Except for the FFINO defenders who wanted to see Fant4stic 10 times.
Those still exist? I thought they died off when Fish & Wildlife revoked their "endangered species" status?
Except for the FFINO defenders who wanted to see Fant4stic 10 times.
Dave Filoni also was behind Rebels and worked on Avatar: The Last Airbender for Nickelodeon. He is often considered as George Lucas's Padawan by many fans. He's done quite a bit of voice acting and animation as well. Above of things, he is a diehard Star Wars fan. We're talking Kevin Feige level here.Damn. This has become a much bigger problem than I anticipated.
That's what worries me the most. Even if she steps down, the person who replaces her could damage the franchise as much as she did or even worse. What we need is someone who really cares about the Star Wars universe, its lore, and the potential it represents instead of someone who just wants to impose their agenda.
Big Bang mentioned Dave Filoni. I've only seen Clone Wars, so I can't agree or disagree. I would need to see more of his work before giving my full opinion and taking a definitive stance.
Filoni initially struggled with writing Ahsoka because he had "zero perspective" on what it was like to be a 14-year-old girl. He therefore shifted his focus and instead wrote Ahsoka primarily as a Jedi who just happens to be an adolescent female.
One can only hope, but I believe it when I see it. I would also need to see who would replace her before being excited about it.
Damn. This has become a much bigger problem than I anticipated.
That's what worries me the most. Even if she steps down, the person who replaces her could damage the franchise as much as she did or even worse. What we need is someone who really cares about the Star Wars universe, its lore, and the potential it represents instead of someone who just wants to impose their agenda.
Big Bang mentioned Dave Filoni. I've only seen Clone Wars, so I can't agree or disagree. I would need to see more of his work before giving my full opinion and taking a definitive stance.
Those still exist? I thought they died off when Fish & Wildlife revoked their "endangered species" status?
I actually think a lot of people learned their lesson. I think there were a lot of people who honestly wanted to believe the film would be good and Fox and Kinberg taught them a tough and sad lesson.our hopes this week rest on pins and needles, and sleep is on a bed of nails.
Let us pray Stan "The Man"'s special announcement resolves things outside the politics and business of the deal
Our Eternity, who channels Kirby...
I actually think a lot of people learned their lesson. I think there were a lot of people who honestly wanted to believe the film would be good and Fox and Kinberg taught them a tough and sad lesson.
... and I have a strong feeling that anyone who didn't learn the lesson then will soon be learning it when we find out more about Dark Phoenix.
I don't know about that. Never underestimate how stubborn people can be. There will always be those who want to play keep away with Marvel, which simply boggles the mind.I actually think a lot of people learned their lesson. I think there were a lot of people who honestly wanted to believe the film would be good and Fox and Kinberg taught them a tough and sad lesson.
... and I have a strong feeling that anyone who didn't learn the lesson then will soon be learning it when we find out more about Dark Phoenix.
Eh, well not quite. To me Filoni is another Geoff Johns; yeah sure hes a great creative force in one medium(comics, cartoons) but that doesnt mean hell be a good force in terms of live-action since he has little to no experience managing business side of things. Filoni is good showrunner and unlike Kennedy he does have a vast knowledge of Star Wars but the what people are missing when they make the Fiege comparison is that while Feige has an intimate knowledge of the Marvel Universe he also had what Filoni doesnt - film experience. Feige had worked on many Marvel films as an executive producer and saw the ins-and-outs if everything so he could apply those lessons to the films he worked on when he became the head honcho of Marvel Studios.Dave Filoni also was behind Rebels and worked on Avatar: The Last Airbender for Nickelodeon. He is often considered as George Lucas's Padawan by many fans. He's done quite a bit of voice acting and animation as well. Above of things, he is a diehard Star Wars fan. We're talking Kevin Feige level here.
