Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]387649[/split]
Apparently, according to Ifans, [blackout]the guy at the end isn't Norman[/blackout].
Who the hell is it then ?
It was after the initial credits.Wait, huh?
Was there a post-credits scene I didn't know about?
Ha, you totally missed it.
Sorry dude, it's just a question I ask to see whether people liked the past films or not. Chill out.Nevincer said:The Raimi/Reboot conflict. It never stops. It's like Marvel/DC.
Hm. So it's pretty much like I expected in quality. Not totally surprising. Is it true that they cut a bunch of stuff?Boom said:My rankings would be:
Spider-Man 2 (9/10)
Spider-Man (8/10)
The Amazing Spider-Man (7/10)
Spider-Man 3 (5/10)
Excluding the third one, Raimi's films were much more consistent (both in story and overall quality) than TAS.
Aw. Then again, I wasn't expecting it to surpass Raimi for me. And on its own, it sounds like a rather mediocre to average film.Kane52630 said:After seeing TASM, I was left feeling bored and was looking at the time to see if it's over yet. There's some great scenes but the majority of it doesn't compare to the fun and charm that was Raimi's Spider-Man.
That's probably a good decision.Nevincer said:I've already made up my mind that I won't be seeing TASM. If it wasn't out the same month as TDKR i'd maybe consider it if reviews got better, but now it's a no go.
Ha, I have a terrible memory.MrWayne said:Yea I do, lol, we talked about this remember?? I have love for the Raimi films (Sorry Nev) because well, they arent complete crap. It was good for the time, and even though 3 was very meh, I did get some enjoyment out of it, so it's not a complete fail imo, but 3 does suck
Again, they worked for that moment in time. Now, lets fast foward... I think this time they may have nailed it. We are def getting a sequel and it's planned to be a trilogy, so whatever didnt work in the 1st maybe will get worked out by the 2nd installment. I have confidence in this new series.
I just really hope the series progresses, I dont wanna get to 3 and then what? Anouther reboot?? Idk if I can take anouther reboot...
It was after the initial credits.
Connors is sitting in a jail cell, and a mysterious figure asks him if he told Peter the truth about his father.
I didn't know you were so apathetic towards the film.I would've went to see it if they didn't already release 1/4 of the thing online anyway, and gave away the ending with the game, and..yano..if it came out 4 years from now when it might be even slightly needed.
Agreed. As I've said before, the thing that killed my interest in this film? Sony's panic and overexposure of the whole thing. That just ruined it. I was so on board at the beginning, then it became "Damage Control: The Movie".I would've went to see it if they didn't already release 1/4 of the thing online anyway, and gave away the ending with the game, and..yano..if it came out 4 years from now when it might be even slightly needed.
Heh, so you played the game that was tied to the movie, and you're blaming them for ruining the ending to the movie you haven't seen?I would've went to see it if they didn't already release 1/4 of the thing online anyway, and gave away the ending with the game, and..yano..if it came out 4 years from now when it might be even slightly needed.
Heh, so you played the game that was tied to the movie, and you're blaming them for ruining the ending to the movie you haven't seen?
Agreed. As I've said before, the thing that killed my interest in this film? Sony's panic and overexposure of the whole thing. That just ruined it. I was so on board at the beginning, then it became "Damage Control: The Movie".
Yeah, so maybe you shouldn't have played it if you didn't want to be spoiled. The only person you can blame for that is yourself.It came out a week before the film here..
Well to be fair, everything else he said still stands.Yeah, so maybe you shouldn't have played it if you didn't want to be spoiled. The only person you can blame for that is yourself.
Kinda. I knew the film would be disliked by some no matter what, but I was hoping it would be so in terms of it's "daringness"... not it's acting, characterization, and lackthereof of the former. Once I heard they were playing it safe and it is essentially just a slightly more comic accurate SM1, I knew it wouldn't be my cup of tea.Did the pretty average reception put you off as well?
I feel like I remember you citing that as one of the reasons you no longer wanted/needed to see it.
I'll see it next week and relay my thoughts.Kinda. I knew the film would be disliked by some no matter what, but I was hoping it would be so in terms of it's "daringness"... not it's acting, characterization, and lackthereof of the former. Once I heard they were playing it safe and it is essentially just a slightly more comic accurate SM1, I knew it wouldn't be my cup of tea.