Penguin
The Buccaneer of Birds
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
- Messages
- 281
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
People can diss the voice and the suit all they want, Bale's Bruce Wayne will always be the gold standard to me because he A. he was physically suited for the role, and B. he showed a lot of range, and really nailed the balancing act of playing all these different facets of Wayne. He had the anger and determination in spades, he was able to effortlessly portray 'damaged goods'. But at the same time, he had likability and genuine warmth and compassion, you could tell he was a man driven by dark and tragic things but had found a purpose and was trying to achieve a better tomorrow for his city. He wasn't flat out crazy, but he was driven and obsessed to the point of near absurdity and had to portray that all within a more 'realistic' setting, and Bale made all of that feel psychologically credible. He captured the soul of the character...better yet he captured it three times during three distinct stages of Bruce's life and gave three different performances to reflect that, but the character felt consistent all the way through.
I think perhaps people take his Bruce Wayne for granted because Bale is such a good actor and has done more flashy performances, but honestly he brought a tremendous amount to the role by sheer virtue of the whole "Christian Bale package" he inherently brought to it. Though I do think he cared a lot about the role and was never phoning it in, despite what people say about TDK.
This is late as I dont visit this thread much, but that was spot on.
Its amazing how people have such criticism for his interpretation, they just focus on the voice. If people are going to focus on a voice, then why not apply the same criticism to the other Batman portrayals?
Bale is either right under or equal to Conroy in terms of being Batman, IMO.

