but I will be the first to say this - in the long term, The Avengers will be viewed far more favourably by the general audience than it would be in the fanboy community. That is because if there is one thing I know about hardcore devotees in general, is that we are very detail-oriented (obsessively so) and can be very unforgiving of minor flaws because they just tend to stick out more and more as time passes by. When you think of Marvel's best efforts to date - X2, Spiderman 2, First Class, Iron Man - they are considered fan favourites not because of the immense first impression they made, but because they withstood the test of time, because those films had a lot going on underneath surface and rewarded repeat viewings. If your second and third experiences with The Avengers turns out anything like mine, then I am willing to bet that us fanboy lot are going to throw The Avengers off its pedestal almost as quickly as we put it up there.
This is what always happens when Thread Manager screws around with a thread that has a pollCan anyone explain to me why I can't vote in the poll? It says its closed every time I try to do so.
I'm not sure about that. The quality of repeated experiences vary from viewer to viewer, so you can't speak for everyone else. Even some of the aforementioned best Marvel movies have also fallen a little under scrutiny or people readjusted their opinions after the second, third etc time. FYI, my cousin, who has never seen a movie more than once in the cinemas (not since Titanic, but that was a long time ago) wanted to see this movie again. Which goes to show how good The Avengers is in terms of instant rewatchability and universal appeal.
As for The Avengers, it seems to be the consensus that repeated viewings warrant the same if not increased level of enjoyment. if you are invested in characterisation as opposed to just humour and action, that is.
And Punisher, The Avengers gives you a good sense of 'family' particularly towards the end AND in that second post credits scene.
okay all I have to say about lastnight's screening HERE (there were 100 screenings all over the states yesterday) is....
HOLYCHITTHATWASAWESOME!!!!
......ahhhh I do think it dragged a bit at the beginning which is why I'd rate it a 9, but to me personally I liked the 3D, it wasn't that bad, and I do have to say this is by far my fave Superhero film.
Raiden said:I'm not that surprised about your comment, because you've made it clear that while the movie surpasses your expectation, you've never fully appreciate the movie.
Raiden said:But as I said, the fact that this movie actually make you like it in spite of yourself and your Batman fandom is quite an accomplishment by itself.
I don't know why they elected to have Thor duck for cover at the end of that scene, it would have only tickled him.
We must've seen different versions of the film.
Yeah peeps TAG your spoilers in this thread. nobody reading THESE messages wants to be spoiled.Well guess what? Most of us in the US haven't seen it at all so stop talking specifics.