The best choice to be put in charge of Star Wars is already working for the Mouse. Bump Ms. Kennedy upstairs after Alan Horn's retirement (He's 75!) and put Feige in charge of ALL Disney live action - Marvel, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Animation Remakes, and the FOX franchises that are (probably) coming over.
Having Feige spread too thinly over all these franchises would probably be detrimental to Marvel. Let someone else do it and let him continue with the MCU.
Fiege already has hands full managing production on three Marvel films. He wouldnt have the time. I wonder if The Russo Brothers would be interested? theyre pretty big Star Wars nuts themselves.
I really couldnt care less who buys Fox I only care about the Fantastic Four rights which are currently stuck with Fox and really need to back to Marvel ASAP before that Doctor Doom movie no one asked for goes into production.
The real newsthat interests me is what happens to the Marvel rights if Comcast were to get Fox. I suspect that if Comcast got the rights they would not revert to Marvel but stay with Fox(or be transferred to Universal, and theyd reboot anyway), or perhaps things remain the same & Comcast lets Fox continue on with things like they were never bought either way my chief concern is the Marvel rights(especially Fantastic Four rights).
The Judge is expected to make a decision on the AT&T/Time Warner merger on June 12th.What was June 12th again? The vote at Fox or the AT merger?
I'm nearly certain the rights wouldn't automatically revert, but I'm less certain of what Comcast would do.
A Doom or FF film made without Marvel/Disney cooperation is likely to be a loser, and Comcast should recognize that (we will all certainly let everybody who will listen know our opinion if it comes to that).
But I also think that's such a slim possibility that there's not much point in worrying about or discussing it.
Disney isn't going to walk away from this with nothing and the assets we're most concerned with are more valuable to Disney than Comcast, so one way or another, I think it's a near certainty that Marvel will have the rights by the time the dust settles - and they're likely to have a lot more on top of it.
If I really, really wanted Disney to get Sky, I'd be nervous right now, but that's not my concern, so I'm not nervous.
When you get down to it, I can see Disney backing off of Sky, and instead pursuing a similar company that can be leveraged at a much lower cost or doubling down on Star rather than risk investment by trying to compete with Comcast for Sky.If I really, really wanted Disney to get Sky, I'd be nervous right now, but that's not my concern, so I'm not nervous.
Even if Judge Richard Leon next week allows AT&Ts $85 billion acquisition of Time Warner, the telco can still end up a loser.
President Trumps Department of Justice, if it loses its suit to stop the mega-merger, could appeal and ask for a stay a delay that could stop the merger from closing for four to six months while an appellate court ponders a decision, legal experts said.
And that could be enough to rock the merger off its foundation, sources said, as the merger agreement expires on June 21.
Judge Leon is expected to rule on June 12. Ruling against the merger would kill the deal, for sure and cast a chill on the many others lining up to gain antitrust approval.
To be sure, while a DOJ appeal of an adverse ruling is nearly a sure thing, winning a stay is not a sure thing. In the last seven antitrust appeals in merger cases, the government has won significant enough stays to delay the underlying merger three times, or 43 percent of the time, according to a recent Bank of America analysis.
That includes in 2000, when emergency relief was granted to the Federal Trade Commission in its suit to stop HJ Heinz from buying Beech-Nut, according to the BofA analysis.
Six of those seven were FTC cases and not DOJ cases like the AT&T fight and the standard for getting a delay in a DOJ case is higher.
Whether Trumps regulators could get a stay pending appeal in the AT&T case is a matter of some debate, sources familiar with the case tell The Post.
If the DOJ loses the AT&T case but wins a stay on appeal, there is a 50-50 chance the deal could fall apart before the appellate argument is even heard, according to the analysis, prepared for its hedge fund clients and reviewed by The Post.
Of course, Time Warner may just threaten to walk in hopes of winning a higher price from AT&T, one source close to the situation maintained.
The telco should have to pay more because the deal, going on two years, is taking so much time to clear and Time Warner could attract more from other potential suitors, the source said.